Recurring emergency general surgery

Characterizing a vulnerable population

Nicole Lunardi, Ambar Mehta, Hiba Ezzeddine, Joseph K. Canner, Mohammad Hamidi, Faisal Jehan, Bellal A. Joseph, Avery B. Nathens, David Thomas Efron, Jose Diaz, Joseph Sakran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND Limited data exist for long-term outcomes after emergency general surgeries (EGSs) in the United States. This study aimed to characterize the incidence of inpatient readmissions and additional operations within 6 months of an EGS procedure. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we identified adults (≥18 years old) undergoing one of seven common EGS procedures (appendectomies, cholecystectomies, small bowel resections, large bowel resections, control of gastrointestinal [GI] ulcers and bleeding, peritoneal adhesiolysis, and exploratory laparotomies) who were discharged alive in the 2010-2015 National Readmissions Database. Outcomes included the rates of all-cause inpatient readmissions and of undergoing a second EGS procedure, both within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risk factors of reoperation, adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospital factors. RESULTS Of 706,678 patients undergoing an EGS procedure 131,291 (18.6%) had an inpatient readmission within 6 months. Among those readmitted, 15,178 (11.6%) underwent a second EGS procedure, occurring at a median of 45 days (interquartile range, 15-95). After adjustment, notable predictors of reoperation included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.10]); private, nonprofit hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.02-1.17]); private, investor-owned hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.00-1.85]); discharge to short-term hospital (aOR, 1.35 [1.04-1.74]); discharge with home health care (aOR, 1.19 [1.13-1.25]); and index procedure of control of GI ulcer and bleeding (aOR, 9.38 [8.75-10.05]), laparotomy (aOR, 7.62 [6.92-8.40]), or large bowel resection (aOR, 6.94 [6.44-7.47]). CONCLUSION One fifth of patients undergoing an EGS procedure had an inpatient readmission within 6 months, where one in nine of those underwent a second EGS procedure. As half of all second EGS procedures occurred within 6 weeks of the index procedure, identifying patients with the highest health care needs (index procedure type and discharge needs) may identify patients at risk for subsequent reoperation in nonemergency settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-470
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume86
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Emergencies
Odds Ratio
Inpatients
Reoperation
Laparotomy
Ulcer
Proprietary Hospitals
Logistic Models
Hemorrhage
Delivery of Health Care
Private Hospitals
Appendectomy
Cholecystectomy
Home Care Services
Observational Studies
Retrospective Studies
Databases
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Emergency general surgery
  • outcomes
  • readmissions
  • recurring operation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Recurring emergency general surgery : Characterizing a vulnerable population. / Lunardi, Nicole; Mehta, Ambar; Ezzeddine, Hiba; Canner, Joseph K.; Hamidi, Mohammad; Jehan, Faisal; Joseph, Bellal A.; Nathens, Avery B.; Efron, David Thomas; Diaz, Jose; Sakran, Joseph.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 86, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 464-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lunardi, N, Mehta, A, Ezzeddine, H, Canner, JK, Hamidi, M, Jehan, F, Joseph, BA, Nathens, AB, Efron, DT, Diaz, J & Sakran, J 2019, 'Recurring emergency general surgery: Characterizing a vulnerable population', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 464-470. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002151
Lunardi, Nicole ; Mehta, Ambar ; Ezzeddine, Hiba ; Canner, Joseph K. ; Hamidi, Mohammad ; Jehan, Faisal ; Joseph, Bellal A. ; Nathens, Avery B. ; Efron, David Thomas ; Diaz, Jose ; Sakran, Joseph. / Recurring emergency general surgery : Characterizing a vulnerable population. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 86, No. 3. pp. 464-470.
@article{bc71215e37064b30befdb599b9731c90,
title = "Recurring emergency general surgery: Characterizing a vulnerable population",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Limited data exist for long-term outcomes after emergency general surgeries (EGSs) in the United States. This study aimed to characterize the incidence of inpatient readmissions and additional operations within 6 months of an EGS procedure. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we identified adults (≥18 years old) undergoing one of seven common EGS procedures (appendectomies, cholecystectomies, small bowel resections, large bowel resections, control of gastrointestinal [GI] ulcers and bleeding, peritoneal adhesiolysis, and exploratory laparotomies) who were discharged alive in the 2010-2015 National Readmissions Database. Outcomes included the rates of all-cause inpatient readmissions and of undergoing a second EGS procedure, both within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risk factors of reoperation, adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospital factors. RESULTS Of 706,678 patients undergoing an EGS procedure 131,291 (18.6{\%}) had an inpatient readmission within 6 months. Among those readmitted, 15,178 (11.6{\%}) underwent a second EGS procedure, occurring at a median of 45 days (interquartile range, 15-95). After adjustment, notable predictors of reoperation included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06 [95{\%} confidence interval, 1.01-1.10]); private, nonprofit hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.02-1.17]); private, investor-owned hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.00-1.85]); discharge to short-term hospital (aOR, 1.35 [1.04-1.74]); discharge with home health care (aOR, 1.19 [1.13-1.25]); and index procedure of control of GI ulcer and bleeding (aOR, 9.38 [8.75-10.05]), laparotomy (aOR, 7.62 [6.92-8.40]), or large bowel resection (aOR, 6.94 [6.44-7.47]). CONCLUSION One fifth of patients undergoing an EGS procedure had an inpatient readmission within 6 months, where one in nine of those underwent a second EGS procedure. As half of all second EGS procedures occurred within 6 weeks of the index procedure, identifying patients with the highest health care needs (index procedure type and discharge needs) may identify patients at risk for subsequent reoperation in nonemergency settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, level III.",
keywords = "Emergency general surgery, outcomes, readmissions, recurring operation",
author = "Nicole Lunardi and Ambar Mehta and Hiba Ezzeddine and Canner, {Joseph K.} and Mohammad Hamidi and Faisal Jehan and Joseph, {Bellal A.} and Nathens, {Avery B.} and Efron, {David Thomas} and Jose Diaz and Joseph Sakran",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000002151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "464--470",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recurring emergency general surgery

