Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material

Elisabeth Bergers, Paul J. van Diest, Jan P A Baak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

DNA-variables such as DNA-ploidy, DNA-index and %S-phase cells have been proven to have prognostic value for breast cancer patients. These variables can be obtained by interpreting DNA-histograms by cell cycle analysis. Since there are a number of potential error sources, the aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis with the emphasis on DNA ploidy and %S-phase assessments. The 149 DNA-histograms we used were randomly selected from the Multicentre Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project, a nationwide prospective study in The Netherlands on the reproducibility and prognostic power of quantitative assessments. These DNA-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry of fresh frozen breast cancer material. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to a strict protocol with the semi-automated computer program 'MultiCycle', using the background correction option; 68 histograms were analyzed in duplicate by the same observer, and 81 histograms were analyzed by two observers. Assessment of DNA-ploidy showed an intra-observer concordance of 99% (κ-value 0.98) and an inter-observer concordance of 94% (κ-value 0.91). The disagreement could be attributed to overlooking a DNA-tetraploid cell cycle in one case, some difficult histograms and varying opinions about small peaks between the observers in a few cases. Intra-observer %S-phase correlation coefficients varied between 0.72 for the %S-phase of the second aneuploid cell cycle and 0.99 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle. Inter-observer correlation coefficients varied between 0.81 for the %S-phase of the second cell cycle and 0.95 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle and the average %S-phase cells. As for DNA-index, intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms from fresh breast cancer material using the MultiCycle program, following a strict protocol, is in principle high. The results of this study may help us to decide which of the different %S-phases provided by cell cycle analysis software should be used in daily practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalAnalytical Cellular Pathology
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cell Cycle
S Phase
Breast Neoplasms
DNA
Ploidies
Diploidy
Software
Tetraploidy
Aneuploidy
Netherlands
Flow Cytometry
Research Design
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Cell cycle analysis
  • DNA-histograms
  • Flow cytometry
  • Reproducibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material. / Bergers, Elisabeth; van Diest, Paul J.; Baak, Jan P A.

In: Analytical Cellular Pathology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.1995, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7816807d61c4d70bb32c3a551b587db,
title = "Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material",
abstract = "DNA-variables such as DNA-ploidy, DNA-index and {\%}S-phase cells have been proven to have prognostic value for breast cancer patients. These variables can be obtained by interpreting DNA-histograms by cell cycle analysis. Since there are a number of potential error sources, the aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis with the emphasis on DNA ploidy and {\%}S-phase assessments. The 149 DNA-histograms we used were randomly selected from the Multicentre Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project, a nationwide prospective study in The Netherlands on the reproducibility and prognostic power of quantitative assessments. These DNA-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry of fresh frozen breast cancer material. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to a strict protocol with the semi-automated computer program 'MultiCycle', using the background correction option; 68 histograms were analyzed in duplicate by the same observer, and 81 histograms were analyzed by two observers. Assessment of DNA-ploidy showed an intra-observer concordance of 99{\%} (κ-value 0.98) and an inter-observer concordance of 94{\%} (κ-value 0.91). The disagreement could be attributed to overlooking a DNA-tetraploid cell cycle in one case, some difficult histograms and varying opinions about small peaks between the observers in a few cases. Intra-observer {\%}S-phase correlation coefficients varied between 0.72 for the {\%}S-phase of the second aneuploid cell cycle and 0.99 for the {\%}S-phase of the diploid cell cycle. Inter-observer correlation coefficients varied between 0.81 for the {\%}S-phase of the second cell cycle and 0.95 for the {\%}S-phase of the diploid cell cycle and the average {\%}S-phase cells. As for DNA-index, intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms from fresh breast cancer material using the MultiCycle program, following a strict protocol, is in principle high. The results of this study may help us to decide which of the different {\%}S-phases provided by cell cycle analysis software should be used in daily practice.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Cell cycle analysis, DNA-histograms, Flow cytometry, Reproducibility",
author = "Elisabeth Bergers and {van Diest}, {Paul J.} and Baak, {Jan P A}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Analytical Cellular Pathology",
issn = "0921-8912",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms of fresh breast cancer material

AU - Bergers, Elisabeth

AU - van Diest, Paul J.

