Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery: An Expert Panel Consensus

Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group, Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE: Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. The 2018 AUA position statement on opioid use suggests using the lowest dose and potency to achieve pain control but the lack of procedure specific prescribing guidelines contributes to wide variation in prescribing patterns. To address this gap we aimed to develop opioid prescribing recommendations through an expert panel consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel included representatives from 5 stakeholder groups. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to develop recommendations for postoperative opioid prescribing. Recommendations were made for opioid naïve patients without chronic pain conditions. The panel used oxycodone 5 mg equivalents to define the number of prescribed tablets. RESULTS: Procedure specific recommendations were developed for 16 endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. The panel agreed that not all patients desire or require opioids and, thus, the minimum recommended number of opioid tablets for all procedures was 0. Consensus ranges were identified to allow prescribed quantities to be aligned with expected needs. The maximum recommended quantity varied by procedure from 0 tablets (3 procedures) to 15 tablets (6 procedures) with a median of 10 tablets. Attending urologists typically voted for higher opioid quantities than nonattending panel members. The panel identified 8 overarching strategies for opioid stewardship, including contextualizing postoperative pain management with patient goals and preferences, and maximizing nonopioid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure specific guidelines for postoperative opioid prescribing may help align individual urologist prescribing habits with consensus recommendations. These guidelines can aid quality improvement efforts to reduce overprescribing in urology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-158
Number of pages8
JournalThe Journal of urology
Volume203
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Opioid Analgesics
Consensus
Tablets
Guidelines
Oxycodone
Patient Preference
Urology
Pain Management
Postoperative Pain
Quality Improvement
Chronic Pain
Habits
Pain

Keywords

  • inappropriate prescribing
  • opioid-related disorders
  • pain
  • postoperative
  • practice guidelines as topic
  • urinary tract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group, & Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group (2020). Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery: An Expert Panel Consensus. The Journal of urology, 203(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000514

Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery : An Expert Panel Consensus. / Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group; Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group.

In: The Journal of urology, Vol. 203, No. 1, 01.01.2020, p. 151-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group & Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group 2020, 'Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery: An Expert Panel Consensus', The Journal of urology, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000514
Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group, Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group. Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery: An Expert Panel Consensus. The Journal of urology. 2020 Jan 1;203(1):151-158. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000514
Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group ; Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group. / Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery : An Expert Panel Consensus. In: The Journal of urology. 2020 ; Vol. 203, No. 1. pp. 151-158.
@article{5d5c76bb31a04f3f876094c9ce2adb7f,
title = "Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery: An Expert Panel Consensus",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. The 2018 AUA position statement on opioid use suggests using the lowest dose and potency to achieve pain control but the lack of procedure specific prescribing guidelines contributes to wide variation in prescribing patterns. To address this gap we aimed to develop opioid prescribing recommendations through an expert panel consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel included representatives from 5 stakeholder groups. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to develop recommendations for postoperative opioid prescribing. Recommendations were made for opioid na{\"i}ve patients without chronic pain conditions. The panel used oxycodone 5 mg equivalents to define the number of prescribed tablets. RESULTS: Procedure specific recommendations were developed for 16 endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. The panel agreed that not all patients desire or require opioids and, thus, the minimum recommended number of opioid tablets for all procedures was 0. Consensus ranges were identified to allow prescribed quantities to be aligned with expected needs. The maximum recommended quantity varied by procedure from 0 tablets (3 procedures) to 15 tablets (6 procedures) with a median of 10 tablets. Attending urologists typically voted for higher opioid quantities than nonattending panel members. The panel identified 8 overarching strategies for opioid stewardship, including contextualizing postoperative pain management with patient goals and preferences, and maximizing nonopioid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure specific guidelines for postoperative opioid prescribing may help align individual urologist prescribing habits with consensus recommendations. These guidelines can aid quality improvement efforts to reduce overprescribing in urology.",
keywords = "inappropriate prescribing, opioid-related disorders, pain, postoperative, practice guidelines as topic, urinary tract",
author = "{Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group} and {Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group} and Kevin Koo and Farzana Faisal and Natasha Gupta and Meyer, {Alexa R.} and Patel, {Hiten D.} and Pierorazio, {Phillip M.} and Matlaga, {Brian R.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JU.0000000000000514",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "151--158",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery

T2 - An Expert Panel Consensus

AU - Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group

AU - Promoting Opioid Stewardship in Endourology Work Group

AU - Koo, Kevin

AU - Faisal, Farzana

AU - Gupta, Natasha

AU - Meyer, Alexa R.

AU - Patel, Hiten D.

AU - Pierorazio, Phillip M.

AU - Matlaga, Brian R.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. The 2018 AUA position statement on opioid use suggests using the lowest dose and potency to achieve pain control but the lack of procedure specific prescribing guidelines contributes to wide variation in prescribing patterns. To address this gap we aimed to develop opioid prescribing recommendations through an expert panel consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel included representatives from 5 stakeholder groups. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to develop recommendations for postoperative opioid prescribing. Recommendations were made for opioid naïve patients without chronic pain conditions. The panel used oxycodone 5 mg equivalents to define the number of prescribed tablets. RESULTS: Procedure specific recommendations were developed for 16 endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. The panel agreed that not all patients desire or require opioids and, thus, the minimum recommended number of opioid tablets for all procedures was 0. Consensus ranges were identified to allow prescribed quantities to be aligned with expected needs. The maximum recommended quantity varied by procedure from 0 tablets (3 procedures) to 15 tablets (6 procedures) with a median of 10 tablets. Attending urologists typically voted for higher opioid quantities than nonattending panel members. The panel identified 8 overarching strategies for opioid stewardship, including contextualizing postoperative pain management with patient goals and preferences, and maximizing nonopioid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure specific guidelines for postoperative opioid prescribing may help align individual urologist prescribing habits with consensus recommendations. These guidelines can aid quality improvement efforts to reduce overprescribing in urology.

AB - PURPOSE: Opioids are frequently overprescribed after surgery. The 2018 AUA position statement on opioid use suggests using the lowest dose and potency to achieve pain control but the lack of procedure specific prescribing guidelines contributes to wide variation in prescribing patterns. To address this gap we aimed to develop opioid prescribing recommendations through an expert panel consensus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel included representatives from 5 stakeholder groups. A 3-step modified Delphi method was used to develop recommendations for postoperative opioid prescribing. Recommendations were made for opioid naïve patients without chronic pain conditions. The panel used oxycodone 5 mg equivalents to define the number of prescribed tablets. RESULTS: Procedure specific recommendations were developed for 16 endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. The panel agreed that not all patients desire or require opioids and, thus, the minimum recommended number of opioid tablets for all procedures was 0. Consensus ranges were identified to allow prescribed quantities to be aligned with expected needs. The maximum recommended quantity varied by procedure from 0 tablets (3 procedures) to 15 tablets (6 procedures) with a median of 10 tablets. Attending urologists typically voted for higher opioid quantities than nonattending panel members. The panel identified 8 overarching strategies for opioid stewardship, including contextualizing postoperative pain management with patient goals and preferences, and maximizing nonopioid therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure specific guidelines for postoperative opioid prescribing may help align individual urologist prescribing habits with consensus recommendations. These guidelines can aid quality improvement efforts to reduce overprescribing in urology.

KW - inappropriate prescribing

KW - opioid-related disorders

KW - pain

KW - postoperative

KW - practice guidelines as topic

KW - urinary tract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076327842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076327842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JU.0000000000000514

DO - 10.1097/JU.0000000000000514

M3 - Article

C2 - 31464563

AN - SCOPUS:85076327842

VL - 203

SP - 151

EP - 158

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -