Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology

Adam S. Bright, Brian Torpey, Donna Magid, Timothy Peter Codd, Edward G McFarland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objetive. Bigliani's classification system of acromial morphology utilizing the standard outlet radiograph has become in accepted method for evaluating patients with rotator cuff disease. This study evaluates the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Bigliani's classification system using observers at various levels of training. Patients and design. Supraspinatus outlet view radiographs of 40 patients (aged 18-78 years) with shoulder pain were reviewed twice, 4 months apart, in a masked protocol by six reviewers, including two attending (fellowship-trained) shoulder surgeons, an attending musculoskeletal radiologist, an orthopedic surgery sports fellow, and two orthopedic residents (PGY-2 and PGY-5). The reviewers were given standard diagrams of the Bigliani classification system and were asked to classify each film as a type I, II, or III acromion. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability values were calculated using kappa statistic analysis (0-0.2 slight, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.6 moderate, 0.61-0.8 substantial, and 0.8-1.0 excellent). Results and conclusion. For each of the two readings, all six observers agreed only 18% of the time. Kappa values for pairwise comparison of interobserver reliability among the six observers ranged from 0.01 to 0.75 (mean 0.35), and intraobserver repeatability ranged from 0.26 (PGY-5 resident) to 0.80 (fellowship-trained surgeon), with a mean of 0.55. Intraobserver repeatability was not significantly different for the different levels of expertise. More definitive criteria are needed to distinguish and classify the acromion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)718-721
Number of pages4
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997

Fingerprint

Acromion
Rotator Cuff
Orthopedics
Shoulder Pain
Sports
Reading
Surgeons

Keywords

  • AC joint
  • Acromion
  • Rotator cuff
  • Shoulder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology. / Bright, Adam S.; Torpey, Brian; Magid, Donna; Codd, Timothy Peter; McFarland, Edward G.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 26, No. 12, 12.1997, p. 718-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bright, Adam S. ; Torpey, Brian ; Magid, Donna ; Codd, Timothy Peter ; McFarland, Edward G. / Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology. In: Skeletal Radiology. 1997 ; Vol. 26, No. 12. pp. 718-721.
@article{6488c66efbe3476e9dbb5a039f75d3f0,
title = "Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology",
abstract = "Objetive. Bigliani's classification system of acromial morphology utilizing the standard outlet radiograph has become in accepted method for evaluating patients with rotator cuff disease. This study evaluates the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Bigliani's classification system using observers at various levels of training. Patients and design. Supraspinatus outlet view radiographs of 40 patients (aged 18-78 years) with shoulder pain were reviewed twice, 4 months apart, in a masked protocol by six reviewers, including two attending (fellowship-trained) shoulder surgeons, an attending musculoskeletal radiologist, an orthopedic surgery sports fellow, and two orthopedic residents (PGY-2 and PGY-5). The reviewers were given standard diagrams of the Bigliani classification system and were asked to classify each film as a type I, II, or III acromion. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability values were calculated using kappa statistic analysis (0-0.2 slight, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.6 moderate, 0.61-0.8 substantial, and 0.8-1.0 excellent). Results and conclusion. For each of the two readings, all six observers agreed only 18{\%} of the time. Kappa values for pairwise comparison of interobserver reliability among the six observers ranged from 0.01 to 0.75 (mean 0.35), and intraobserver repeatability ranged from 0.26 (PGY-5 resident) to 0.80 (fellowship-trained surgeon), with a mean of 0.55. Intraobserver repeatability was not significantly different for the different levels of expertise. More definitive criteria are needed to distinguish and classify the acromion.",
keywords = "AC joint, Acromion, Rotator cuff, Shoulder",
author = "Bright, {Adam S.} and Brian Torpey and Donna Magid and Codd, {Timothy Peter} and McFarland, {Edward G}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s002560050317",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "718--721",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of radiographic evaluation for acromial morphology

AU - Bright, Adam S.

AU - Torpey, Brian

AU - Magid, Donna

AU - Codd, Timothy Peter

AU - McFarland, Edward G

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - Objetive. Bigliani's classification system of acromial morphology utilizing the standard outlet radiograph has become in accepted method for evaluating patients with rotator cuff disease. This study evaluates the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Bigliani's classification system using observers at various levels of training. Patients and design. Supraspinatus outlet view radiographs of 40 patients (aged 18-78 years) with shoulder pain were reviewed twice, 4 months apart, in a masked protocol by six reviewers, including two attending (fellowship-trained) shoulder surgeons, an attending musculoskeletal radiologist, an orthopedic surgery sports fellow, and two orthopedic residents (PGY-2 and PGY-5). The reviewers were given standard diagrams of the Bigliani classification system and were asked to classify each film as a type I, II, or III acromion. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability values were calculated using kappa statistic analysis (0-0.2 slight, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.6 moderate, 0.61-0.8 substantial, and 0.8-1.0 excellent). Results and conclusion. For each of the two readings, all six observers agreed only 18% of the time. Kappa values for pairwise comparison of interobserver reliability among the six observers ranged from 0.01 to 0.75 (mean 0.35), and intraobserver repeatability ranged from 0.26 (PGY-5 resident) to 0.80 (fellowship-trained surgeon), with a mean of 0.55. Intraobserver repeatability was not significantly different for the different levels of expertise. More definitive criteria are needed to distinguish and classify the acromion.

AB - Objetive. Bigliani's classification system of acromial morphology utilizing the standard outlet radiograph has become in accepted method for evaluating patients with rotator cuff disease. This study evaluates the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Bigliani's classification system using observers at various levels of training. Patients and design. Supraspinatus outlet view radiographs of 40 patients (aged 18-78 years) with shoulder pain were reviewed twice, 4 months apart, in a masked protocol by six reviewers, including two attending (fellowship-trained) shoulder surgeons, an attending musculoskeletal radiologist, an orthopedic surgery sports fellow, and two orthopedic residents (PGY-2 and PGY-5). The reviewers were given standard diagrams of the Bigliani classification system and were asked to classify each film as a type I, II, or III acromion. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability values were calculated using kappa statistic analysis (0-0.2 slight, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.6 moderate, 0.61-0.8 substantial, and 0.8-1.0 excellent). Results and conclusion. For each of the two readings, all six observers agreed only 18% of the time. Kappa values for pairwise comparison of interobserver reliability among the six observers ranged from 0.01 to 0.75 (mean 0.35), and intraobserver repeatability ranged from 0.26 (PGY-5 resident) to 0.80 (fellowship-trained surgeon), with a mean of 0.55. Intraobserver repeatability was not significantly different for the different levels of expertise. More definitive criteria are needed to distinguish and classify the acromion.

KW - AC joint

KW - Acromion

KW - Rotator cuff

KW - Shoulder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031438157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031438157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s002560050317

DO - 10.1007/s002560050317

M3 - Article

C2 - 9453105

AN - SCOPUS:0031438157

VL - 26

SP - 718

EP - 721

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 12

ER -