Reliability of a Computerized Version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale

Jocelyn Gravel, Serge Gouin, Benoit Bailey, Michel Roy, Sylvie Bergeron, Devendra Amre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The use of a standardized triage tool allows better comparison of the patients; a computerized version could theoretically improve its reliability. Objectives: To compare the interrater agreement of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS) and a computerized version (Staturg). Methods: A two-phase experimental study was conducted to compare the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage level to written case scenarios using either traditional PedCTAS or Staturg. Participants were nurses with at least one year of experience in pediatric emergency medicine and trained at triage. Each of the 54 scenarios was evaluated first by all nurses using either one of the strategies. Four weeks later, they evaluated the same scenarios using the other tool. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement measured using κ score. Results: Eighteen of the 29 eligible nurses participated in the study. The computerized triage tool showed a better interrater agreement, with a Staturg κ score of 0.55 (95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.57) versus a PedCTAS κ score of 0.51 (95% confidence interval = 0.49 to 0.53). The computerized version was also associated with higher agreements for scenarios describing patients with the highest severity of triage (κ score of 0.72 vs. 0.55 for level 1; κ score of 0.70 vs. 0.51 for level 2). Conclusions: A computerized version of the PedCTAS showed a statistically significant improvement in the interrater agreement for nurses evaluating the triage level of 54 clinical scenarios, but this difference has probably small clinical significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)864-869
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Triage
Pediatrics
Nurses
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • computerized system
  • emergency department
  • pediatric
  • triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Reliability of a Computerized Version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. / Gravel, Jocelyn; Gouin, Serge; Bailey, Benoit; Roy, Michel; Bergeron, Sylvie; Amre, Devendra.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 864-869.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gravel, J, Gouin, S, Bailey, B, Roy, M, Bergeron, S & Amre, D 2007, 'Reliability of a Computerized Version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 864-869. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.018
Gravel, Jocelyn ; Gouin, Serge ; Bailey, Benoit ; Roy, Michel ; Bergeron, Sylvie ; Amre, Devendra. / Reliability of a Computerized Version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 10. pp. 864-869.
@article{52791f7cb7174f9eab81025e97c6e600,
title = "Reliability of a Computerized Version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale",
abstract = "Background: The use of a standardized triage tool allows better comparison of the patients; a computerized version could theoretically improve its reliability. Objectives: To compare the interrater agreement of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS) and a computerized version (Staturg). Methods: A two-phase experimental study was conducted to compare the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage level to written case scenarios using either traditional PedCTAS or Staturg. Participants were nurses with at least one year of experience in pediatric emergency medicine and trained at triage. Each of the 54 scenarios was evaluated first by all nurses using either one of the strategies. Four weeks later, they evaluated the same scenarios using the other tool. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement measured using κ score. Results: Eighteen of the 29 eligible nurses participated in the study. The computerized triage tool showed a better interrater agreement, with a Staturg κ score of 0.55 (95{\%} confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.57) versus a PedCTAS κ score of 0.51 (95{\%} confidence interval = 0.49 to 0.53). The computerized version was also associated with higher agreements for scenarios describing patients with the highest severity of triage (κ score of 0.72 vs. 0.55 for level 1; κ score of 0.70 vs. 0.51 for level 2). Conclusions: A computerized version of the PedCTAS showed a statistically significant improvement in the interrater agreement for nurses evaluating the triage level of 54 clinical scenarios, but this difference has probably small clinical significance.",
keywords = "computerized system, emergency department, pediatric, triage",
author = "Jocelyn Gravel and Serge Gouin and Benoit Bailey and Michel Roy and Sylvie Bergeron and Devendra Amre",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "864--869",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of a Computerized Version of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale

AU - Gravel, Jocelyn

AU - Gouin, Serge

AU - Bailey, Benoit

AU - Roy, Michel

AU - Bergeron, Sylvie

AU - Amre, Devendra

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Background: The use of a standardized triage tool allows better comparison of the patients; a computerized version could theoretically improve its reliability. Objectives: To compare the interrater agreement of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS) and a computerized version (Staturg). Methods: A two-phase experimental study was conducted to compare the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage level to written case scenarios using either traditional PedCTAS or Staturg. Participants were nurses with at least one year of experience in pediatric emergency medicine and trained at triage. Each of the 54 scenarios was evaluated first by all nurses using either one of the strategies. Four weeks later, they evaluated the same scenarios using the other tool. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement measured using κ score. Results: Eighteen of the 29 eligible nurses participated in the study. The computerized triage tool showed a better interrater agreement, with a Staturg κ score of 0.55 (95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.57) versus a PedCTAS κ score of 0.51 (95% confidence interval = 0.49 to 0.53). The computerized version was also associated with higher agreements for scenarios describing patients with the highest severity of triage (κ score of 0.72 vs. 0.55 for level 1; κ score of 0.70 vs. 0.51 for level 2). Conclusions: A computerized version of the PedCTAS showed a statistically significant improvement in the interrater agreement for nurses evaluating the triage level of 54 clinical scenarios, but this difference has probably small clinical significance.

AB - Background: The use of a standardized triage tool allows better comparison of the patients; a computerized version could theoretically improve its reliability. Objectives: To compare the interrater agreement of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (PedCTAS) and a computerized version (Staturg). Methods: A two-phase experimental study was conducted to compare the interrater agreement between nurses assigning triage level to written case scenarios using either traditional PedCTAS or Staturg. Participants were nurses with at least one year of experience in pediatric emergency medicine and trained at triage. Each of the 54 scenarios was evaluated first by all nurses using either one of the strategies. Four weeks later, they evaluated the same scenarios using the other tool. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement measured using κ score. Results: Eighteen of the 29 eligible nurses participated in the study. The computerized triage tool showed a better interrater agreement, with a Staturg κ score of 0.55 (95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.57) versus a PedCTAS κ score of 0.51 (95% confidence interval = 0.49 to 0.53). The computerized version was also associated with higher agreements for scenarios describing patients with the highest severity of triage (κ score of 0.72 vs. 0.55 for level 1; κ score of 0.70 vs. 0.51 for level 2). Conclusions: A computerized version of the PedCTAS showed a statistically significant improvement in the interrater agreement for nurses evaluating the triage level of 54 clinical scenarios, but this difference has probably small clinical significance.

KW - computerized system

KW - emergency department

KW - pediatric

KW - triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548730243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548730243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.018

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 17761546

AN - SCOPUS:34548730243

VL - 14

SP - 864

EP - 869

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 10

ER -