T2 - Characterizing a vulnerable population

AU - Lunardi, Nicole

AU - Mehta, Ambar

AU - Ezzeddine, Hiba

AU - Canner, Joseph K.

AU - Hamidi, Mohammad

AU - Jehan, Faisal

AU - Joseph, Bellal A.

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Efron, David Thomas

AU - Diaz, Jose

AU - Sakran, Joseph

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND Limited data exist for long-term outcomes after emergency general surgeries (EGSs) in the United States. This study aimed to characterize the incidence of inpatient readmissions and additional operations within 6 months of an EGS procedure. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we identified adults (≥18 years old) undergoing one of seven common EGS procedures (appendectomies, cholecystectomies, small bowel resections, large bowel resections, control of gastrointestinal [GI] ulcers and bleeding, peritoneal adhesiolysis, and exploratory laparotomies) who were discharged alive in the 2010-2015 National Readmissions Database. Outcomes included the rates of all-cause inpatient readmissions and of undergoing a second EGS procedure, both within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risk factors of reoperation, adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospital factors. RESULTS Of 706,678 patients undergoing an EGS procedure 131,291 (18.6%) had an inpatient readmission within 6 months. Among those readmitted, 15,178 (11.6%) underwent a second EGS procedure, occurring at a median of 45 days (interquartile range, 15-95). After adjustment, notable predictors of reoperation included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.10]); private, nonprofit hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.02-1.17]); private, investor-owned hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.00-1.85]); discharge to short-term hospital (aOR, 1.35 [1.04-1.74]); discharge with home health care (aOR, 1.19 [1.13-1.25]); and index procedure of control of GI ulcer and bleeding (aOR, 9.38 [8.75-10.05]), laparotomy (aOR, 7.62 [6.92-8.40]), or large bowel resection (aOR, 6.94 [6.44-7.47]). CONCLUSION One fifth of patients undergoing an EGS procedure had an inpatient readmission within 6 months, where one in nine of those underwent a second EGS procedure. As half of all second EGS procedures occurred within 6 weeks of the index procedure, identifying patients with the highest health care needs (index procedure type and discharge needs) may identify patients at risk for subsequent reoperation in nonemergency settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, level III.

AB - BACKGROUND Limited data exist for long-term outcomes after emergency general surgeries (EGSs) in the United States. This study aimed to characterize the incidence of inpatient readmissions and additional operations within 6 months of an EGS procedure. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we identified adults (≥18 years old) undergoing one of seven common EGS procedures (appendectomies, cholecystectomies, small bowel resections, large bowel resections, control of gastrointestinal [GI] ulcers and bleeding, peritoneal adhesiolysis, and exploratory laparotomies) who were discharged alive in the 2010-2015 National Readmissions Database. Outcomes included the rates of all-cause inpatient readmissions and of undergoing a second EGS procedure, both within 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risk factors of reoperation, adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospital factors. RESULTS Of 706,678 patients undergoing an EGS procedure 131,291 (18.6%) had an inpatient readmission within 6 months. Among those readmitted, 15,178 (11.6%) underwent a second EGS procedure, occurring at a median of 45 days (interquartile range, 15-95). After adjustment, notable predictors of reoperation included male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.10]); private, nonprofit hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.02-1.17]); private, investor-owned hospitals (aOR, 1.09 [1.00-1.85]); discharge to short-term hospital (aOR, 1.35 [1.04-1.74]); discharge with home health care (aOR, 1.19 [1.13-1.25]); and index procedure of control of GI ulcer and bleeding (aOR, 9.38 [8.75-10.05]), laparotomy (aOR, 7.62 [6.92-8.40]), or large bowel resection (aOR, 6.94 [6.44-7.47]). CONCLUSION One fifth of patients undergoing an EGS procedure had an inpatient readmission within 6 months, where one in nine of those underwent a second EGS procedure. As half of all second EGS procedures occurred within 6 weeks of the index procedure, identifying patients with the highest health care needs (index procedure type and discharge needs) may identify patients at risk for subsequent reoperation in nonemergency settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, level III.

KW - Emergency general surgery

KW - outcomes

KW - readmissions

KW - recurring operation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061973597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061973597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002151

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002151

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 464

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 3

ER -