Reaching substantive female representation among decision-makers: A qualitative research study of gender-related experiences from the health sector in Mozambique

Talata Sawadogo-Lewis, Réka Maulide Cane, Rosemary Morgan, Mary Qiu, Amilcar Magaço, Kátia Ngale, Timothy Roberton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Achieving significant female representation in government at decision-making levels has been identified as a key step towards achieving gender equality. In 2015, women held 39.6% of parliamentary seats in Mozambique, which is above the benchmark of 30% that has been suggested as the turning point for minority representation to move from token status to having a sizable impact. We undertook a study to identify gender-related barriers and facilitators to improving women-centered policies in the health sector. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 39 individuals (32 women, 7 men) involved at a senior level in policy making or implementation of woman-centric policies within the Mozambique Ministry of Health and affiliated institutions. We used a semi-structured interview guide that included questions on difficulties and facilitating factors encountered in the policy making process, and the perceived role of gender in this process. We used both deductive and inductive analysis approaches, starting with a set of pre-identified themes and expanding this to include themes that emerged during coding. Results Our data suggest two main findings: (1) the women who participated in our study generally do not report feeling discrimination in the workplace and (2) senior health sector perceive women to be more personally attuned to women-centric issues than men. Within our specific sample, we found little to suggest that gender discrimination is a problem professionally for female decision-makers in Mozambique. However, these findings should be contextualized using an intersectional lens with recognition of the important difference between descriptive versus substantive female representation, and whether “percentage of women” is truly the best metric for gaging commitment to gender equality at the policy making level. Conclusions Mozambique’s longstanding significant representation of women may have led to creating an environment that leads to positive experiences for female decision-makers in the government. However, while the current level of female representation should be celebrated, it does not negate the need for continued focus on female representation in decision-making positions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0207225
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Mozambique
Qualitative Research
qualitative analysis
Health
gender
Decision making
Gaging
Policy Making
Seats
Lenses
decision making
interviews
Decision Making
Interviews
seats
Benchmarking
health policy
working conditions
Health Policy
Lens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Reaching substantive female representation among decision-makers : A qualitative research study of gender-related experiences from the health sector in Mozambique. / Sawadogo-Lewis, Talata; Cane, Réka Maulide; Morgan, Rosemary; Qiu, Mary; Magaço, Amilcar; Ngale, Kátia; Roberton, Timothy.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 11, e0207225, 01.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64ed8081bbe4476ba61e445abc00637c,
title = "Reaching substantive female representation among decision-makers: A qualitative research study of gender-related experiences from the health sector in Mozambique",
abstract = "Background Achieving significant female representation in government at decision-making levels has been identified as a key step towards achieving gender equality. In 2015, women held 39.6{\%} of parliamentary seats in Mozambique, which is above the benchmark of 30{\%} that has been suggested as the turning point for minority representation to move from token status to having a sizable impact. We undertook a study to identify gender-related barriers and facilitators to improving women-centered policies in the health sector. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 39 individuals (32 women, 7 men) involved at a senior level in policy making or implementation of woman-centric policies within the Mozambique Ministry of Health and affiliated institutions. We used a semi-structured interview guide that included questions on difficulties and facilitating factors encountered in the policy making process, and the perceived role of gender in this process. We used both deductive and inductive analysis approaches, starting with a set of pre-identified themes and expanding this to include themes that emerged during coding. Results Our data suggest two main findings: (1) the women who participated in our study generally do not report feeling discrimination in the workplace and (2) senior health sector perceive women to be more personally attuned to women-centric issues than men. Within our specific sample, we found little to suggest that gender discrimination is a problem professionally for female decision-makers in Mozambique. However, these findings should be contextualized using an intersectional lens with recognition of the important difference between descriptive versus substantive female representation, and whether “percentage of women” is truly the best metric for gaging commitment to gender equality at the policy making level. Conclusions Mozambique’s longstanding significant representation of women may have led to creating an environment that leads to positive experiences for female decision-makers in the government. However, while the current level of female representation should be celebrated, it does not negate the need for continued focus on female representation in decision-making positions.",
author = "Talata Sawadogo-Lewis and Cane, {R{\'e}ka Maulide} and Rosemary Morgan and Mary Qiu and Amilcar Maga{\cc}o and K{\'a}tia Ngale and Timothy Roberton",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0207225",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reaching substantive female representation among decision-makers

