TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconstruction of difference in sequential CT studies using penalized likelihood estimation
AU - Pourmorteza, A.
AU - Dang, H.
AU - Siewerdsen, J. H.
AU - Stayman, J. W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work supported in part by an academic-industry partnership with Elekta (Stockholm, Sweden) and the National Institutes of Health grant R01EB017226. The authors thank Drs Junghoon Lee and John Wong (Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University) for collaboration and valuable conversations.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
PY - 2016/2/19
Y1 - 2016/2/19
N2 - Characterization of anatomical change and other differences is important in sequential computed tomography (CT) imaging, where a high-fidelity patient-specific prior image is typically present, but is not used, in the reconstruction of subsequent anatomical states. Here, we introduce a penalized likelihood (PL) method called reconstruction of difference (RoD) to directly reconstruct a difference image volume using both the current projection data and the (unregistered) prior image integrated into the forward model for the measurement data. The algorithm utilizes an alternating minimization to find both the registration and reconstruction estimates. This formulation allows direct control over the image properties of the difference image, permitting regularization strategies that inhibit noise and structural differences due to inconsistencies between the prior image and the current data. Additionally, if the change is known to be local, RoD allows local acquisition and reconstruction, as opposed to traditional model-based approaches that require a full support field of view (or other modifications). We compared the performance of RoD to a standard PL algorithm, in simulation studies and using test-bench cone-beam CT data. The performances of local and global RoD approaches were similar, with local RoD providing a significant computational speedup. In comparison across a range of data with differing fidelity, the local RoD approach consistently showed lower error (with respect to a truth image) than PL in both noisy data and sparsely sampled projection scenarios. In a study of the prior image registration performance of RoD, a clinically reasonable capture ranges were demonstrated. Lastly, the registration algorithm had a broad capture range and the error for reconstruction of CT data was 35% and 20% less than filtered back-projection for RoD and PL, respectively. The RoD has potential for delivering high-quality difference images in a range of sequential clinical scenarios including image-guided surgeries and treatments where accurate and quantitative assessments of anatomical change is desired.
AB - Characterization of anatomical change and other differences is important in sequential computed tomography (CT) imaging, where a high-fidelity patient-specific prior image is typically present, but is not used, in the reconstruction of subsequent anatomical states. Here, we introduce a penalized likelihood (PL) method called reconstruction of difference (RoD) to directly reconstruct a difference image volume using both the current projection data and the (unregistered) prior image integrated into the forward model for the measurement data. The algorithm utilizes an alternating minimization to find both the registration and reconstruction estimates. This formulation allows direct control over the image properties of the difference image, permitting regularization strategies that inhibit noise and structural differences due to inconsistencies between the prior image and the current data. Additionally, if the change is known to be local, RoD allows local acquisition and reconstruction, as opposed to traditional model-based approaches that require a full support field of view (or other modifications). We compared the performance of RoD to a standard PL algorithm, in simulation studies and using test-bench cone-beam CT data. The performances of local and global RoD approaches were similar, with local RoD providing a significant computational speedup. In comparison across a range of data with differing fidelity, the local RoD approach consistently showed lower error (with respect to a truth image) than PL in both noisy data and sparsely sampled projection scenarios. In a study of the prior image registration performance of RoD, a clinically reasonable capture ranges were demonstrated. Lastly, the registration algorithm had a broad capture range and the error for reconstruction of CT data was 35% and 20% less than filtered back-projection for RoD and PL, respectively. The RoD has potential for delivering high-quality difference images in a range of sequential clinical scenarios including image-guided surgeries and treatments where accurate and quantitative assessments of anatomical change is desired.
KW - computed tomography
KW - cone-beam CT
KW - image-guided radiotherapy
KW - model-based image reconstruction
KW - penalized likelihood estimation
KW - prior image-based reconstruction
KW - statistical image reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959234879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959234879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/1986
DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/1986
M3 - Article
C2 - 26894795
AN - SCOPUS:84959234879
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 61
SP - 1986
EP - 2002
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 5
M1 - 1986
ER -