AU - Baak, Jan P A

PY - 1995/1

Y1 - 1995/1

N2 - DNA-variables such as DNA-ploidy, DNA-index and %S-phase cells have been proven to have prognostic value for breast cancer patients. These variables can be obtained by interpreting DNA-histograms by cell cycle analysis. Since there are a number of potential error sources, the aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis with the emphasis on DNA ploidy and %S-phase assessments. The 149 DNA-histograms we used were randomly selected from the Multicentre Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project, a nationwide prospective study in The Netherlands on the reproducibility and prognostic power of quantitative assessments. These DNA-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry of fresh frozen breast cancer material. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to a strict protocol with the semi-automated computer program 'MultiCycle', using the background correction option; 68 histograms were analyzed in duplicate by the same observer, and 81 histograms were analyzed by two observers. Assessment of DNA-ploidy showed an intra-observer concordance of 99% (κ-value 0.98) and an inter-observer concordance of 94% (κ-value 0.91). The disagreement could be attributed to overlooking a DNA-tetraploid cell cycle in one case, some difficult histograms and varying opinions about small peaks between the observers in a few cases. Intra-observer %S-phase correlation coefficients varied between 0.72 for the %S-phase of the second aneuploid cell cycle and 0.99 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle. Inter-observer correlation coefficients varied between 0.81 for the %S-phase of the second cell cycle and 0.95 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle and the average %S-phase cells. As for DNA-index, intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms from fresh breast cancer material using the MultiCycle program, following a strict protocol, is in principle high. The results of this study may help us to decide which of the different %S-phases provided by cell cycle analysis software should be used in daily practice.

AB - DNA-variables such as DNA-ploidy, DNA-index and %S-phase cells have been proven to have prognostic value for breast cancer patients. These variables can be obtained by interpreting DNA-histograms by cell cycle analysis. Since there are a number of potential error sources, the aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis with the emphasis on DNA ploidy and %S-phase assessments. The 149 DNA-histograms we used were randomly selected from the Multicentre Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project, a nationwide prospective study in The Netherlands on the reproducibility and prognostic power of quantitative assessments. These DNA-histograms were obtained by flow cytometry of fresh frozen breast cancer material. Cell cycle analysis was performed according to a strict protocol with the semi-automated computer program 'MultiCycle', using the background correction option; 68 histograms were analyzed in duplicate by the same observer, and 81 histograms were analyzed by two observers. Assessment of DNA-ploidy showed an intra-observer concordance of 99% (κ-value 0.98) and an inter-observer concordance of 94% (κ-value 0.91). The disagreement could be attributed to overlooking a DNA-tetraploid cell cycle in one case, some difficult histograms and varying opinions about small peaks between the observers in a few cases. Intra-observer %S-phase correlation coefficients varied between 0.72 for the %S-phase of the second aneuploid cell cycle and 0.99 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle. Inter-observer correlation coefficients varied between 0.81 for the %S-phase of the second cell cycle and 0.95 for the %S-phase of the diploid cell cycle and the average %S-phase cells. As for DNA-index, intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were 0.97 and 0.94, respectively. In conclusion, intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometric DNA-histograms from fresh breast cancer material using the MultiCycle program, following a strict protocol, is in principle high. The results of this study may help us to decide which of the different %S-phases provided by cell cycle analysis software should be used in daily practice.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Cell cycle analysis

KW - DNA-histograms

KW - Flow cytometry

KW - Reproducibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028912564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028912564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7734408

AN - SCOPUS:0028912564

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Analytical Cellular Pathology

JF - Analytical Cellular Pathology

SN - 0921-8912

IS - 1

ER -