T2 - A qualitative research study of gender-related experiences from the health sector in Mozambique

AU - Sawadogo-Lewis, Talata

AU - Cane, Réka Maulide

AU - Morgan, Rosemary

AU - Qiu, Mary

AU - Magaço, Amilcar

AU - Ngale, Kátia

AU - Roberton, Timothy

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Background Achieving significant female representation in government at decision-making levels has been identified as a key step towards achieving gender equality. In 2015, women held 39.6% of parliamentary seats in Mozambique, which is above the benchmark of 30% that has been suggested as the turning point for minority representation to move from token status to having a sizable impact. We undertook a study to identify gender-related barriers and facilitators to improving women-centered policies in the health sector. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 39 individuals (32 women, 7 men) involved at a senior level in policy making or implementation of woman-centric policies within the Mozambique Ministry of Health and affiliated institutions. We used a semi-structured interview guide that included questions on difficulties and facilitating factors encountered in the policy making process, and the perceived role of gender in this process. We used both deductive and inductive analysis approaches, starting with a set of pre-identified themes and expanding this to include themes that emerged during coding. Results Our data suggest two main findings: (1) the women who participated in our study generally do not report feeling discrimination in the workplace and (2) senior health sector perceive women to be more personally attuned to women-centric issues than men. Within our specific sample, we found little to suggest that gender discrimination is a problem professionally for female decision-makers in Mozambique. However, these findings should be contextualized using an intersectional lens with recognition of the important difference between descriptive versus substantive female representation, and whether “percentage of women” is truly the best metric for gaging commitment to gender equality at the policy making level. Conclusions Mozambique’s longstanding significant representation of women may have led to creating an environment that leads to positive experiences for female decision-makers in the government. However, while the current level of female representation should be celebrated, it does not negate the need for continued focus on female representation in decision-making positions.

AB - Background Achieving significant female representation in government at decision-making levels has been identified as a key step towards achieving gender equality. In 2015, women held 39.6% of parliamentary seats in Mozambique, which is above the benchmark of 30% that has been suggested as the turning point for minority representation to move from token status to having a sizable impact. We undertook a study to identify gender-related barriers and facilitators to improving women-centered policies in the health sector. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 39 individuals (32 women, 7 men) involved at a senior level in policy making or implementation of woman-centric policies within the Mozambique Ministry of Health and affiliated institutions. We used a semi-structured interview guide that included questions on difficulties and facilitating factors encountered in the policy making process, and the perceived role of gender in this process. We used both deductive and inductive analysis approaches, starting with a set of pre-identified themes and expanding this to include themes that emerged during coding. Results Our data suggest two main findings: (1) the women who participated in our study generally do not report feeling discrimination in the workplace and (2) senior health sector perceive women to be more personally attuned to women-centric issues than men. Within our specific sample, we found little to suggest that gender discrimination is a problem professionally for female decision-makers in Mozambique. However, these findings should be contextualized using an intersectional lens with recognition of the important difference between descriptive versus substantive female representation, and whether “percentage of women” is truly the best metric for gaging commitment to gender equality at the policy making level. Conclusions Mozambique’s longstanding significant representation of women may have led to creating an environment that leads to positive experiences for female decision-makers in the government. However, while the current level of female representation should be celebrated, it does not negate the need for continued focus on female representation in decision-making positions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056523345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056523345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207225

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0207225

M3 - Article

C2 - 30439988

AN - SCOPUS:85056523345

VL - 13

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e0207225

ER -