Reanalysis in the Career of the Analyst

Jon K. Meyer, Nancy L. Debbink

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

An ad hoc poll of analysts in study groups, at meetings, and in conversations, indicated that a number had more than one analysis. (Some, of course, had a personal analysis prior to training, so that the training analysis was a reanalysis.) Those who had reanalyses felt the experience contributed substantially to the quality of their work and lives. Those self-assessments appeared borne out by work that seemed more attuned to the patient, directed toward understanding process, and facilitating of the development and understanding of transference, resistance, and countertransference. That work also seemed less doctrinaire, conveying vitality and life without being wild. The benefits of reanalysis did not seem to correlate with theoretical orientation. It made little difference whether the analyst's work was conceptualized within ego psychological, conflict, self-psychological, intersubjective, or object relations frameworks. It seemed that the theoretical framework of the "reanalysand" and the "reanalyst" did not matter as much as the additional, personal psychoanalytic experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-71
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychoanalysis
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reanalysis in the Career of the Analyst'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this