TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing meat consumption in the USA
T2 - A nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours
AU - Neff, Roni A.
AU - Edwards, Danielle
AU - Palmer, Anne
AU - Ramsing, Rebecca
AU - Righter, Allison
AU - Wolfson, Julia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Objective Excess meat consumption, particularly of red and processed meats, is associated with nutritional and environmental health harms. While only a small portion of the population is vegetarian, surveys suggest many Americans may be reducing their meat consumption. To inform education campaigns, more information is needed about attitudes, perceptions, behaviours and foods eaten in meatless meals. Design A web-based survey administered in April 2015 assessed meat reduction behaviours, attitudes, what respondents ate in meatless meals and sociodemographic characteristics. Setting Nationally representative, web-based survey in the USA. Subjects US adults (n 1112) selected from GfK Knowledgeworks' 50 000-member online panel. Survey weights were used to assure representativeness. Results Two-thirds reported reducing meat consumption in at least one category over three years, with reductions of red and processed meat most frequent. The most common reasons for reduction were cost and health; environment and animal welfare lagged. Non-meat reducers commonly agreed with statements suggesting that meat was healthy and 'belonged' in the diet. Vegetables were most often consumed 'always' in meatless meals, but cheese/dairy was also common. Reported meat reduction was most common among those aged 45-59 years and among those with lower incomes. Conclusions The public and environmental health benefits of reducing meat consumption create a need for campaigns to raise awareness and contribute to motivation for change. These findings provide rich information to guide intervention development, both for the USA and other high-income countries that consume meat in high quantities.
AB - Objective Excess meat consumption, particularly of red and processed meats, is associated with nutritional and environmental health harms. While only a small portion of the population is vegetarian, surveys suggest many Americans may be reducing their meat consumption. To inform education campaigns, more information is needed about attitudes, perceptions, behaviours and foods eaten in meatless meals. Design A web-based survey administered in April 2015 assessed meat reduction behaviours, attitudes, what respondents ate in meatless meals and sociodemographic characteristics. Setting Nationally representative, web-based survey in the USA. Subjects US adults (n 1112) selected from GfK Knowledgeworks' 50 000-member online panel. Survey weights were used to assure representativeness. Results Two-thirds reported reducing meat consumption in at least one category over three years, with reductions of red and processed meat most frequent. The most common reasons for reduction were cost and health; environment and animal welfare lagged. Non-meat reducers commonly agreed with statements suggesting that meat was healthy and 'belonged' in the diet. Vegetables were most often consumed 'always' in meatless meals, but cheese/dairy was also common. Reported meat reduction was most common among those aged 45-59 years and among those with lower incomes. Conclusions The public and environmental health benefits of reducing meat consumption create a need for campaigns to raise awareness and contribute to motivation for change. These findings provide rich information to guide intervention development, both for the USA and other high-income countries that consume meat in high quantities.
KW - Dietary attitudes
KW - Dietary behaviours
KW - Meat consumption
KW - Meat reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044371402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044371402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1368980017004190
DO - 10.1017/S1368980017004190
M3 - Article
C2 - 29576031
AN - SCOPUS:85044371402
SN - 1368-9800
VL - 21
SP - 1835
EP - 1844
JO - Public health nutrition
JF - Public health nutrition
IS - 10
ER -