Regulating recognition and training for new medical specialties in India: The case of emergency medicine

Veena Sriram, Rama Baru, Sara Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Regulation is essential to health systems and is central to advancing equity-oriented policy objectives in health. Regulating new medical specialties is an emerging, yet underexplored, aspect of health sector governance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as India. Limited research exists regarding how regulatory institutions in India decide what specialties should be formally recognized and how training programmes for these specialties should be organized. Understanding these regulatory functions provides a lens into how policymakers envision the role of these specialties in the broader health system and how they view the linkages between medical education, health system needs and equity. Drawing upon the recent development of emergency medicine in India, the goal of this study was to understand how recognition and training for new medical specialties are regulated in India. Building on previous frameworks, we examined the institutions, functions, enforcement, mechanisms and institutional relationships that make up the regulatory architecture, and situated our analysis in historical context. Two data sources were iteratively utilized: document review (n=93) and in-depth interviews (n=87). Our analysis reveals a plurality of institutions involved in regulating recognition and training for new medical specialties in India, characterized by a lack of coordination, limited collaboration and weak accountability. We also found an absence of clear responsibility for the systematic, planned development of specialties, particularly in terms of health system in strengthening and achieving health equity. As medical specialization continues to shape health systems in LMICs, further streamlining and coordination in the regulatory system will enable policymakers, researchers, practitioners and civil society to proactively plan for how these specialties can better integrate with health systems, and to advance their contribution to improving health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)840-852
Number of pages13
JournalHealth policy and planning
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Keywords

  • Education
  • Mapping
  • Policy analysis
  • Qualitative research
  • Regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating recognition and training for new medical specialties in India: The case of emergency medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this