Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task: Discourse stages and referential complexity matter

Marion Fossard, Amélie M. Achim, Lucie Rousier-Vercruyssen, Sylvia Gonzalez, Alexandre Bureau, Maud Champagne-Lavau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

During a narrative discourse, accessibility of the referents is rarely fixed once and for all. Rather, each referent varies in accessibility as the discourse unfolds, depending on the presence and prominence of the other referents. This leads the speaker to use various referential expressions to refer to the main protagonists of the story at different moments in the narrative. This study relies on a new, collaborative storytelling in sequence task designed to assess how speakers adjust their referential choices when they refer to different characters at specific discourse stages corresponding to the introduction, maintaining, or shift of the character in focus, in increasingly complex referential contexts. Referential complexity of the stories was manipulated through variations in the number of characters (1 vs. 2) and, for stories in which there were two characters, in their ambiguity in gender (different vs. same gender). Data were coded for the type of reference markers as well as the type of reference content (i.e., the extent of the information provided in the referential expression). Results showed that, beyond the expected effects of discourse stages on reference markers (more indefinite markers at the introduction stage, more pronouns at the maintaining stage, and more definite markers at the shift stage), the number of characters and their ambiguity in gender also modulated speakers' referential choices at specific discourse stages, For the maintaining stage, an effect of the number of characters was observed for the use of pronouns and of definite markers, with more pronouns when there was a single character, sometimes replaced by definite expressions when two characters were present in the story. For the shift stage, an effect of gender ambiguity was specifically noted for the reference content with more specific information provided in the referential expression when there was referential ambiguity. Reference content is an aspect of referential marking that is rarely addressed in a narrative context, yet it revealed a quite flexible referential behavior by the speakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number176
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberFEB
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 20 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accessibility
  • Collaboration
  • Discourse
  • Interaction
  • Referential choices
  • Referential complexity
  • Storytelling
  • Visual salience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task : Discourse stages and referential complexity matter. / Fossard, Marion; Achim, Amélie M.; Rousier-Vercruyssen, Lucie; Gonzalez, Sylvia; Bureau, Alexandre; Champagne-Lavau, Maud.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, No. FEB, 176, 20.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fossard, Marion ; Achim, Amélie M. ; Rousier-Vercruyssen, Lucie ; Gonzalez, Sylvia ; Bureau, Alexandre ; Champagne-Lavau, Maud. / Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task : Discourse stages and referential complexity matter. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. FEB.
@article{d3436a590894450f88718dfc914e7ab2,
title = "Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task: Discourse stages and referential complexity matter",
abstract = "During a narrative discourse, accessibility of the referents is rarely fixed once and for all. Rather, each referent varies in accessibility as the discourse unfolds, depending on the presence and prominence of the other referents. This leads the speaker to use various referential expressions to refer to the main protagonists of the story at different moments in the narrative. This study relies on a new, collaborative storytelling in sequence task designed to assess how speakers adjust their referential choices when they refer to different characters at specific discourse stages corresponding to the introduction, maintaining, or shift of the character in focus, in increasingly complex referential contexts. Referential complexity of the stories was manipulated through variations in the number of characters (1 vs. 2) and, for stories in which there were two characters, in their ambiguity in gender (different vs. same gender). Data were coded for the type of reference markers as well as the type of reference content (i.e., the extent of the information provided in the referential expression). Results showed that, beyond the expected effects of discourse stages on reference markers (more indefinite markers at the introduction stage, more pronouns at the maintaining stage, and more definite markers at the shift stage), the number of characters and their ambiguity in gender also modulated speakers' referential choices at specific discourse stages, For the maintaining stage, an effect of the number of characters was observed for the use of pronouns and of definite markers, with more pronouns when there was a single character, sometimes replaced by definite expressions when two characters were present in the story. For the shift stage, an effect of gender ambiguity was specifically noted for the reference content with more specific information provided in the referential expression when there was referential ambiguity. Reference content is an aspect of referential marking that is rarely addressed in a narrative context, yet it revealed a quite flexible referential behavior by the speakers.",
keywords = "Accessibility, Collaboration, Discourse, Interaction, Referential choices, Referential complexity, Storytelling, Visual salience",
author = "Marion Fossard and Achim, {Am{\'e}lie M.} and Lucie Rousier-Vercruyssen and Sylvia Gonzalez and Alexandre Bureau and Maud Champagne-Lavau",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "FEB",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Referential choices in a collaborative storytelling task

T2 - Discourse stages and referential complexity matter

AU - Fossard, Marion

AU - Achim, Amélie M.

