Relationship between opioid prescribing patterns and claim duration and cost

Robert A. Lavin, Xuguang Tao, Larry Yuspeh, Nimisha Kalia, Edward J. Bernacki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between timing and duration of opioid prescriptions, disability duration, and claims costs for work-related injuries. Method: A retrospective cohort study using lost time compensation claimant data to examine the relationship between opioid prescription patterns and claim duration and cost. Logistic regression adjusted for sex, marital status, initial reserve, attorney involvement, and spinal surgeries. Results: Odds ratios for claim cost at least $100,000 and duration at least 3 years were not statistically different between groups prescribed opioids less than 30 days and those not prescribed opioids. Claims with short-acting opioids continued after 180 days; the odds ratios for claim cost at least $100,000 and duration at least 3 years were 6.21 (95% confidence interval 5.30 to 7.28) and 3.32 (95% confidence interval 2.94 to 3.74). Conclusion: Claim cost and lost time are related to when and how long opioids are prescribed for work-related injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e90-e93
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental medicine
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between opioid prescribing patterns and claim duration and cost'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this