Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS)

Julie LaMothe, Diane M. Billings, Anne E Belcher, Karen Cobb, Ann Nice, Virginia Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study was conducted to establish the reliability and validity of the Dunn, Dunn, and Price Productivity Environmental Preferences Survey (PEPS) with baccalaureate nursing students and to identify differences between subpopulations(age, class level, sex, type of student (RN versus generic)) and students at risk. The findings have implications for nurse educators who choose teaching-learning experiences for a diverse student population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-35
Number of pages2
JournalNurse Educator
Volume16
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
productivity
Students
Efficiency
student
Nursing Students
Teaching
Nurses
Learning
nursing
nurse
educator
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires
learning
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fundamentals and skills
  • LPN and LVN
  • Review and Exam Preparation
  • Education
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

LaMothe, J., Billings, D. M., Belcher, A. E., Cobb, K., Nice, A., & Richardson, V. (1991). Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS). Nurse Educator, 16(4), 34-35.

Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS). / LaMothe, Julie; Billings, Diane M.; Belcher, Anne E; Cobb, Karen; Nice, Ann; Richardson, Virginia.

In: Nurse Educator, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1991, p. 34-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LaMothe, J, Billings, DM, Belcher, AE, Cobb, K, Nice, A & Richardson, V 1991, 'Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS)', Nurse Educator, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 34-35.
LaMothe J, Billings DM, Belcher AE, Cobb K, Nice A, Richardson V. Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS). Nurse Educator. 1991;16(4):34-35.
LaMothe, Julie ; Billings, Diane M. ; Belcher, Anne E ; Cobb, Karen ; Nice, Ann ; Richardson, Virginia. / Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS). In: Nurse Educator. 1991 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 34-35.
@article{7c3c6c47bd844a479980c641f82bdb5c,
title = "Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS)",
abstract = "This study was conducted to establish the reliability and validity of the Dunn, Dunn, and Price Productivity Environmental Preferences Survey (PEPS) with baccalaureate nursing students and to identify differences between subpopulations(age, class level, sex, type of student (RN versus generic)) and students at risk. The findings have implications for nurse educators who choose teaching-learning experiences for a diverse student population.",
author = "Julie LaMothe and Billings, {Diane M.} and Belcher, {Anne E} and Karen Cobb and Ann Nice and Virginia Richardson",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "34--35",
journal = "Nurse Educator",
issn = "0363-3624",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of the productivity environmental preference survey(PEPS)

AU - LaMothe, Julie

AU - Billings, Diane M.

AU - Belcher, Anne E

AU - Cobb, Karen

AU - Nice, Ann

AU - Richardson, Virginia

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - This study was conducted to establish the reliability and validity of the Dunn, Dunn, and Price Productivity Environmental Preferences Survey (PEPS) with baccalaureate nursing students and to identify differences between subpopulations(age, class level, sex, type of student (RN versus generic)) and students at risk. The findings have implications for nurse educators who choose teaching-learning experiences for a diverse student population.

AB - This study was conducted to establish the reliability and validity of the Dunn, Dunn, and Price Productivity Environmental Preferences Survey (PEPS) with baccalaureate nursing students and to identify differences between subpopulations(age, class level, sex, type of student (RN versus generic)) and students at risk. The findings have implications for nurse educators who choose teaching-learning experiences for a diverse student population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026198034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026198034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1866094

AN - SCOPUS:0026198034

VL - 16

SP - 34

EP - 35

JO - Nurse Educator

JF - Nurse Educator

SN - 0363-3624

IS - 4

ER -