Refining surge capacity

Conventional, contingency, and crisis capacity

John L. Hick, Joseph A. Barbera, Gabor D Kelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Health care facility surge capacity has received significant planning attention recently, but there is no commonly accepted framework for detailed, phased surge capacity categorization and implementation. This article proposes a taxonomy within surge capacity of conventional capacity (implemented in major mass casualty incidents and representing care as usually provided at the institution), contingency capacity (using adaptations to medical care spaces, staffing constraints, and supply shortages without significant impact on delivered medical care), and crisis capacity (implemented in catastrophic situations with a significant impact on standard of care). Suggested measurements used to gauge a quantifiable component of surge capacity and adaptive strategies for staff and supply challenges are proposed. The use of refined definitions of surge capacity as it relates to space, staffing, and supply concerns during a mass casualty incident may aid phased implementation of surge capacity plans at health care facilities and enhance the consistency of terminology and data collection between facilities and regions. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S59-S67)

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Volume3
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Surge Capacity
Mass Casualty Incidents
Health Facilities
Delivery of Health Care
Disasters
Standard of Care
Terminology
Public Health

Keywords

  • Disaster
  • Emergency management
  • Emergency preparedness
  • Hospital preparedness
  • Surge capacity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Refining surge capacity : Conventional, contingency, and crisis capacity. / Hick, John L.; Barbera, Joseph A.; Kelen, Gabor D.

In: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Vol. 3, No. SUPPL. 1, 06.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{913cae9d0010404b9775a78233de5447,
title = "Refining surge capacity: Conventional, contingency, and crisis capacity",
abstract = "Health care facility surge capacity has received significant planning attention recently, but there is no commonly accepted framework for detailed, phased surge capacity categorization and implementation. This article proposes a taxonomy within surge capacity of conventional capacity (implemented in major mass casualty incidents and representing care as usually provided at the institution), contingency capacity (using adaptations to medical care spaces, staffing constraints, and supply shortages without significant impact on delivered medical care), and crisis capacity (implemented in catastrophic situations with a significant impact on standard of care). Suggested measurements used to gauge a quantifiable component of surge capacity and adaptive strategies for staff and supply challenges are proposed. The use of refined definitions of surge capacity as it relates to space, staffing, and supply concerns during a mass casualty incident may aid phased implementation of surge capacity plans at health care facilities and enhance the consistency of terminology and data collection between facilities and regions. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S59-S67)",
keywords = "Disaster, Emergency management, Emergency preparedness, Hospital preparedness, Surge capacity",
author = "Hick, {John L.} and Barbera, {Joseph A.} and Kelen, {Gabor D}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f1ae2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness",
issn = "1935-7893",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refining surge capacity

T2 - Conventional, contingency, and crisis capacity

AU - Hick, John L.

AU - Barbera, Joseph A.

AU - Kelen, Gabor D

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Health care facility surge capacity has received significant planning attention recently, but there is no commonly accepted framework for detailed, phased surge capacity categorization and implementation. This article proposes a taxonomy within surge capacity of conventional capacity (implemented in major mass casualty incidents and representing care as usually provided at the institution), contingency capacity (using adaptations to medical care spaces, staffing constraints, and supply shortages without significant impact on delivered medical care), and crisis capacity (implemented in catastrophic situations with a significant impact on standard of care). Suggested measurements used to gauge a quantifiable component of surge capacity and adaptive strategies for staff and supply challenges are proposed. The use of refined definitions of surge capacity as it relates to space, staffing, and supply concerns during a mass casualty incident may aid phased implementation of surge capacity plans at health care facilities and enhance the consistency of terminology and data collection between facilities and regions. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S59-S67)

AB - Health care facility surge capacity has received significant planning attention recently, but there is no commonly accepted framework for detailed, phased surge capacity categorization and implementation. This article proposes a taxonomy within surge capacity of conventional capacity (implemented in major mass casualty incidents and representing care as usually provided at the institution), contingency capacity (using adaptations to medical care spaces, staffing constraints, and supply shortages without significant impact on delivered medical care), and crisis capacity (implemented in catastrophic situations with a significant impact on standard of care). Suggested measurements used to gauge a quantifiable component of surge capacity and adaptive strategies for staff and supply challenges are proposed. The use of refined definitions of surge capacity as it relates to space, staffing, and supply concerns during a mass casualty incident may aid phased implementation of surge capacity plans at health care facilities and enhance the consistency of terminology and data collection between facilities and regions. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3(Suppl 1):S59-S67)

KW - Disaster

KW - Emergency management

KW - Emergency preparedness

KW - Hospital preparedness

KW - Surge capacity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67949115745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67949115745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f1ae2

DO - 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f1ae2

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

JF - Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness

SN - 1935-7893

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -