Recipients of housing assistance under welfare reform: Trends in employment and welfare participation

Joseph M. Harkness, Sandra J Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Between 1994 and 2001, the employment of low-skilled single mothers increased dramatically and the welfare rolls shrank. Did these gains extend to single mothers who received federal housing assistance? This question is important because these women constitute a large, highly disadvantaged group and because housing assistance may work at cross-purposes to welfare reform by fostering dependency on public support. The prospect of deep cuts in housing programs adds to the timeliness of this research. We find that employment increased as much for single mothers who received housing assistance as for those who did not. Although welfare participation appears to have declined somewhat less for single mothers getting housing assistance, this may be due to inadequate data. Demographic differences do not appear to matter Gains from increased employment more than offset welfare losses, for an estimated annual net savings of approximately $265 million in government outlays for housing subsidies in 2001.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-108
Number of pages28
JournalHousing Policy Debate
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

welfare reform
assistance
recipient
welfare
housing
reform
participation
trend
public support
savings
subsidy

Keywords

  • Families and children
  • Housing assistance programs
  • Welfare

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Recipients of housing assistance under welfare reform : Trends in employment and welfare participation. / Harkness, Joseph M.; Newman, Sandra J.

In: Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2006, p. 81-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{91b4d4b2095d467c8e9b36002e8e4b1c,
title = "Recipients of housing assistance under welfare reform: Trends in employment and welfare participation",
abstract = "Between 1994 and 2001, the employment of low-skilled single mothers increased dramatically and the welfare rolls shrank. Did these gains extend to single mothers who received federal housing assistance? This question is important because these women constitute a large, highly disadvantaged group and because housing assistance may work at cross-purposes to welfare reform by fostering dependency on public support. The prospect of deep cuts in housing programs adds to the timeliness of this research. We find that employment increased as much for single mothers who received housing assistance as for those who did not. Although welfare participation appears to have declined somewhat less for single mothers getting housing assistance, this may be due to inadequate data. Demographic differences do not appear to matter Gains from increased employment more than offset welfare losses, for an estimated annual net savings of approximately $265 million in government outlays for housing subsidies in 2001.",
keywords = "Families and children, Housing assistance programs, Welfare",
author = "Harkness, {Joseph M.} and Newman, {Sandra J}",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "81--108",
journal = "Housing Policy Debate",
issn = "1051-1482",
publisher = "Taylor Graham Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recipients of housing assistance under welfare reform

T2 - Trends in employment and welfare participation

AU - Harkness, Joseph M.

AU - Newman, Sandra J

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Between 1994 and 2001, the employment of low-skilled single mothers increased dramatically and the welfare rolls shrank. Did these gains extend to single mothers who received federal housing assistance? This question is important because these women constitute a large, highly disadvantaged group and because housing assistance may work at cross-purposes to welfare reform by fostering dependency on public support. The prospect of deep cuts in housing programs adds to the timeliness of this research. We find that employment increased as much for single mothers who received housing assistance as for those who did not. Although welfare participation appears to have declined somewhat less for single mothers getting housing assistance, this may be due to inadequate data. Demographic differences do not appear to matter Gains from increased employment more than offset welfare losses, for an estimated annual net savings of approximately $265 million in government outlays for housing subsidies in 2001.

AB - Between 1994 and 2001, the employment of low-skilled single mothers increased dramatically and the welfare rolls shrank. Did these gains extend to single mothers who received federal housing assistance? This question is important because these women constitute a large, highly disadvantaged group and because housing assistance may work at cross-purposes to welfare reform by fostering dependency on public support. The prospect of deep cuts in housing programs adds to the timeliness of this research. We find that employment increased as much for single mothers who received housing assistance as for those who did not. Although welfare participation appears to have declined somewhat less for single mothers getting housing assistance, this may be due to inadequate data. Demographic differences do not appear to matter Gains from increased employment more than offset welfare losses, for an estimated annual net savings of approximately $265 million in government outlays for housing subsidies in 2001.

KW - Families and children

KW - Housing assistance programs

KW - Welfare

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746363529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746363529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33746363529

VL - 17

SP - 81

EP - 108

JO - Housing Policy Debate

JF - Housing Policy Debate

SN - 1051-1482

IS - 1

ER -