Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

Richard A. Deyo, Samuel F. Dworkin, Dagmar Amtmann, Gunnar Andersson, David Borenstein, Eugene Carragee, John Carrino, Roger Chou, Karon Cook, Anthony Delitto, Christine Goertz, Partap Khalsa, John Loeser, Sean Mackey, James Panagis, James Rainville, Tor Tosteson, Dennis Turk, Michael Von Korff, Debra K. Weiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific, and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Design: Expert panel and preliminary evaluation of key recommendations. Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. Conclusion: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document, and undergo continual improvement. Perspective: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1249-1267
Number of pages19
JournalPain Medicine
Volume15
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Low Back Pain
Research
Pain
Research Personnel
Research Subjects
Phenotype
Organized Financing
Nervous System
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Chronic low back pain
  • Low back pain
  • Minimum dataset
  • NIH task force
  • Research standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Deyo, R. A., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., ... Weiner, D. K. (2014). Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Pain Medicine, 15(8), 1249-1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12538

Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. / Deyo, Richard A.; Dworkin, Samuel F.; Amtmann, Dagmar; Andersson, Gunnar; Borenstein, David; Carragee, Eugene; Carrino, John; Chou, Roger; Cook, Karon; Delitto, Anthony; Goertz, Christine; Khalsa, Partap; Loeser, John; Mackey, Sean; Panagis, James; Rainville, James; Tosteson, Tor; Turk, Dennis; Korff, Michael Von; Weiner, Debra K.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2014, p. 1249-1267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deyo, RA, Dworkin, SF, Amtmann, D, Andersson, G, Borenstein, D, Carragee, E, Carrino, J, Chou, R, Cook, K, Delitto, A, Goertz, C, Khalsa, P, Loeser, J, Mackey, S, Panagis, J, Rainville, J, Tosteson, T, Turk, D, Korff, MV & Weiner, DK 2014, 'Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain', Pain Medicine, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1249-1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12538
Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E et al. Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Pain Medicine. 2014;15(8):1249-1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12538
Deyo, Richard A. ; Dworkin, Samuel F. ; Amtmann, Dagmar ; Andersson, Gunnar ; Borenstein, David ; Carragee, Eugene ; Carrino, John ; Chou, Roger ; Cook, Karon ; Delitto, Anthony ; Goertz, Christine ; Khalsa, Partap ; Loeser, John ; Mackey, Sean ; Panagis, James ; Rainville, James ; Tosteson, Tor ; Turk, Dennis ; Korff, Michael Von ; Weiner, Debra K. / Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. In: Pain Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 8. pp. 1249-1267.
@article{41f021e1ef0e4936b77932c99934ff18,
title = "Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain",
abstract = "Objective: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific, and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Design: Expert panel and preliminary evaluation of key recommendations. Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting {"}responder analyses{"} in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. Conclusion: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document, and undergo continual improvement. Perspective: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.",
keywords = "Chronic low back pain, Low back pain, Minimum dataset, NIH task force, Research standards",
author = "Deyo, {Richard A.} and Dworkin, {Samuel F.} and Dagmar Amtmann and Gunnar Andersson and David Borenstein and Eugene Carragee and John Carrino and Roger Chou and Karon Cook and Anthony Delitto and Christine Goertz and Partap Khalsa and John Loeser and Sean Mackey and James Panagis and James Rainville and Tor Tosteson and Dennis Turk and Korff, {Michael Von} and Weiner, {Debra K.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/pme.12538",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1249--1267",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

AU - Deyo, Richard A.

AU - Dworkin, Samuel F.

AU - Amtmann, Dagmar

AU - Andersson, Gunnar

AU - Borenstein, David

AU - Carragee, Eugene

AU - Carrino, John

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Cook, Karon

AU - Delitto, Anthony

AU - Goertz, Christine

AU - Khalsa, Partap

AU - Loeser, John

AU - Mackey, Sean

AU - Panagis, James

AU - Rainville, James

AU - Tosteson, Tor

AU - Turk, Dennis

AU - Korff, Michael Von

AU - Weiner, Debra K.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific, and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Design: Expert panel and preliminary evaluation of key recommendations. Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. Conclusion: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document, and undergo continual improvement. Perspective: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.

AB - Objective: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific, and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Design: Expert panel and preliminary evaluation of key recommendations. Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. Conclusion: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document, and undergo continual improvement. Perspective: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for chronic low back pain. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum dataset, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.

KW - Chronic low back pain

KW - Low back pain

KW - Minimum dataset

KW - NIH task force

KW - Research standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906047185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906047185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pme.12538

DO - 10.1111/pme.12538

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1249

EP - 1267

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 8

ER -