Red blood cell transfusion: A Clinical practice guideline from the AABB

Jeffrey L. Carson, Brenda J. Grossman, Steven Kleinman, Alan T. Tinmouth, Marisa B. Marques, Mark K. Fung, John B. Holcomb, Orieji Illoh, Lewis J. Kaplan, Louis M. Katz, Sunil V. Rao, John D. Roback, Aryeh Shander, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Robert Weinstein, Lisa Grace Swinton McLaughlin, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

747 Scopus citations

Abstract

Description: Although approximately 85 million units of red blood cells (RBCs) are transfused annually worldwide, transfusion practices vary widely. The AABB (formerly, the American Association of Blood Banks) developed this guideline to provide clinical recommendations about hemoglobin concentration thresholds and other clinical variables that trigger RBC transfusions in hemodynamically stable adults and children. Methods: These guidelines are based on a systematic review of randomized clinical trials evaluating transfusion thresholds. We performed a literature search from 1950 to February 2011 with no language restrictions. We examined the proportion of patients who received any RBC transfusion and the number of RBC units transfused to describe the effect of restrictive transfusion strategies on RBC use. To determine the clinical consequences of restrictive transfusion strategies, we examined overall mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac events, pulmonary edema, stroke, thromboembolism, renal failure, infection, hemorrhage, mental confusion, functional recovery, and length of hospital stay. Recommendation 1: The AABB recommends adhering to a restrictive transfusion strategy (7 to 8 g/dL) in hospitalized, stable patients (Grade: strong recommendation; high-quality evidence). Recommendation 2: The AABB suggests adhering to a restrictive strategy in hospitalized patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and considering transfusion for patients with symptoms or a hemoglobin level of 8 g/dL or less (Grade: weak recommendation; moderate-quality evidence). Recommendation 3: The AABB cannot recommend for or against a liberal or restrictive transfusion threshold for hospitalized, hemodynamically stable patients with the acute coronary syndrome (Grade: uncertain recommendation; very low-quality evidence). Recommendation 4: The AABB suggests that transfusion decisions be influenced by symptoms as well as hemoglobin concentration (Grade: weak recommendation; low-quality evidence).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-58
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume157
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Red blood cell transfusion: A Clinical practice guideline from the AABB'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this