Real-Time Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Adults: Implementation and Proof of Concept

Ugochukwu Ugwuowo, Yu Yamamoto, Tanima Arora, Ishan Saran, Caitlin Partridge, Aditya Biswas, Melissa Martin, Dennis G. Moledina, Jason H. Greenberg, Michael Simonov, Sherry G. Mansour, Ricardo Vela, Jeffrey M. Testani, Veena Rao, Keith Rentfro, Wassim Obeid, Chirag R. Parikh, F. Perry Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is diagnosed based on changes in serum creatinine concentration, a late marker of this syndrome. Algorithms that predict elevated risk for AKI are of great interest, but no studies have incorporated such an algorithm into the electronic health record to assist with clinical care. We describe the experience of implementing such an algorithm. Study Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting & Participants: 2,856 hospitalized adults in a single urban tertiary-care hospital with an algorithm-predicted risk for AKI in the next 24 hours >15%. Alerts were also used to target a convenience sample of 100 patients for measurement of 16 urine and 6 blood biomarkers. Exposure: Clinical characteristics at the time of pre-AKI alert. Outcome: AKI within 24 hours of pre-AKI alert (AKI24). Analytical Approach: Descriptive statistics and univariable associations. Results: At enrollment, mean predicted probability of AKI24 was 19.1%; 18.9% of patients went on to develop AKI24. Outcomes were generally poor among this population, with 29% inpatient mortality among those who developed AKI24 and 14% among those who did not (P < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure < 100 mm Hg (28% of patients with AKI24 vs 18% without), heart rate > 100 beats/min (32% of patients with AKI24 vs 24% without), and oxygen saturation < 92% (15% of patients with AKI24 vs 6% without) were all more common among those who developed AKI24. Of all biomarkers measured, only hyaline casts on urine microscopy (72% of patients with AKI24 vs 25% without) and fractional excretion of urea nitrogen (20% [IQR, 12%-36%] among patients with AKI24 vs 34% [IQR, 25%-44%] without) differed between those who did and did not develop AKI24. Limitations: Single-center study, reliance on serum creatinine level for AKI diagnosis, small number of patients undergoing biomarker evaluation. Conclusions: A real-time AKI risk model was successfully integrated into the EHR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)806-814.e1
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume76
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • AKI risk
  • Acute kidney injury (AKI)
  • IL-18
  • KIM-1
  • MCP-1
  • NGAL
  • [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP-7]
  • algorithm implementation
  • biomarker assessment
  • electronic health record (EHR)
  • hospitalized patients
  • inpatient mortality
  • kidney injury marker
  • prediction
  • prognostic model
  • prospective
  • renal function trajectory
  • serum creatinine (Scr)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Real-Time Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Adults: Implementation and Proof of Concept'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this