Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners

Leonid M. Litvak, Anthony J. Spahr, Aniket A. Saoji, Gene Y. Fridman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

127 Scopus citations

Abstract

Spectral resolution has been reported to be closely related to vowel and consonant recognition in cochlear implant (CI) listeners. One measure of spectral resolution is spectral modulation threshold (SMT), which is defined as the smallest detectable spectral contrast in the spectral ripple stimulus. SMT may be determined by the activation pattern associated with electrical stimulation. In the present study, broad activation patterns were simulated using a multi-band vocoder to determine if similar impairments in speech understanding scores could be produced in normal-hearing listeners. Tokens were first decomposed into 15 logarithmically spaced bands and then re-synthesized by multiplying the envelope of each band by matched filtered noise. Various amounts of current spread were simulated by adjusting the drop-off of the noise spectrum away from the peak (40- 5 dBoctave). The average SMT (0.25 and 0.5 cyclesoctave) increased from 6.3 to 22.5 dB, while average vowel identification scores dropped from 86% to 19% and consonant identification scores dropped from 93% to 59%. In each condition, the impairments in speech understanding were generally similar to those found in CI listeners with similar SMTs, suggesting that variability in spread of neural activation largely accounts for the variability in speech perception of CI listeners.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)982-991
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume122
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this