Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health

Edward H. Ip, Hazhir Rahmandad, David A. Shoham, Ross Hammond, Terry T K Huang, Youfa Wang, Patricia L. Mabry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although systems science has emerged as a set of innovative approaches to study complex phenomena, many topically focused researchers including clinicians and scientists working in public health are somewhat befuddled by this methodology that at times appears to be radically different from analytic methods, such as statistical modeling, to which the researchers are accustomed. There also appears to be conflicts between complex systems approaches and traditional statistical methodologies, both in terms of their underlying strategies and the languages they use. We argue that the conflicts are resolvable, and the sooner the better for the field. In this article, we show how statistical and systems science approaches can be reconciled, and how together they can advance solutions to complex problems. We do this by comparing the methods within a theoretical framework based on the work of population biologist Richard Levins. We present different types of models as representing different tradeoffs among the four desiderata of generality, realism, fit, and precision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Education and Behavior
Volume40
Issue number1 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Public Health
Research Personnel
Language
Population
Conflict (Psychology)
Methodology
Modeling
Language Use
Complex Systems
Analytic Method
Realism
Clinicians
Theoretical Framework
Generality

Keywords

  • agent-based model
  • childhood obesity
  • complex systems
  • computational model
  • Levins framework
  • social network analysis
  • statistical model
  • system dynamics model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Ip, E. H., Rahmandad, H., Shoham, D. A., Hammond, R., Huang, T. T. K., Wang, Y., & Mabry, P. L. (2013). Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health. Health Education and Behavior, 40(1 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113493911

Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health. / Ip, Edward H.; Rahmandad, Hazhir; Shoham, David A.; Hammond, Ross; Huang, Terry T K; Wang, Youfa; Mabry, Patricia L.

In: Health Education and Behavior, Vol. 40, No. 1 SUPPL., 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ip, EH, Rahmandad, H, Shoham, DA, Hammond, R, Huang, TTK, Wang, Y & Mabry, PL 2013, 'Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health', Health Education and Behavior, vol. 40, no. 1 SUPPL.. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113493911
Ip, Edward H. ; Rahmandad, Hazhir ; Shoham, David A. ; Hammond, Ross ; Huang, Terry T K ; Wang, Youfa ; Mabry, Patricia L. / Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health. In: Health Education and Behavior. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 1 SUPPL.
@article{8f64bc719b134ba3a4819bbcb3e5a2e5,
title = "Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health",
abstract = "Although systems science has emerged as a set of innovative approaches to study complex phenomena, many topically focused researchers including clinicians and scientists working in public health are somewhat befuddled by this methodology that at times appears to be radically different from analytic methods, such as statistical modeling, to which the researchers are accustomed. There also appears to be conflicts between complex systems approaches and traditional statistical methodologies, both in terms of their underlying strategies and the languages they use. We argue that the conflicts are resolvable, and the sooner the better for the field. In this article, we show how statistical and systems science approaches can be reconciled, and how together they can advance solutions to complex problems. We do this by comparing the methods within a theoretical framework based on the work of population biologist Richard Levins. We present different types of models as representing different tradeoffs among the four desiderata of generality, realism, fit, and precision.",
keywords = "agent-based model, childhood obesity, complex systems, computational model, Levins framework, social network analysis, statistical model, system dynamics model",
author = "Ip, {Edward H.} and Hazhir Rahmandad and Shoham, {David A.} and Ross Hammond and Huang, {Terry T K} and Youfa Wang and Mabry, {Patricia L.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/1090198113493911",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Health Education and Behavior",
issn = "1090-1981",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciling Statistical and Systems Science Approaches to Public Health

AU - Ip, Edward H.

AU - Rahmandad, Hazhir

AU - Shoham, David A.

AU - Hammond, Ross

AU - Huang, Terry T K

AU - Wang, Youfa

AU - Mabry, Patricia L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Although systems science has emerged as a set of innovative approaches to study complex phenomena, many topically focused researchers including clinicians and scientists working in public health are somewhat befuddled by this methodology that at times appears to be radically different from analytic methods, such as statistical modeling, to which the researchers are accustomed. There also appears to be conflicts between complex systems approaches and traditional statistical methodologies, both in terms of their underlying strategies and the languages they use. We argue that the conflicts are resolvable, and the sooner the better for the field. In this article, we show how statistical and systems science approaches can be reconciled, and how together they can advance solutions to complex problems. We do this by comparing the methods within a theoretical framework based on the work of population biologist Richard Levins. We present different types of models as representing different tradeoffs among the four desiderata of generality, realism, fit, and precision.

AB - Although systems science has emerged as a set of innovative approaches to study complex phenomena, many topically focused researchers including clinicians and scientists working in public health are somewhat befuddled by this methodology that at times appears to be radically different from analytic methods, such as statistical modeling, to which the researchers are accustomed. There also appears to be conflicts between complex systems approaches and traditional statistical methodologies, both in terms of their underlying strategies and the languages they use. We argue that the conflicts are resolvable, and the sooner the better for the field. In this article, we show how statistical and systems science approaches can be reconciled, and how together they can advance solutions to complex problems. We do this by comparing the methods within a theoretical framework based on the work of population biologist Richard Levins. We present different types of models as representing different tradeoffs among the four desiderata of generality, realism, fit, and precision.

KW - agent-based model

KW - childhood obesity

KW - complex systems

KW - computational model

KW - Levins framework

KW - social network analysis

KW - statistical model

KW - system dynamics model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890925298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890925298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1090198113493911

DO - 10.1177/1090198113493911

M3 - Article

C2 - 24084395

AN - SCOPUS:84890925298

VL - 40

JO - Health Education and Behavior

JF - Health Education and Behavior

SN - 1090-1981

IS - 1 SUPPL.

ER -