AU - Rousier-Vercruyssen, Lucie

AU - Gonzalez, Sylvia

AU - Bureau, Alexandre

AU - Champagne-Lavau, Maud

PY - 2018/2/20

Y1 - 2018/2/20

N2 - During a narrative discourse, accessibility of the referents is rarely fixed once and for all. Rather, each referent varies in accessibility as the discourse unfolds, depending on the presence and prominence of the other referents. This leads the speaker to use various referential expressions to refer to the main protagonists of the story at different moments in the narrative. This study relies on a new, collaborative storytelling in sequence task designed to assess how speakers adjust their referential choices when they refer to different characters at specific discourse stages corresponding to the introduction, maintaining, or shift of the character in focus, in increasingly complex referential contexts. Referential complexity of the stories was manipulated through variations in the number of characters (1 vs. 2) and, for stories in which there were two characters, in their ambiguity in gender (different vs. same gender). Data were coded for the type of reference markers as well as the type of reference content (i.e., the extent of the information provided in the referential expression). Results showed that, beyond the expected effects of discourse stages on reference markers (more indefinite markers at the introduction stage, more pronouns at the maintaining stage, and more definite markers at the shift stage), the number of characters and their ambiguity in gender also modulated speakers' referential choices at specific discourse stages, For the maintaining stage, an effect of the number of characters was observed for the use of pronouns and of definite markers, with more pronouns when there was a single character, sometimes replaced by definite expressions when two characters were present in the story. For the shift stage, an effect of gender ambiguity was specifically noted for the reference content with more specific information provided in the referential expression when there was referential ambiguity. Reference content is an aspect of referential marking that is rarely addressed in a narrative context, yet it revealed a quite flexible referential behavior by the speakers.

AB - During a narrative discourse, accessibility of the referents is rarely fixed once and for all. Rather, each referent varies in accessibility as the discourse unfolds, depending on the presence and prominence of the other referents. This leads the speaker to use various referential expressions to refer to the main protagonists of the story at different moments in the narrative. This study relies on a new, collaborative storytelling in sequence task designed to assess how speakers adjust their referential choices when they refer to different characters at specific discourse stages corresponding to the introduction, maintaining, or shift of the character in focus, in increasingly complex referential contexts. Referential complexity of the stories was manipulated through variations in the number of characters (1 vs. 2) and, for stories in which there were two characters, in their ambiguity in gender (different vs. same gender). Data were coded for the type of reference markers as well as the type of reference content (i.e., the extent of the information provided in the referential expression). Results showed that, beyond the expected effects of discourse stages on reference markers (more indefinite markers at the introduction stage, more pronouns at the maintaining stage, and more definite markers at the shift stage), the number of characters and their ambiguity in gender also modulated speakers' referential choices at specific discourse stages, For the maintaining stage, an effect of the number of characters was observed for the use of pronouns and of definite markers, with more pronouns when there was a single character, sometimes replaced by definite expressions when two characters were present in the story. For the shift stage, an effect of gender ambiguity was specifically noted for the reference content with more specific information provided in the referential expression when there was referential ambiguity. Reference content is an aspect of referential marking that is rarely addressed in a narrative context, yet it revealed a quite flexible referential behavior by the speakers.

KW - Accessibility

KW - Collaboration

KW - Discourse

KW - Interaction

KW - Referential choices

KW - Referential complexity

KW - Storytelling

KW - Visual salience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042235622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042235622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00176

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00176

M3 - Article

C2 - 29515493

AN - SCOPUS:85042235622

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

IS - FEB

M1 - 176

ER -