Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance

Deborah E. Lechner, James R. Jackson, David L. Roth, Karin V. Straaton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the interrater reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work abilities, the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. Eleven physical therapists were trained to administer and score this evaluation. From this group, two therapists at a time simultaneously and independently evaluated 50 patients with musculoskeletal disorders as they performed the tasks of the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. At the conclusion of the evaluation, each therapist determined the safe level of physical work for each patient. A comparison of the two independent evaluations was used to determine reliability. To determine validity, the predicted level of work was compared with the actual level of work. Kappa coefficient between the two therapists on the level of work was.83. Spearman rho correlations between the predicted and actual levels of work ranged from.41 to.55. Only 14 to 18% were working above the level predicted by the Physical Work Performance Evaluation. These results indicate high interrater reliability. Given the lack of a perfect standard for validity comparisons, these results also provide evidence in support of convergent validity. The test can be used in making decisions regarding return to work after injury, preemployment placement, and vocational exploration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)997-1004
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Occupational Medicine
Volume36
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1994
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this