Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting

Alvaro Luiz Cansancao, Alexandra Condé-Green, Rafael A. Vidigal, Ricardo Rodriguez, Richard A. D'Amico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of gluteal fat augmentation procedures has increased recently and so has the number of complications. Because of the increased risk of morbidity and mortality when fat is injected intramuscularly, not knowing where fat is injected is concerning. We sought to identify the planes in which fat is injected during the procedure. METHODS: We selected 15 consecutive female patients who desired gluteal fat augmentation. All patients had epidural anesthesia and the gluteal region was infiltrated with a vasoconstrictive solution. With the patient in prone position, an ultrasound probe placed on the buttocks was used to identify the fascial layers. While decanted fat was being injected with a blunt cannula, the images were projected wirelessly to a screen, so that the surgeon and assistant could follow the planes in which the cannula was being introduced and the fat injected. RESULTS: The mean volume of harvested fat was 3533 ml and the mean volume of fat injected per gluteal region was 528 ml. The evaluation of the depth and location of the cannula was performed in real time with the ultrasound, accurately and reliably identifying the planes of fat injection. All injections were subcutaneous. The downsides of this technique were the purchase cost of the ultrasound device, increased surgical time, the need for an assistant to follow the cannula and the probe constantly, and the learning curve. CONCLUSION: Real-time ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat grafting is reliable and may avoid injuring the deep vessels, further decreasing the risks of major complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-376
Number of pages5
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume142
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fats
Buttocks
Prone Position
Learning Curve
Epidural Anesthesia
Subcutaneous Injections
Operative Time
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Injections
Mortality
Cannula

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Cansancao, A. L., Condé-Green, A., Vidigal, R. A., Rodriguez, R., & D'Amico, R. A. (2018). Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 142(2), 372-376. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004602

Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting. / Cansancao, Alvaro Luiz; Condé-Green, Alexandra; Vidigal, Rafael A.; Rodriguez, Ricardo; D'Amico, Richard A.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 142, No. 2, 01.08.2018, p. 372-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cansancao, AL, Condé-Green, A, Vidigal, RA, Rodriguez, R & D'Amico, RA 2018, 'Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting', Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 372-376. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004602
Cansancao AL, Condé-Green A, Vidigal RA, Rodriguez R, D'Amico RA. Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2018 Aug 1;142(2):372-376. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004602
Cansancao, Alvaro Luiz ; Condé-Green, Alexandra ; Vidigal, Rafael A. ; Rodriguez, Ricardo ; D'Amico, Richard A. / Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 142, No. 2. pp. 372-376.
@article{aa0f7f4cf2d74d159fdec00d84c82ecf,
title = "Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The number of gluteal fat augmentation procedures has increased recently and so has the number of complications. Because of the increased risk of morbidity and mortality when fat is injected intramuscularly, not knowing where fat is injected is concerning. We sought to identify the planes in which fat is injected during the procedure. METHODS: We selected 15 consecutive female patients who desired gluteal fat augmentation. All patients had epidural anesthesia and the gluteal region was infiltrated with a vasoconstrictive solution. With the patient in prone position, an ultrasound probe placed on the buttocks was used to identify the fascial layers. While decanted fat was being injected with a blunt cannula, the images were projected wirelessly to a screen, so that the surgeon and assistant could follow the planes in which the cannula was being introduced and the fat injected. RESULTS: The mean volume of harvested fat was 3533 ml and the mean volume of fat injected per gluteal region was 528 ml. The evaluation of the depth and location of the cannula was performed in real time with the ultrasound, accurately and reliably identifying the planes of fat injection. All injections were subcutaneous. The downsides of this technique were the purchase cost of the ultrasound device, increased surgical time, the need for an assistant to follow the cannula and the probe constantly, and the learning curve. CONCLUSION: Real-time ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat grafting is reliable and may avoid injuring the deep vessels, further decreasing the risks of major complications.",
author = "Cansancao, {Alvaro Luiz} and Alexandra Cond{\'e}-Green and Vidigal, {Rafael A.} and Ricardo Rodriguez and D'Amico, {Richard A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000004602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "372--376",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real-Time Ultrasound-Assisted Gluteal Fat Grafting

AU - Cansancao, Alvaro Luiz

AU - Condé-Green, Alexandra

AU - Vidigal, Rafael A.

AU - Rodriguez, Ricardo

AU - D'Amico, Richard A.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The number of gluteal fat augmentation procedures has increased recently and so has the number of complications. Because of the increased risk of morbidity and mortality when fat is injected intramuscularly, not knowing where fat is injected is concerning. We sought to identify the planes in which fat is injected during the procedure. METHODS: We selected 15 consecutive female patients who desired gluteal fat augmentation. All patients had epidural anesthesia and the gluteal region was infiltrated with a vasoconstrictive solution. With the patient in prone position, an ultrasound probe placed on the buttocks was used to identify the fascial layers. While decanted fat was being injected with a blunt cannula, the images were projected wirelessly to a screen, so that the surgeon and assistant could follow the planes in which the cannula was being introduced and the fat injected. RESULTS: The mean volume of harvested fat was 3533 ml and the mean volume of fat injected per gluteal region was 528 ml. The evaluation of the depth and location of the cannula was performed in real time with the ultrasound, accurately and reliably identifying the planes of fat injection. All injections were subcutaneous. The downsides of this technique were the purchase cost of the ultrasound device, increased surgical time, the need for an assistant to follow the cannula and the probe constantly, and the learning curve. CONCLUSION: Real-time ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat grafting is reliable and may avoid injuring the deep vessels, further decreasing the risks of major complications.

AB - BACKGROUND: The number of gluteal fat augmentation procedures has increased recently and so has the number of complications. Because of the increased risk of morbidity and mortality when fat is injected intramuscularly, not knowing where fat is injected is concerning. We sought to identify the planes in which fat is injected during the procedure. METHODS: We selected 15 consecutive female patients who desired gluteal fat augmentation. All patients had epidural anesthesia and the gluteal region was infiltrated with a vasoconstrictive solution. With the patient in prone position, an ultrasound probe placed on the buttocks was used to identify the fascial layers. While decanted fat was being injected with a blunt cannula, the images were projected wirelessly to a screen, so that the surgeon and assistant could follow the planes in which the cannula was being introduced and the fat injected. RESULTS: The mean volume of harvested fat was 3533 ml and the mean volume of fat injected per gluteal region was 528 ml. The evaluation of the depth and location of the cannula was performed in real time with the ultrasound, accurately and reliably identifying the planes of fat injection. All injections were subcutaneous. The downsides of this technique were the purchase cost of the ultrasound device, increased surgical time, the need for an assistant to follow the cannula and the probe constantly, and the learning curve. CONCLUSION: Real-time ultrasound-assisted gluteal fat grafting is reliable and may avoid injuring the deep vessels, further decreasing the risks of major complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059500370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059500370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004602

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004602

M3 - Article

C2 - 29787513

AN - SCOPUS:85059500370

VL - 142

SP - 372

EP - 376

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 2

ER -