Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores

Danny McCormick, David U. Himmelstein, Steffie Woolhandler, Sidney M. Wolfe, David H. Bor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Public disclosure of quality data on health maintenance organizations (HMOs) might improve public accountability, inform consumer decision making, and promote quality improvement. But, because disclosure is voluntary, some HMOs could subvert these objectives by refusing to release unfavorable data. Objective: To determine the association between HMO quality of care and withdrawal from public disclosure of quality-of-care data the subsequent year. Design and Setting: Retrospective cohort study of administrative and quality-of-care data on HMOs from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) annual Quality Compass databases for 1997, 1998, and 1999, including Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality scores. Main Outcome Measure: One-year rates of HMO withdrawal from public disclosure of HEDIS scores for plans in the highest and lowest tertiles of HEDIS scores, adjusted for method of data collection and plan model type. Results: Of the 329 HMOs that publicly disclosed HEDIS scores in 1997, 161 plans (49%) withdrew from public disclosure in 1998. Of the 292 HMOs that disclosed their scores in 1998 (including 130 newly participating plans), 67 plans (23%) withdrew from public disclosure in 1999. Plans whose scores ranked in the lowest-quality tertile were much more likely than plans ranking in the highest-quality tertile to withdraw from public disclosure in 1998 (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-7.0) and 1999 (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.7-17.7). Conclusion: Compared with HMOs receiving higher quality-of-care scores, lower-scoring plans are more likely to stop disclosing their quality data. Voluntary reporting of quality data by HMOs is ineffective; selective nondisclosure undermines both informed consumer decision making and public accountability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1484-1490
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume288
Issue number12
StatePublished - Sep 25 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Maintenance Organizations
Quality of Health Care
Disclosure
Social Responsibility
Decision Making
Health
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Quality Improvement
Cohort Studies
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Public Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

McCormick, D., Himmelstein, D. U., Woolhandler, S., Wolfe, S. M., & Bor, D. H. (2002). Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(12), 1484-1490.

Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores. / McCormick, Danny; Himmelstein, David U.; Woolhandler, Steffie; Wolfe, Sidney M.; Bor, David H.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 288, No. 12, 25.09.2002, p. 1484-1490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCormick, D, Himmelstein, DU, Woolhandler, S, Wolfe, SM & Bor, DH 2002, 'Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 288, no. 12, pp. 1484-1490.
McCormick, Danny ; Himmelstein, David U. ; Woolhandler, Steffie ; Wolfe, Sidney M. ; Bor, David H. / Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 ; Vol. 288, No. 12. pp. 1484-1490.
@article{6414bfacf9a441e8a1002d4c71c6925a,
title = "Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores",
abstract = "Context: Public disclosure of quality data on health maintenance organizations (HMOs) might improve public accountability, inform consumer decision making, and promote quality improvement. But, because disclosure is voluntary, some HMOs could subvert these objectives by refusing to release unfavorable data. Objective: To determine the association between HMO quality of care and withdrawal from public disclosure of quality-of-care data the subsequent year. Design and Setting: Retrospective cohort study of administrative and quality-of-care data on HMOs from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) annual Quality Compass databases for 1997, 1998, and 1999, including Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality scores. Main Outcome Measure: One-year rates of HMO withdrawal from public disclosure of HEDIS scores for plans in the highest and lowest tertiles of HEDIS scores, adjusted for method of data collection and plan model type. Results: Of the 329 HMOs that publicly disclosed HEDIS scores in 1997, 161 plans (49{\%}) withdrew from public disclosure in 1998. Of the 292 HMOs that disclosed their scores in 1998 (including 130 newly participating plans), 67 plans (23{\%}) withdrew from public disclosure in 1999. Plans whose scores ranked in the lowest-quality tertile were much more likely than plans ranking in the highest-quality tertile to withdraw from public disclosure in 1998 (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 2.1-7.0) and 1999 (OR, 5.7; 95{\%} CI, 2.7-17.7). Conclusion: Compared with HMOs receiving higher quality-of-care scores, lower-scoring plans are more likely to stop disclosing their quality data. Voluntary reporting of quality data by HMOs is ineffective; selective nondisclosure undermines both informed consumer decision making and public accountability.",
author = "Danny McCormick and Himmelstein, {David U.} and Steffie Woolhandler and Wolfe, {Sidney M.} and Bor, {David H.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "288",
pages = "1484--1490",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0098-7484",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between low quality-of-care scores and HMOs' subsequent public disclosure of quality-of-care scores

