Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO©) Scores in Influenza-Positive Patients

John H. Powers, Elizabeth D. Bacci, M. Lourdes Guerrero, Nancy Kline Leidy, Sonja Stringer, Katherine Kim, Matthew J. Memoli, Alison Han, Mary P. Fairchok, Wei Ju Chen, John C. Arnold, Patrick J. Danaher, Tahaniyat Lalani, Michelande Ridoré, Timothy H. Burgess, Eugene V. Millar, Andrés Hernández, Patricia Rodríguez-Zulueta, Mary C. Smolskis, Hilda Ortega-GallegosSarah Pett, William Fischer, Daniel Gillor, Laura Moreno Macias, Anna DuVal, Richard Rothman, Andrea Dugas, Guillermo M. Ruiz-Palacios

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-218
Number of pages9
JournalValue in Health
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

Keywords

  • influenza
  • patient-reported outcome
  • psychometric
  • reliability
  • responsiveness
  • validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO©) Scores in Influenza-Positive Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this