Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging

Stefano Marenco, Robert Rawlings, Gustavo K. Rohde, Alan S. Barnett, Robyn A. Honea, Carlo Pierpaoli, Daniel Weinberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The characterization of measurement error is critical in assessing the significance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings in longitudinal and cohort studies of psychiatric disorders. We studied 20 healthy volunteers, each one scanned twice (average interval between scans of 51 ± 46.8 days) with a single shot echo planar DTI technique. Intersession variability for fractional anisotropy (FA) and Trace (D) was represented as absolute variation (standard deviation within subjects: SDw), percent coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The values from the two sessions were compared for statistical significance with repeated measures analysis of variance or a non-parametric equivalent of a paired t-test. The results showed good reproducibility for both FA and Trace (CVs below 10% and ICCs at or above 0.70 in most regions of interest) and evidence of systematic global changes in Trace between scans. The regional distribution of reproducibility described here has implications for the interpretation of regional findings and for rigorous pre-processing. The regional distribution of reproducibility measures was different for SDw, CV and ICC. Each one of these measures reveals complementary information that needs to be taken into consideration when performing statistical operations on groups of DT images.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-78
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatry Research - Neuroimaging
Volume147
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 30 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Anisotropy
Psychiatry
Longitudinal Studies
Analysis of Variance
Healthy Volunteers
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • Fractional anisotropy
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Mean diffusivity
  • Reproducibility
  • Statistical analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging. / Marenco, Stefano; Rawlings, Robert; Rohde, Gustavo K.; Barnett, Alan S.; Honea, Robyn A.; Pierpaoli, Carlo; Weinberger, Daniel.

In: Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging, Vol. 147, No. 1, 30.06.2006, p. 69-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marenco, S, Rawlings, R, Rohde, GK, Barnett, AS, Honea, RA, Pierpaoli, C & Weinberger, D 2006, 'Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging', Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.008
Marenco S, Rawlings R, Rohde GK, Barnett AS, Honea RA, Pierpaoli C et al. Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging. Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging. 2006 Jun 30;147(1):69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.008
Marenco, Stefano ; Rawlings, Robert ; Rohde, Gustavo K. ; Barnett, Alan S. ; Honea, Robyn A. ; Pierpaoli, Carlo ; Weinberger, Daniel. / Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging. In: Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging. 2006 ; Vol. 147, No. 1. pp. 69-78.
@article{88b31729d5eb4cf18175cdc6a21aac1f,
title = "Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging",
abstract = "The characterization of measurement error is critical in assessing the significance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings in longitudinal and cohort studies of psychiatric disorders. We studied 20 healthy volunteers, each one scanned twice (average interval between scans of 51 ± 46.8 days) with a single shot echo planar DTI technique. Intersession variability for fractional anisotropy (FA) and Trace (D) was represented as absolute variation (standard deviation within subjects: SDw), percent coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The values from the two sessions were compared for statistical significance with repeated measures analysis of variance or a non-parametric equivalent of a paired t-test. The results showed good reproducibility for both FA and Trace (CVs below 10{\%} and ICCs at or above 0.70 in most regions of interest) and evidence of systematic global changes in Trace between scans. The regional distribution of reproducibility described here has implications for the interpretation of regional findings and for rigorous pre-processing. The regional distribution of reproducibility measures was different for SDw, CV and ICC. Each one of these measures reveals complementary information that needs to be taken into consideration when performing statistical operations on groups of DT images.",
keywords = "Fractional anisotropy, Magnetic resonance imaging, Mean diffusivity, Reproducibility, Statistical analysis",
author = "Stefano Marenco and Robert Rawlings and Rohde, {Gustavo K.} and Barnett, {Alan S.} and Honea, {Robyn A.} and Carlo Pierpaoli and Daniel Weinberger",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "69--78",
journal = "Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging",
issn = "0925-4927",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging

AU - Marenco, Stefano

AU - Rawlings, Robert

AU - Rohde, Gustavo K.

AU - Barnett, Alan S.

AU - Honea, Robyn A.

AU - Pierpaoli, Carlo

AU - Weinberger, Daniel

PY - 2006/6/30

Y1 - 2006/6/30

N2 - The characterization of measurement error is critical in assessing the significance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings in longitudinal and cohort studies of psychiatric disorders. We studied 20 healthy volunteers, each one scanned twice (average interval between scans of 51 ± 46.8 days) with a single shot echo planar DTI technique. Intersession variability for fractional anisotropy (FA) and Trace (D) was represented as absolute variation (standard deviation within subjects: SDw), percent coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The values from the two sessions were compared for statistical significance with repeated measures analysis of variance or a non-parametric equivalent of a paired t-test. The results showed good reproducibility for both FA and Trace (CVs below 10% and ICCs at or above 0.70 in most regions of interest) and evidence of systematic global changes in Trace between scans. The regional distribution of reproducibility described here has implications for the interpretation of regional findings and for rigorous pre-processing. The regional distribution of reproducibility measures was different for SDw, CV and ICC. Each one of these measures reveals complementary information that needs to be taken into consideration when performing statistical operations on groups of DT images.

AB - The characterization of measurement error is critical in assessing the significance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) findings in longitudinal and cohort studies of psychiatric disorders. We studied 20 healthy volunteers, each one scanned twice (average interval between scans of 51 ± 46.8 days) with a single shot echo planar DTI technique. Intersession variability for fractional anisotropy (FA) and Trace (D) was represented as absolute variation (standard deviation within subjects: SDw), percent coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The values from the two sessions were compared for statistical significance with repeated measures analysis of variance or a non-parametric equivalent of a paired t-test. The results showed good reproducibility for both FA and Trace (CVs below 10% and ICCs at or above 0.70 in most regions of interest) and evidence of systematic global changes in Trace between scans. The regional distribution of reproducibility described here has implications for the interpretation of regional findings and for rigorous pre-processing. The regional distribution of reproducibility measures was different for SDw, CV and ICC. Each one of these measures reveals complementary information that needs to be taken into consideration when performing statistical operations on groups of DT images.

KW - Fractional anisotropy

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Mean diffusivity

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Statistical analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746190656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746190656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 16797169

AN - SCOPUS:33746190656

VL - 147

SP - 69

EP - 78

JO - Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging

JF - Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging

SN - 0925-4927

IS - 1

ER -