AU - McCormick, Danny

AU - Himmelstein, David U.

AU - Woolhandler, Steffie

AU - Wolfe, Sidney M.

AU - Bor, David H.

PY - 2002/9/25

Y1 - 2002/9/25

N2 - Context: Public disclosure of quality data on health maintenance organizations (HMOs) might improve public accountability, inform consumer decision making, and promote quality improvement. But, because disclosure is voluntary, some HMOs could subvert these objectives by refusing to release unfavorable data. Objective: To determine the association between HMO quality of care and withdrawal from public disclosure of quality-of-care data the subsequent year. Design and Setting: Retrospective cohort study of administrative and quality-of-care data on HMOs from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) annual Quality Compass databases for 1997, 1998, and 1999, including Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality scores. Main Outcome Measure: One-year rates of HMO withdrawal from public disclosure of HEDIS scores for plans in the highest and lowest tertiles of HEDIS scores, adjusted for method of data collection and plan model type. Results: Of the 329 HMOs that publicly disclosed HEDIS scores in 1997, 161 plans (49%) withdrew from public disclosure in 1998. Of the 292 HMOs that disclosed their scores in 1998 (including 130 newly participating plans), 67 plans (23%) withdrew from public disclosure in 1999. Plans whose scores ranked in the lowest-quality tertile were much more likely than plans ranking in the highest-quality tertile to withdraw from public disclosure in 1998 (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-7.0) and 1999 (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.7-17.7). Conclusion: Compared with HMOs receiving higher quality-of-care scores, lower-scoring plans are more likely to stop disclosing their quality data. Voluntary reporting of quality data by HMOs is ineffective; selective nondisclosure undermines both informed consumer decision making and public accountability.

AB - Context: Public disclosure of quality data on health maintenance organizations (HMOs) might improve public accountability, inform consumer decision making, and promote quality improvement. But, because disclosure is voluntary, some HMOs could subvert these objectives by refusing to release unfavorable data. Objective: To determine the association between HMO quality of care and withdrawal from public disclosure of quality-of-care data the subsequent year. Design and Setting: Retrospective cohort study of administrative and quality-of-care data on HMOs from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) annual Quality Compass databases for 1997, 1998, and 1999, including Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality scores. Main Outcome Measure: One-year rates of HMO withdrawal from public disclosure of HEDIS scores for plans in the highest and lowest tertiles of HEDIS scores, adjusted for method of data collection and plan model type. Results: Of the 329 HMOs that publicly disclosed HEDIS scores in 1997, 161 plans (49%) withdrew from public disclosure in 1998. Of the 292 HMOs that disclosed their scores in 1998 (including 130 newly participating plans), 67 plans (23%) withdrew from public disclosure in 1999. Plans whose scores ranked in the lowest-quality tertile were much more likely than plans ranking in the highest-quality tertile to withdraw from public disclosure in 1998 (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-7.0) and 1999 (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.7-17.7). Conclusion: Compared with HMOs receiving higher quality-of-care scores, lower-scoring plans are more likely to stop disclosing their quality data. Voluntary reporting of quality data by HMOs is ineffective; selective nondisclosure undermines both informed consumer decision making and public accountability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037174347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037174347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 288

SP - 1484

EP - 1490

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0098-7484

IS - 12

ER -