Reoperation for proximal adjacent segment pathology in posterior cervical fusion constructs that fuse to c2 vs c3

Yuanxuan Xia, Risheng Xu, Thomas A. Kosztowski, Seba Ramhmdani, A. Karim Ahmed, Sheng-fu Lo, Ali Bydon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have described rates of proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of proximal CASP at C2 vs C3 in PCDFs for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of 380 cases of PCDF for degenerative disease with proximal constructs ending at C2 vs C3 was performed. Minimum follow-up was 12 mo. The primary outcome was proximal CASP requiring reoperation. Variable analysis included demographic, operative, and complication data. RESULTS: There were 119 patients in the C2 group and 261 in the C3 group with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, or complications. Vertebral artery injury rates were 0.8% in the C2 group and 0.0% in the C3 group (P =. 12). No patients in the C2 group had reoperation for proximal CASP, while 5.0% of patients in the C3 group did (P =. 01). Patients with arthrodesis up to C3 had an increased risk of proximal failure when the fusion construct crossed the cervicothoracic junction (P =. 03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no factors that were independently associated with re-instrumentation for proximal CASP. CONCLUSION: Instrumenting to the C2 level reduces the risk for proximal CASP compared to fusion only up to C3. The type of instrumentation used at these 2 levels, form of ASP disease at C1-C2, and natural motion of the relevant proximal adjacent joint may contribute to this difference. Furthermore, within the C3 cohort, fusion across the cervicothoracic junction increased the risk for proximal CASP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbernyz019
Pages (from-to)E520-E526
JournalClinical Neurosurgery
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Reoperation
Pathology
Decompression
Vertebral Artery
Arthrodesis
Comorbidity
Spine
Joints
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Demography
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • C2 pedicle screw
  • C3 lateral mass
  • Cervicothoracic junction
  • Proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Reoperation for proximal adjacent segment pathology in posterior cervical fusion constructs that fuse to c2 vs c3. / Xia, Yuanxuan; Xu, Risheng; Kosztowski, Thomas A.; Ramhmdani, Seba; Ahmed, A. Karim; Lo, Sheng-fu; Bydon, Ali.

In: Clinical Neurosurgery, Vol. 85, No. 3, nyz019, 01.09.2019, p. E520-E526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xia, Yuanxuan ; Xu, Risheng ; Kosztowski, Thomas A. ; Ramhmdani, Seba ; Ahmed, A. Karim ; Lo, Sheng-fu ; Bydon, Ali. / Reoperation for proximal adjacent segment pathology in posterior cervical fusion constructs that fuse to c2 vs c3. In: Clinical Neurosurgery. 2019 ; Vol. 85, No. 3. pp. E520-E526.
@article{fdc94a69d5854b62af626364aff5319b,
title = "Reoperation for proximal adjacent segment pathology in posterior cervical fusion constructs that fuse to c2 vs c3",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Few studies have described rates of proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of proximal CASP at C2 vs C3 in PCDFs for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of 380 cases of PCDF for degenerative disease with proximal constructs ending at C2 vs C3 was performed. Minimum follow-up was 12 mo. The primary outcome was proximal CASP requiring reoperation. Variable analysis included demographic, operative, and complication data. RESULTS: There were 119 patients in the C2 group and 261 in the C3 group with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, or complications. Vertebral artery injury rates were 0.8{\%} in the C2 group and 0.0{\%} in the C3 group (P =. 12). No patients in the C2 group had reoperation for proximal CASP, while 5.0{\%} of patients in the C3 group did (P =. 01). Patients with arthrodesis up to C3 had an increased risk of proximal failure when the fusion construct crossed the cervicothoracic junction (P =. 03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no factors that were independently associated with re-instrumentation for proximal CASP. CONCLUSION: Instrumenting to the C2 level reduces the risk for proximal CASP compared to fusion only up to C3. The type of instrumentation used at these 2 levels, form of ASP disease at C1-C2, and natural motion of the relevant proximal adjacent joint may contribute to this difference. Furthermore, within the C3 cohort, fusion across the cervicothoracic junction increased the risk for proximal CASP.",
keywords = "C2 pedicle screw, C3 lateral mass, Cervicothoracic junction, Proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology",
author = "Yuanxuan Xia and Risheng Xu and Kosztowski, {Thomas A.} and Seba Ramhmdani and Ahmed, {A. Karim} and Sheng-fu Lo and Ali Bydon",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/neuros/nyz019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "E520--E526",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reoperation for proximal adjacent segment pathology in posterior cervical fusion constructs that fuse to c2 vs c3

AU - Xia, Yuanxuan

AU - Xu, Risheng

AU - Kosztowski, Thomas A.

AU - Ramhmdani, Seba

AU - Ahmed, A. Karim

AU - Lo, Sheng-fu

AU - Bydon, Ali

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Few studies have described rates of proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of proximal CASP at C2 vs C3 in PCDFs for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of 380 cases of PCDF for degenerative disease with proximal constructs ending at C2 vs C3 was performed. Minimum follow-up was 12 mo. The primary outcome was proximal CASP requiring reoperation. Variable analysis included demographic, operative, and complication data. RESULTS: There were 119 patients in the C2 group and 261 in the C3 group with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, or complications. Vertebral artery injury rates were 0.8% in the C2 group and 0.0% in the C3 group (P =. 12). No patients in the C2 group had reoperation for proximal CASP, while 5.0% of patients in the C3 group did (P =. 01). Patients with arthrodesis up to C3 had an increased risk of proximal failure when the fusion construct crossed the cervicothoracic junction (P =. 03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no factors that were independently associated with re-instrumentation for proximal CASP. CONCLUSION: Instrumenting to the C2 level reduces the risk for proximal CASP compared to fusion only up to C3. The type of instrumentation used at these 2 levels, form of ASP disease at C1-C2, and natural motion of the relevant proximal adjacent joint may contribute to this difference. Furthermore, within the C3 cohort, fusion across the cervicothoracic junction increased the risk for proximal CASP.

AB - BACKGROUND: Few studies have described rates of proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates of proximal CASP at C2 vs C3 in PCDFs for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of 380 cases of PCDF for degenerative disease with proximal constructs ending at C2 vs C3 was performed. Minimum follow-up was 12 mo. The primary outcome was proximal CASP requiring reoperation. Variable analysis included demographic, operative, and complication data. RESULTS: There were 119 patients in the C2 group and 261 in the C3 group with no significant differences in age, gender, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, or complications. Vertebral artery injury rates were 0.8% in the C2 group and 0.0% in the C3 group (P =. 12). No patients in the C2 group had reoperation for proximal CASP, while 5.0% of patients in the C3 group did (P =. 01). Patients with arthrodesis up to C3 had an increased risk of proximal failure when the fusion construct crossed the cervicothoracic junction (P =. 03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no factors that were independently associated with re-instrumentation for proximal CASP. CONCLUSION: Instrumenting to the C2 level reduces the risk for proximal CASP compared to fusion only up to C3. The type of instrumentation used at these 2 levels, form of ASP disease at C1-C2, and natural motion of the relevant proximal adjacent joint may contribute to this difference. Furthermore, within the C3 cohort, fusion across the cervicothoracic junction increased the risk for proximal CASP.

KW - C2 pedicle screw

KW - C3 lateral mass

KW - Cervicothoracic junction

KW - Proximal clinical adjacent segment pathology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071522052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071522052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/neuros/nyz019

DO - 10.1093/neuros/nyz019

M3 - Article

C2 - 30860261

AN - SCOPUS:85071522052

VL - 85

SP - E520-E526

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 3

M1 - nyz019

ER -