Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

Richard A. Deyo, Samuel F. Dworkin, Dagmar Amtmann, Gunnar Andersson, David Borenstein, Eugene Carragee, John Carrino, Roger Chou, Karon Cook, Anthony DeLitto, Christine Goertz, Partap Khalsa, John Loeser, Sean Mackey, James Panagis, James Rainville, Tor Tosteson, Dennis Turk, Michael Von Korff, Debra K. Weiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. The purpose of this article is to disseminate the report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) task force on research standards for cLBP.

Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a research task force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting.

Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved these recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals.

Conclusions: The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-467
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Advisory Committees
Low Back Pain
Research
Pain
Research Personnel
Research Subjects
Organized Financing
Information Systems
Nervous System
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Phenotype

Keywords

  • Chronic Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chiropractics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Deyo, R. A., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., ... Weiner, D. K. (2014). Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 37(7), 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.006

Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. / Deyo, Richard A.; Dworkin, Samuel F.; Amtmann, Dagmar; Andersson, Gunnar; Borenstein, David; Carragee, Eugene; Carrino, John; Chou, Roger; Cook, Karon; DeLitto, Anthony; Goertz, Christine; Khalsa, Partap; Loeser, John; Mackey, Sean; Panagis, James; Rainville, James; Tosteson, Tor; Turk, Dennis; Von Korff, Michael; Weiner, Debra K.

In: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Vol. 37, No. 7, 01.09.2014, p. 449-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deyo, RA, Dworkin, SF, Amtmann, D, Andersson, G, Borenstein, D, Carragee, E, Carrino, J, Chou, R, Cook, K, DeLitto, A, Goertz, C, Khalsa, P, Loeser, J, Mackey, S, Panagis, J, Rainville, J, Tosteson, T, Turk, D, Von Korff, M & Weiner, DK 2014, 'Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain', Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.006
Deyo, Richard A. ; Dworkin, Samuel F. ; Amtmann, Dagmar ; Andersson, Gunnar ; Borenstein, David ; Carragee, Eugene ; Carrino, John ; Chou, Roger ; Cook, Karon ; DeLitto, Anthony ; Goertz, Christine ; Khalsa, Partap ; Loeser, John ; Mackey, Sean ; Panagis, James ; Rainville, James ; Tosteson, Tor ; Turk, Dennis ; Von Korff, Michael ; Weiner, Debra K. / Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. In: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2014 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 449-467.
@article{33ff7ed0f6454588ba7aa95c881b25c3,
title = "Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain",
abstract = "Objectives: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. The purpose of this article is to disseminate the report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) task force on research standards for cLBP.Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a research task force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting.Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting {"}responder analyses{"} in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved these recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals.Conclusions: The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.",
keywords = "Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain, Patient Outcome Assessment, Research Design",
author = "Deyo, {Richard A.} and Dworkin, {Samuel F.} and Dagmar Amtmann and Gunnar Andersson and David Borenstein and Eugene Carragee and John Carrino and Roger Chou and Karon Cook and Anthony DeLitto and Christine Goertz and Partap Khalsa and John Loeser and Sean Mackey and James Panagis and James Rainville and Tor Tosteson and Dennis Turk and {Von Korff}, Michael and Weiner, {Debra K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "449--467",
journal = "Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics",
issn = "0161-4754",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Report of the national institutes of health task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

AU - Deyo, Richard A.

AU - Dworkin, Samuel F.

AU - Amtmann, Dagmar

AU - Andersson, Gunnar

AU - Borenstein, David

AU - Carragee, Eugene

AU - Carrino, John

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Cook, Karon

AU - DeLitto, Anthony

AU - Goertz, Christine

AU - Khalsa, Partap

AU - Loeser, John

AU - Mackey, Sean

AU - Panagis, James

AU - Rainville, James

AU - Tosteson, Tor

AU - Turk, Dennis

AU - Von Korff, Michael

AU - Weiner, Debra K.

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - Objectives: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. The purpose of this article is to disseminate the report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) task force on research standards for cLBP.Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a research task force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting.Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved these recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals.Conclusions: The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

AB - Objectives: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. The purpose of this article is to disseminate the report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) task force on research standards for cLBP.Methods: The NIH Pain Consortium charged a research task force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting.Results: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe research subjects (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved these recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals.Conclusions: The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

KW - Chronic Pain

KW - Low Back Pain

KW - Patient Outcome Assessment

KW - Research Design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908243458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908243458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.07.006

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 449

EP - 467

JO - Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

SN - 0161-4754

IS - 7

ER -