Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry

Barry R. Meisenberg, Robert R. Wright, Catherine J. Brady-Copertino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the number and type of errors associated with chemotherapy order composition associated with three sequential methods of ordering: handwritten orders, preprinted orders, and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) embedded in the electronic health record. Materials and Methods: From 2008 to 2012, a sample of completed chemotherapy orders were reviewed by a pharmacist for the number and type of errors as part of routine performance improvement monitoring. Error frequencies for each of the three distinct methods of composing chemotherapy orders were compared using statistical methods. Results: The rate of problematic order sets - those requiring significant rework for clarification - was reduced from 30.6% with handwritten orders to 12.6% with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 2.2% with CPOE (preprinted v CPOE, P <.001). The incidence of errors capable of causing harm was reduced from 4.2% with handwritten orders to 1.5% with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 0.1% with CPOE (CPOE v preprinted, P <.001). Conclusion: The number of problem- and error-containing chemotherapy orders was reduced sequentially by preprinted order sets and then by CPOE. CPOE is associated with low error rates, but it did not eliminate all errors, and the technology can introduce novel types of errors not seen with traditional handwritten or preprinted orders. Vigilance even with CPOE is still required to avoid patient harm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Oncology Practice
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Order Entry Systems
Drug Therapy
Patient Harm
Electronic Health Records
Pharmacists
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry. / Meisenberg, Barry R.; Wright, Robert R.; Brady-Copertino, Catherine J.

In: Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meisenberg, Barry R. ; Wright, Robert R. ; Brady-Copertino, Catherine J. / Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry. In: Journal of Oncology Practice. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 1.
@article{255c54a6324847a5ae9ea64fa14be0e6,
title = "Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry",
abstract = "Purpose: To measure the number and type of errors associated with chemotherapy order composition associated with three sequential methods of ordering: handwritten orders, preprinted orders, and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) embedded in the electronic health record. Materials and Methods: From 2008 to 2012, a sample of completed chemotherapy orders were reviewed by a pharmacist for the number and type of errors as part of routine performance improvement monitoring. Error frequencies for each of the three distinct methods of composing chemotherapy orders were compared using statistical methods. Results: The rate of problematic order sets - those requiring significant rework for clarification - was reduced from 30.6{\%} with handwritten orders to 12.6{\%} with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 2.2{\%} with CPOE (preprinted v CPOE, P <.001). The incidence of errors capable of causing harm was reduced from 4.2{\%} with handwritten orders to 1.5{\%} with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 0.1{\%} with CPOE (CPOE v preprinted, P <.001). Conclusion: The number of problem- and error-containing chemotherapy orders was reduced sequentially by preprinted order sets and then by CPOE. CPOE is associated with low error rates, but it did not eliminate all errors, and the technology can introduce novel types of errors not seen with traditional handwritten or preprinted orders. Vigilance even with CPOE is still required to avoid patient harm.",
author = "Meisenberg, {Barry R.} and Wright, {Robert R.} and Brady-Copertino, {Catherine J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1200/JOP.2013.000903",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "Journal of Oncology Practice",
issn = "1554-7477",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry

AU - Meisenberg, Barry R.

AU - Wright, Robert R.

AU - Brady-Copertino, Catherine J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: To measure the number and type of errors associated with chemotherapy order composition associated with three sequential methods of ordering: handwritten orders, preprinted orders, and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) embedded in the electronic health record. Materials and Methods: From 2008 to 2012, a sample of completed chemotherapy orders were reviewed by a pharmacist for the number and type of errors as part of routine performance improvement monitoring. Error frequencies for each of the three distinct methods of composing chemotherapy orders were compared using statistical methods. Results: The rate of problematic order sets - those requiring significant rework for clarification - was reduced from 30.6% with handwritten orders to 12.6% with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 2.2% with CPOE (preprinted v CPOE, P <.001). The incidence of errors capable of causing harm was reduced from 4.2% with handwritten orders to 1.5% with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 0.1% with CPOE (CPOE v preprinted, P <.001). Conclusion: The number of problem- and error-containing chemotherapy orders was reduced sequentially by preprinted order sets and then by CPOE. CPOE is associated with low error rates, but it did not eliminate all errors, and the technology can introduce novel types of errors not seen with traditional handwritten or preprinted orders. Vigilance even with CPOE is still required to avoid patient harm.

AB - Purpose: To measure the number and type of errors associated with chemotherapy order composition associated with three sequential methods of ordering: handwritten orders, preprinted orders, and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) embedded in the electronic health record. Materials and Methods: From 2008 to 2012, a sample of completed chemotherapy orders were reviewed by a pharmacist for the number and type of errors as part of routine performance improvement monitoring. Error frequencies for each of the three distinct methods of composing chemotherapy orders were compared using statistical methods. Results: The rate of problematic order sets - those requiring significant rework for clarification - was reduced from 30.6% with handwritten orders to 12.6% with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 2.2% with CPOE (preprinted v CPOE, P <.001). The incidence of errors capable of causing harm was reduced from 4.2% with handwritten orders to 1.5% with preprinted orders (preprinted v handwritten, P <.001) to 0.1% with CPOE (CPOE v preprinted, P <.001). Conclusion: The number of problem- and error-containing chemotherapy orders was reduced sequentially by preprinted order sets and then by CPOE. CPOE is associated with low error rates, but it did not eliminate all errors, and the technology can introduce novel types of errors not seen with traditional handwritten or preprinted orders. Vigilance even with CPOE is still required to avoid patient harm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899948265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899948265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2013.000903

DO - 10.1200/JOP.2013.000903

M3 - Article

C2 - 24003174

AN - SCOPUS:84899948265

VL - 10

JO - Journal of Oncology Practice

JF - Journal of Oncology Practice

SN - 1554-7477

IS - 1

ER -