Religious Coping and Types and Sources of Information Used in Making Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions

Janice Bowie, Caryn N. Bell, Altovise Ewing, Ballington Kinlock, Ashley Ezema, Roland J Thorpe, Thomas A. LaVeist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Treatment experiences for prostate cancer survivors can be challenging and dependent on many clinical and psychosocial factors. One area that is less understood is the information needs and sources men utilize. Among these is the influence of religion as a valid typology and the value it may have on treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between race, religion, and cancer treatment decisions in African American men compared with White men. Data were from the Diagnosis and Decisions in Prostate Cancer Treatment Outcomes Study that consisted of 877 African American and White men. The main dependent variables sought respondents’ use of resources or advisors when making treatment decisions. Questions also assessed men perceptions of prostate cancer from the perspective of religious coping. After adjusting for age, marital status, education, and insurance status, race differences in the number of sources utilized were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.46, SE = 0.012, p <.001), cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.49, SE = 0.013, p <.001), and cancer can be cured with enough prayer (β = −0.47, SE = 0.013, p <.001). Similarly, race differences in the number of advisors utilized in making the treatment decision were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006), and cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006). Religious views on prostate cancer may play an important role in explaining race differences in information used and the number of advisors utilized for treatment decision making for prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1237-1246
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Men's Health
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

source of information
Prostatic Neoplasms
coping
cancer
Religion
Neoplasms
Decision Making
Punishment
African Americans
Therapeutics
Insurance Coverage
Marital Status
faith
god
penalty
Survivors
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology
Education
psychosocial factors

Keywords

  • African American men
  • decision making
  • prostate cancer
  • religion
  • treatment decisions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Religious Coping and Types and Sources of Information Used in Making Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions. / Bowie, Janice; Bell, Caryn N.; Ewing, Altovise; Kinlock, Ballington; Ezema, Ashley; Thorpe, Roland J; LaVeist, Thomas A.

In: American Journal of Men's Health, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 1237-1246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bowie, Janice ; Bell, Caryn N. ; Ewing, Altovise ; Kinlock, Ballington ; Ezema, Ashley ; Thorpe, Roland J ; LaVeist, Thomas A. / Religious Coping and Types and Sources of Information Used in Making Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions. In: American Journal of Men's Health. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 1237-1246.
@article{2b6e035352cf475d9176826ae79a5a4b,
title = "Religious Coping and Types and Sources of Information Used in Making Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions",
abstract = "Treatment experiences for prostate cancer survivors can be challenging and dependent on many clinical and psychosocial factors. One area that is less understood is the information needs and sources men utilize. Among these is the influence of religion as a valid typology and the value it may have on treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between race, religion, and cancer treatment decisions in African American men compared with White men. Data were from the Diagnosis and Decisions in Prostate Cancer Treatment Outcomes Study that consisted of 877 African American and White men. The main dependent variables sought respondents’ use of resources or advisors when making treatment decisions. Questions also assessed men perceptions of prostate cancer from the perspective of religious coping. After adjusting for age, marital status, education, and insurance status, race differences in the number of sources utilized were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.46, SE = 0.012, p <.001), cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.49, SE = 0.013, p <.001), and cancer can be cured with enough prayer (β = −0.47, SE = 0.013, p <.001). Similarly, race differences in the number of advisors utilized in making the treatment decision were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006), and cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006). Religious views on prostate cancer may play an important role in explaining race differences in information used and the number of advisors utilized for treatment decision making for prostate cancer.",
keywords = "African American men, decision making, prostate cancer, religion, treatment decisions",
author = "Janice Bowie and Bell, {Caryn N.} and Altovise Ewing and Ballington Kinlock and Ashley Ezema and Thorpe, {Roland J} and LaVeist, {Thomas A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1557988317690977",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "1237--1246",
journal = "American Journal of Men's Health",
issn = "1557-9883",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religious Coping and Types and Sources of Information Used in Making Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions

AU - Bowie, Janice

AU - Bell, Caryn N.

AU - Ewing, Altovise

AU - Kinlock, Ballington

AU - Ezema, Ashley

AU - Thorpe, Roland J

AU - LaVeist, Thomas A.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Treatment experiences for prostate cancer survivors can be challenging and dependent on many clinical and psychosocial factors. One area that is less understood is the information needs and sources men utilize. Among these is the influence of religion as a valid typology and the value it may have on treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between race, religion, and cancer treatment decisions in African American men compared with White men. Data were from the Diagnosis and Decisions in Prostate Cancer Treatment Outcomes Study that consisted of 877 African American and White men. The main dependent variables sought respondents’ use of resources or advisors when making treatment decisions. Questions also assessed men perceptions of prostate cancer from the perspective of religious coping. After adjusting for age, marital status, education, and insurance status, race differences in the number of sources utilized were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.46, SE = 0.012, p <.001), cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.49, SE = 0.013, p <.001), and cancer can be cured with enough prayer (β = −0.47, SE = 0.013, p <.001). Similarly, race differences in the number of advisors utilized in making the treatment decision were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006), and cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006). Religious views on prostate cancer may play an important role in explaining race differences in information used and the number of advisors utilized for treatment decision making for prostate cancer.

AB - Treatment experiences for prostate cancer survivors can be challenging and dependent on many clinical and psychosocial factors. One area that is less understood is the information needs and sources men utilize. Among these is the influence of religion as a valid typology and the value it may have on treatment decisions. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between race, religion, and cancer treatment decisions in African American men compared with White men. Data were from the Diagnosis and Decisions in Prostate Cancer Treatment Outcomes Study that consisted of 877 African American and White men. The main dependent variables sought respondents’ use of resources or advisors when making treatment decisions. Questions also assessed men perceptions of prostate cancer from the perspective of religious coping. After adjusting for age, marital status, education, and insurance status, race differences in the number of sources utilized were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.46, SE = 0.012, p <.001), cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.49, SE = 0.013, p <.001), and cancer can be cured with enough prayer (β = −0.47, SE = 0.013, p <.001). Similarly, race differences in the number of advisors utilized in making the treatment decision were partially mediated by cancer was a punishment from God (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006), and cancer was a test of faith (β = −0.39, SE = 0.014, p =.006). Religious views on prostate cancer may play an important role in explaining race differences in information used and the number of advisors utilized for treatment decision making for prostate cancer.

KW - African American men

KW - decision making

KW - prostate cancer

KW - religion

KW - treatment decisions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021094242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021094242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1557988317690977

DO - 10.1177/1557988317690977

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 1237

EP - 1246

JO - American Journal of Men's Health

JF - American Journal of Men's Health

SN - 1557-9883

IS - 4

ER -