Recruitment of caregivers into health services research: Lessons from a user-centred design study

Myles Leslie, Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani, Gail Mackean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: With patient and public engagement in many aspects of the healthcare system becoming an imperative, the recruitment of patients and members of the public into service and research roles has emerged as a challenge. The existing literature carries few reports of the methods – successful and unsuccessful – that researchers engaged in user-centred design (UCD) projects are using to recruit participants as equal partners in co-design research. This paper uses the recruitment experiences of a specific UCD project to provide a road map for other investigators, and to make general recommendations for funding agencies interested in supporting co-design research. Methods: We used a case study methodology and employed Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Focus Group discussions to collect data. We recruited 25 family caregivers. Results: Employing various strategies to recruit unpaid family caregivers in a UCD project aimed at co-designing an assistive technology for family caregivers, we found that recruitment through caregiver agencies is the most efficient (least costly) and effective mechanism. The nature of this recruitment work – thetimeandcompromises it requires – has, we believe, implications for funding agencies who need to understand that working with caregivers agencies, requires a considerable amount of time for building relationships, aligning values, and establishing trust. Conclusions: In addition to providing adaptable strategies, the paper contributes to discussions surrounding how projects seeking effective, meaningful, and ethical patient and public engagement are planned and funded. We call for more evidence to explore effective mechanisms to recruit family caregivers into qualitative research. We also call for reports of successful strategies that other researchers have employed to recruit and retain family caregivers in their research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17
JournalResearch Involvement and Engagement
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2019

Fingerprint

Health Services Research
Caregivers
caregiver
health service
Patient Participation
Research Personnel
research planning
Research Design
funding
Self-Help Devices
Qualitative Research
Focus Groups
Research
group discussion
Patient Selection
qualitative research
Delivery of Health Care
methodology
evidence
Values

Keywords

  • Caregivers
  • Elderly
  • Health services research
  • Patient engagement
  • Recruitment
  • User-centred design (UCD)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Recruitment of caregivers into health services research : Lessons from a user-centred design study. / Leslie, Myles; Khayatzadeh-Mahani, Akram; Mackean, Gail.

In: Research Involvement and Engagement, Vol. 5, No. 1, 17, 20.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leslie, Myles ; Khayatzadeh-Mahani, Akram ; Mackean, Gail. / Recruitment of caregivers into health services research : Lessons from a user-centred design study. In: Research Involvement and Engagement. 2019 ; Vol. 5, No. 1.
@article{07283609f95741b39e14484dc20502cd,
title = "Recruitment of caregivers into health services research: Lessons from a user-centred design study",
abstract = "Background: With patient and public engagement in many aspects of the healthcare system becoming an imperative, the recruitment of patients and members of the public into service and research roles has emerged as a challenge. The existing literature carries few reports of the methods – successful and unsuccessful – that researchers engaged in user-centred design (UCD) projects are using to recruit participants as equal partners in co-design research. This paper uses the recruitment experiences of a specific UCD project to provide a road map for other investigators, and to make general recommendations for funding agencies interested in supporting co-design research. Methods: We used a case study methodology and employed Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Focus Group discussions to collect data. We recruited 25 family caregivers. Results: Employing various strategies to recruit unpaid family caregivers in a UCD project aimed at co-designing an assistive technology for family caregivers, we found that recruitment through caregiver agencies is the most efficient (least costly) and effective mechanism. The nature of this recruitment work – thetimeandcompromises it requires – has, we believe, implications for funding agencies who need to understand that working with caregivers agencies, requires a considerable amount of time for building relationships, aligning values, and establishing trust. Conclusions: In addition to providing adaptable strategies, the paper contributes to discussions surrounding how projects seeking effective, meaningful, and ethical patient and public engagement are planned and funded. We call for more evidence to explore effective mechanisms to recruit family caregivers into qualitative research. We also call for reports of successful strategies that other researchers have employed to recruit and retain family caregivers in their research.",
keywords = "Caregivers, Elderly, Health services research, Patient engagement, Recruitment, User-centred design (UCD)",
author = "Myles Leslie and Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani and Gail Mackean",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1186/s40900-019-0150-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Research Involvement and Engagement",
issn = "2056-7529",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recruitment of caregivers into health services research

T2 - Lessons from a user-centred design study

AU - Leslie, Myles

AU - Khayatzadeh-Mahani, Akram

AU - Mackean, Gail

PY - 2019/5/20

Y1 - 2019/5/20

N2 - Background: With patient and public engagement in many aspects of the healthcare system becoming an imperative, the recruitment of patients and members of the public into service and research roles has emerged as a challenge. The existing literature carries few reports of the methods – successful and unsuccessful – that researchers engaged in user-centred design (UCD) projects are using to recruit participants as equal partners in co-design research. This paper uses the recruitment experiences of a specific UCD project to provide a road map for other investigators, and to make general recommendations for funding agencies interested in supporting co-design research. Methods: We used a case study methodology and employed Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Focus Group discussions to collect data. We recruited 25 family caregivers. Results: Employing various strategies to recruit unpaid family caregivers in a UCD project aimed at co-designing an assistive technology for family caregivers, we found that recruitment through caregiver agencies is the most efficient (least costly) and effective mechanism. The nature of this recruitment work – thetimeandcompromises it requires – has, we believe, implications for funding agencies who need to understand that working with caregivers agencies, requires a considerable amount of time for building relationships, aligning values, and establishing trust. Conclusions: In addition to providing adaptable strategies, the paper contributes to discussions surrounding how projects seeking effective, meaningful, and ethical patient and public engagement are planned and funded. We call for more evidence to explore effective mechanisms to recruit family caregivers into qualitative research. We also call for reports of successful strategies that other researchers have employed to recruit and retain family caregivers in their research.

AB - Background: With patient and public engagement in many aspects of the healthcare system becoming an imperative, the recruitment of patients and members of the public into service and research roles has emerged as a challenge. The existing literature carries few reports of the methods – successful and unsuccessful – that researchers engaged in user-centred design (UCD) projects are using to recruit participants as equal partners in co-design research. This paper uses the recruitment experiences of a specific UCD project to provide a road map for other investigators, and to make general recommendations for funding agencies interested in supporting co-design research. Methods: We used a case study methodology and employed Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Focus Group discussions to collect data. We recruited 25 family caregivers. Results: Employing various strategies to recruit unpaid family caregivers in a UCD project aimed at co-designing an assistive technology for family caregivers, we found that recruitment through caregiver agencies is the most efficient (least costly) and effective mechanism. The nature of this recruitment work – thetimeandcompromises it requires – has, we believe, implications for funding agencies who need to understand that working with caregivers agencies, requires a considerable amount of time for building relationships, aligning values, and establishing trust. Conclusions: In addition to providing adaptable strategies, the paper contributes to discussions surrounding how projects seeking effective, meaningful, and ethical patient and public engagement are planned and funded. We call for more evidence to explore effective mechanisms to recruit family caregivers into qualitative research. We also call for reports of successful strategies that other researchers have employed to recruit and retain family caregivers in their research.

KW - Caregivers

KW - Elderly

KW - Health services research

KW - Patient engagement

KW - Recruitment

KW - User-centred design (UCD)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067827485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067827485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40900-019-0150-6

DO - 10.1186/s40900-019-0150-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 31139432

AN - SCOPUS:85067827485

VL - 5

JO - Research Involvement and Engagement

JF - Research Involvement and Engagement

SN - 2056-7529

IS - 1

M1 - 17

ER -