Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking

Uma Rao, Tanuj Sidhartha, Karen R. Harker, Anup S. Bidesi, Li Ann Chen, Monique Ernst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of the study was to assess individual differences among adolescents regarding risk-taking behavior in the laboratory. The second aim was to evaluate whether the laboratory-based risk-taking behavior is associated with other behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Methods: A total of 82 adolescents with no personal history of psychiatric disorder completed a computerized decision-making task, the Wheel of Fortune. On the basis of the choices made between clearly defined probabilities and real monetary outcomes, this task assesses risk preferences when participants are confronted with potential rewards and losses. The participants also completed a variety of behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Results: Performance on the task varied on the basis of probability and anticipated outcomes. In the winning sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude reward (high-risk choice) less frequently than high-probabilitylow-magnitude reward (low-risk choice). In the losing sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude loss more often than high-probabilitylow-magnitude loss. On average, the selection of probabilistic rewards was optimal and similar to performance in adults. There were, however, individual differences in performance, and one-third of the adolescents made high-risk choice more frequently than low-risk choice while selecting a reward. After controlling for sociodemographic and psychological variables, high-risk choice on the winning task predicted "real-world" risk-taking behavior and substance-related problems. Conclusions: These findings highlight individual differences in risk-taking behavior. Regarding validity of the Wheel of Fortune task, the preliminary data suggest that it might be a valuable laboratory tool for studying behavioral and neurobiological processes associated with risk-taking behavior in adolescents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-158
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Risk-Taking
Reward
Individuality
Psychology
Adolescent Behavior
Task Performance and Analysis
Psychiatry
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Decision-making
  • Punishment
  • Reward
  • Risky behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking. / Rao, Uma; Sidhartha, Tanuj; Harker, Karen R.; Bidesi, Anup S.; Chen, Li Ann; Ernst, Monique.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 48, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 151-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rao, Uma ; Sidhartha, Tanuj ; Harker, Karen R. ; Bidesi, Anup S. ; Chen, Li Ann ; Ernst, Monique. / Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking. In: Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 151-158.
@article{036a7afbc4494b2384545687ccd36edd,
title = "Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking",
abstract = "Purpose: The goal of the study was to assess individual differences among adolescents regarding risk-taking behavior in the laboratory. The second aim was to evaluate whether the laboratory-based risk-taking behavior is associated with other behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Methods: A total of 82 adolescents with no personal history of psychiatric disorder completed a computerized decision-making task, the Wheel of Fortune. On the basis of the choices made between clearly defined probabilities and real monetary outcomes, this task assesses risk preferences when participants are confronted with potential rewards and losses. The participants also completed a variety of behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Results: Performance on the task varied on the basis of probability and anticipated outcomes. In the winning sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude reward (high-risk choice) less frequently than high-probabilitylow-magnitude reward (low-risk choice). In the losing sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude loss more often than high-probabilitylow-magnitude loss. On average, the selection of probabilistic rewards was optimal and similar to performance in adults. There were, however, individual differences in performance, and one-third of the adolescents made high-risk choice more frequently than low-risk choice while selecting a reward. After controlling for sociodemographic and psychological variables, high-risk choice on the winning task predicted {"}real-world{"} risk-taking behavior and substance-related problems. Conclusions: These findings highlight individual differences in risk-taking behavior. Regarding validity of the Wheel of Fortune task, the preliminary data suggest that it might be a valuable laboratory tool for studying behavioral and neurobiological processes associated with risk-taking behavior in adolescents.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Decision-making, Punishment, Reward, Risky behavior",
author = "Uma Rao and Tanuj Sidhartha and Harker, {Karen R.} and Bidesi, {Anup S.} and Chen, {Li Ann} and Monique Ernst",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "151--158",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between adolescent risk preferences on a laboratory task and behavioral measures of risk-taking

AU - Rao, Uma

AU - Sidhartha, Tanuj

AU - Harker, Karen R.

AU - Bidesi, Anup S.

AU - Chen, Li Ann

AU - Ernst, Monique

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Purpose: The goal of the study was to assess individual differences among adolescents regarding risk-taking behavior in the laboratory. The second aim was to evaluate whether the laboratory-based risk-taking behavior is associated with other behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Methods: A total of 82 adolescents with no personal history of psychiatric disorder completed a computerized decision-making task, the Wheel of Fortune. On the basis of the choices made between clearly defined probabilities and real monetary outcomes, this task assesses risk preferences when participants are confronted with potential rewards and losses. The participants also completed a variety of behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Results: Performance on the task varied on the basis of probability and anticipated outcomes. In the winning sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude reward (high-risk choice) less frequently than high-probabilitylow-magnitude reward (low-risk choice). In the losing sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude loss more often than high-probabilitylow-magnitude loss. On average, the selection of probabilistic rewards was optimal and similar to performance in adults. There were, however, individual differences in performance, and one-third of the adolescents made high-risk choice more frequently than low-risk choice while selecting a reward. After controlling for sociodemographic and psychological variables, high-risk choice on the winning task predicted "real-world" risk-taking behavior and substance-related problems. Conclusions: These findings highlight individual differences in risk-taking behavior. Regarding validity of the Wheel of Fortune task, the preliminary data suggest that it might be a valuable laboratory tool for studying behavioral and neurobiological processes associated with risk-taking behavior in adolescents.

AB - Purpose: The goal of the study was to assess individual differences among adolescents regarding risk-taking behavior in the laboratory. The second aim was to evaluate whether the laboratory-based risk-taking behavior is associated with other behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Methods: A total of 82 adolescents with no personal history of psychiatric disorder completed a computerized decision-making task, the Wheel of Fortune. On the basis of the choices made between clearly defined probabilities and real monetary outcomes, this task assesses risk preferences when participants are confronted with potential rewards and losses. The participants also completed a variety of behavioral and psychological measures associated with risk-taking behavior. Results: Performance on the task varied on the basis of probability and anticipated outcomes. In the winning sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude reward (high-risk choice) less frequently than high-probabilitylow-magnitude reward (low-risk choice). In the losing sub-task, participants selected low-probabilityhigh-magnitude loss more often than high-probabilitylow-magnitude loss. On average, the selection of probabilistic rewards was optimal and similar to performance in adults. There were, however, individual differences in performance, and one-third of the adolescents made high-risk choice more frequently than low-risk choice while selecting a reward. After controlling for sociodemographic and psychological variables, high-risk choice on the winning task predicted "real-world" risk-taking behavior and substance-related problems. Conclusions: These findings highlight individual differences in risk-taking behavior. Regarding validity of the Wheel of Fortune task, the preliminary data suggest that it might be a valuable laboratory tool for studying behavioral and neurobiological processes associated with risk-taking behavior in adolescents.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Decision-making

KW - Punishment

KW - Reward

KW - Risky behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79151481851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79151481851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.06.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 21257113

AN - SCOPUS:79151481851

VL - 48

SP - 151

EP - 158

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 2

ER -