Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives

Simon Dunne, Vikram S Chib, Joseph Berleant, John P. O'Doherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has been observed that the performing for high stakes can, paradoxically, lead to uncharacteristically poor performance. Here we investigate a novel approach to attenuating such 'choking under pressure' by instructing participants performing a demanding motor task that rewards successful performance with a monetary gain, to reappraise this incentive as a monetary loss for unsuccessful performance. We show that when participants applied this simple strategy, choking was significantly reduced. This strategy also influenced participants' neural and physiological activity. When participants reappraised the incentive as a potential monetary loss, the representation of the magnitude of the incentive in the ventral striatum Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal was attenuated. In addition, individual differences in the degree of attenuation of the neural response to incentive predicted the effectiveness of the reappraisal strategy in reducing choking. Furthermore, participants' skin conductance changed in proportion to the magnitude of the incentive being played for, and was exaggerated on high incentive trials on which participants failed. Reappraisal of the incentive abolished this exaggerated skin conductance response. This represents the first experimental association of sympathetic arousal with choking. Taken together, these results suggest that reappraisal of the incentive is indeed a promising intervention for attenuating choking under pressure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-22
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 4 2019

Fingerprint

Airway Obstruction
Motivation
Pressure
Skin
Arousal
Reward
Individuality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives. / Dunne, Simon; Chib, Vikram S; Berleant, Joseph; O'Doherty, John P.

In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Vol. 14, No. 1, 04.01.2019, p. 13-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7a1e159acaf748d08de49b22e7242650,
title = "Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives",
abstract = "It has been observed that the performing for high stakes can, paradoxically, lead to uncharacteristically poor performance. Here we investigate a novel approach to attenuating such 'choking under pressure' by instructing participants performing a demanding motor task that rewards successful performance with a monetary gain, to reappraise this incentive as a monetary loss for unsuccessful performance. We show that when participants applied this simple strategy, choking was significantly reduced. This strategy also influenced participants' neural and physiological activity. When participants reappraised the incentive as a potential monetary loss, the representation of the magnitude of the incentive in the ventral striatum Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal was attenuated. In addition, individual differences in the degree of attenuation of the neural response to incentive predicted the effectiveness of the reappraisal strategy in reducing choking. Furthermore, participants' skin conductance changed in proportion to the magnitude of the incentive being played for, and was exaggerated on high incentive trials on which participants failed. Reappraisal of the incentive abolished this exaggerated skin conductance response. This represents the first experimental association of sympathetic arousal with choking. Taken together, these results suggest that reappraisal of the incentive is indeed a promising intervention for attenuating choking under pressure.",
author = "Simon Dunne and Chib, {Vikram S} and Joseph Berleant and O'Doherty, {John P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1093/scan/nsy108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "13--22",
journal = "Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience",
issn = "1749-5024",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives

AU - Dunne, Simon

AU - Chib, Vikram S

AU - Berleant, Joseph

AU - O'Doherty, John P.

PY - 2019/1/4

Y1 - 2019/1/4

N2 - It has been observed that the performing for high stakes can, paradoxically, lead to uncharacteristically poor performance. Here we investigate a novel approach to attenuating such 'choking under pressure' by instructing participants performing a demanding motor task that rewards successful performance with a monetary gain, to reappraise this incentive as a monetary loss for unsuccessful performance. We show that when participants applied this simple strategy, choking was significantly reduced. This strategy also influenced participants' neural and physiological activity. When participants reappraised the incentive as a potential monetary loss, the representation of the magnitude of the incentive in the ventral striatum Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal was attenuated. In addition, individual differences in the degree of attenuation of the neural response to incentive predicted the effectiveness of the reappraisal strategy in reducing choking. Furthermore, participants' skin conductance changed in proportion to the magnitude of the incentive being played for, and was exaggerated on high incentive trials on which participants failed. Reappraisal of the incentive abolished this exaggerated skin conductance response. This represents the first experimental association of sympathetic arousal with choking. Taken together, these results suggest that reappraisal of the incentive is indeed a promising intervention for attenuating choking under pressure.

AB - It has been observed that the performing for high stakes can, paradoxically, lead to uncharacteristically poor performance. Here we investigate a novel approach to attenuating such 'choking under pressure' by instructing participants performing a demanding motor task that rewards successful performance with a monetary gain, to reappraise this incentive as a monetary loss for unsuccessful performance. We show that when participants applied this simple strategy, choking was significantly reduced. This strategy also influenced participants' neural and physiological activity. When participants reappraised the incentive as a potential monetary loss, the representation of the magnitude of the incentive in the ventral striatum Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signal was attenuated. In addition, individual differences in the degree of attenuation of the neural response to incentive predicted the effectiveness of the reappraisal strategy in reducing choking. Furthermore, participants' skin conductance changed in proportion to the magnitude of the incentive being played for, and was exaggerated on high incentive trials on which participants failed. Reappraisal of the incentive abolished this exaggerated skin conductance response. This represents the first experimental association of sympathetic arousal with choking. Taken together, these results suggest that reappraisal of the incentive is indeed a promising intervention for attenuating choking under pressure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059495128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059495128&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scan/nsy108

DO - 10.1093/scan/nsy108

M3 - Article

C2 - 30481355

AN - SCOPUS:85059495128

VL - 14

SP - 13

EP - 22

JO - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

JF - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

SN - 1749-5024

IS - 1

ER -