Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

Christopher R. Kinsinger, James Apffel, Mark Baker, Xiaopeng Bian, Christoph H. Borchers, Ralph Bradshaw, Mi Youn Brusniak, Daniel Wan-Yui Chan, Eric W. Deutsch, Bruno Domon, Jeff Gorman, Rudolf Grimm, William Hancock, Henning Hermjakob, David Horn, Christie Hunter, Patrik Kolar, Hans Joachim Kraus, Hanno Langen, Rune Linding & 16 others Robert L. Moritz, Gilbert S. Omenn, Ron Orlando, Akhilesh Pandey, Peipei Ping, Amir Rahbar, Robert Rivers, Sean L. Seymour, Richard J. Simpson, Douglas Slotta, Richard D. Smith, Stephen E. Stein, David L. Tabb, Danilo Tagle, John R. Yates, Henry Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the United States National Cancer Institute convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: 1) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and 2) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in the Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Proteomics, and Proteomics Clinical Applications as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMolecular and Cellular Proteomics
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Proteomics
Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry
Education
Research
Peer Review
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Data Accuracy
Information Dissemination
Proteome
Software

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles). / Kinsinger, Christopher R.; Apffel, James; Baker, Mark; Bian, Xiaopeng; Borchers, Christoph H.; Bradshaw, Ralph; Brusniak, Mi Youn; Chan, Daniel Wan-Yui; Deutsch, Eric W.; Domon, Bruno; Gorman, Jeff; Grimm, Rudolf; Hancock, William; Hermjakob, Henning; Horn, David; Hunter, Christie; Kolar, Patrik; Kraus, Hans Joachim; Langen, Hanno; Linding, Rune; Moritz, Robert L.; Omenn, Gilbert S.; Orlando, Ron; Pandey, Akhilesh; Ping, Peipei; Rahbar, Amir; Rivers, Robert; Seymour, Sean L.; Simpson, Richard J.; Slotta, Douglas; Smith, Richard D.; Stein, Stephen E.; Tabb, David L.; Tagle, Danilo; Yates, John R.; Rodriguez, Henry.

In: Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Vol. 10, No. 12, 12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kinsinger, CR, Apffel, J, Baker, M, Bian, X, Borchers, CH, Bradshaw, R, Brusniak, MY, Chan, DW-Y, Deutsch, EW, Domon, B, Gorman, J, Grimm, R, Hancock, W, Hermjakob, H, Horn, D, Hunter, C, Kolar, P, Kraus, HJ, Langen, H, Linding, R, Moritz, RL, Omenn, GS, Orlando, R, Pandey, A, Ping, P, Rahbar, A, Rivers, R, Seymour, SL, Simpson, RJ, Slotta, D, Smith, RD, Stein, SE, Tabb, DL, Tagle, D, Yates, JR & Rodriguez, H 2011, 'Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)', Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 10, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O111.015446
Kinsinger, Christopher R. ; Apffel, James ; Baker, Mark ; Bian, Xiaopeng ; Borchers, Christoph H. ; Bradshaw, Ralph ; Brusniak, Mi Youn ; Chan, Daniel Wan-Yui ; Deutsch, Eric W. ; Domon, Bruno ; Gorman, Jeff ; Grimm, Rudolf ; Hancock, William ; Hermjakob, Henning ; Horn, David ; Hunter, Christie ; Kolar, Patrik ; Kraus, Hans Joachim ; Langen, Hanno ; Linding, Rune ; Moritz, Robert L. ; Omenn, Gilbert S. ; Orlando, Ron ; Pandey, Akhilesh ; Ping, Peipei ; Rahbar, Amir ; Rivers, Robert ; Seymour, Sean L. ; Simpson, Richard J. ; Slotta, Douglas ; Smith, Richard D. ; Stein, Stephen E. ; Tabb, David L. ; Tagle, Danilo ; Yates, John R. ; Rodriguez, Henry. / Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles). In: Molecular and Cellular Proteomics. 2011 ; Vol. 10, No. 12.
@article{a0e134f4abb34a7594698243f855181e,
title = "Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)",
abstract = "Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the United States National Cancer Institute convened the {"}International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics{"} in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: 1) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and 2) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in the Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Proteomics, and Proteomics Clinical Applications as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.",
author = "Kinsinger, {Christopher R.} and James Apffel and Mark Baker and Xiaopeng Bian and Borchers, {Christoph H.} and Ralph Bradshaw and Brusniak, {Mi Youn} and Chan, {Daniel Wan-Yui} and Deutsch, {Eric W.} and Bruno Domon and Jeff Gorman and Rudolf Grimm and William Hancock and Henning Hermjakob and David Horn and Christie Hunter and Patrik Kolar and Kraus, {Hans Joachim} and Hanno Langen and Rune Linding and Moritz, {Robert L.} and Omenn, {Gilbert S.} and Ron Orlando and Akhilesh Pandey and Peipei Ping and Amir Rahbar and Robert Rivers and Seymour, {Sean L.} and Simpson, {Richard J.} and Douglas Slotta and Smith, {Richard D.} and Stein, {Stephen E.} and Tabb, {David L.} and Danilo Tagle and Yates, {John R.} and Henry Rodriguez",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1074/mcp.O111.015446",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "Molecular and Cellular Proteomics",
issn = "1535-9476",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)

AU - Kinsinger, Christopher R.

AU - Apffel, James

AU - Baker, Mark

AU - Bian, Xiaopeng

AU - Borchers, Christoph H.

AU - Bradshaw, Ralph

AU - Brusniak, Mi Youn

AU - Chan, Daniel Wan-Yui

AU - Deutsch, Eric W.

AU - Domon, Bruno

AU - Gorman, Jeff

AU - Grimm, Rudolf

AU - Hancock, William

AU - Hermjakob, Henning

AU - Horn, David

AU - Hunter, Christie

AU - Kolar, Patrik

AU - Kraus, Hans Joachim

AU - Langen, Hanno

AU - Linding, Rune

AU - Moritz, Robert L.

AU - Omenn, Gilbert S.

AU - Orlando, Ron

AU - Pandey, Akhilesh

AU - Ping, Peipei

AU - Rahbar, Amir

AU - Rivers, Robert

AU - Seymour, Sean L.

AU - Simpson, Richard J.

AU - Slotta, Douglas

AU - Smith, Richard D.

AU - Stein, Stephen E.

AU - Tabb, David L.

AU - Tagle, Danilo

AU - Yates, John R.

AU - Rodriguez, Henry

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the United States National Cancer Institute convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: 1) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and 2) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in the Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Proteomics, and Proteomics Clinical Applications as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.

AB - Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the United States National Cancer Institute convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed up on two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: 1) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and 2) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in the Journal of Proteome Research, Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, Proteomics, and Proteomics Clinical Applications as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055168460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83055168460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1074/mcp.O111.015446

DO - 10.1074/mcp.O111.015446

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Molecular and Cellular Proteomics

JF - Molecular and Cellular Proteomics

SN - 1535-9476

IS - 12

ER -