Reaching remote health workers in Malawi: Baseline assessment of a pilot mhealth intervention

Nancy Vollmer Lemay, Tara Sullivan, Brian Jumbe, Cary Peabody Perry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

mHealth has great potential to change the landscape of health service delivery in less developed countriesexpanding the reach of health information to frontline health workers in remote areas. Formative, process, and summative evaluation each play an important role in mHealth interventions. K4Health conducted a Health Information Needs Assessment in Malawi from July to September 2009 (formative evaluation) that found widespread use of cell phones among health workers offering new opportunities for knowledge exchange, especially in areas where access to health information is limited. K4Health subsequently designed an 18-month demonstration project (January 2010 to June 2011) to improve the exchange and use of family planning/reproductive health and HIV/AIDS knowledge among health workers, which included the introduction of a short message service (SMS) network. K4Health conducted a pretest of the mHealth intervention from June to October 2010. A baseline assessment was carried out in November 2010 before expanding the SMS network and included use of qualitative and quantitative measures and comparison groups (summative evaluation). Routinely collected statistics also guide the program (process evaluation). This article describes the approach and main findings of the SMS baseline study and contributes to a growing body of evidence measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of mHealth programs using a strong evaluation design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-117
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume17
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2 2012

Fingerprint

Malawi
Telemedicine
SMS
Health
Text Messaging
worker
health information
health
evaluation
Organizational Efficiency
cell phone
Access to Information
Cell Phones
Needs Assessment
family planning
Reproductive Health
Program Evaluation
Family Planning Services
health service
AIDS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Communication

Cite this

Reaching remote health workers in Malawi : Baseline assessment of a pilot mhealth intervention. / Lemay, Nancy Vollmer; Sullivan, Tara; Jumbe, Brian; Perry, Cary Peabody.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 17, No. SUPPL. 1, 02.05.2012, p. 105-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lemay, Nancy Vollmer ; Sullivan, Tara ; Jumbe, Brian ; Perry, Cary Peabody. / Reaching remote health workers in Malawi : Baseline assessment of a pilot mhealth intervention. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2012 ; Vol. 17, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 105-117.
@article{b295dd030abd4aa7af15d8966ef9c644,
title = "Reaching remote health workers in Malawi: Baseline assessment of a pilot mhealth intervention",
abstract = "mHealth has great potential to change the landscape of health service delivery in less developed countriesexpanding the reach of health information to frontline health workers in remote areas. Formative, process, and summative evaluation each play an important role in mHealth interventions. K4Health conducted a Health Information Needs Assessment in Malawi from July to September 2009 (formative evaluation) that found widespread use of cell phones among health workers offering new opportunities for knowledge exchange, especially in areas where access to health information is limited. K4Health subsequently designed an 18-month demonstration project (January 2010 to June 2011) to improve the exchange and use of family planning/reproductive health and HIV/AIDS knowledge among health workers, which included the introduction of a short message service (SMS) network. K4Health conducted a pretest of the mHealth intervention from June to October 2010. A baseline assessment was carried out in November 2010 before expanding the SMS network and included use of qualitative and quantitative measures and comparison groups (summative evaluation). Routinely collected statistics also guide the program (process evaluation). This article describes the approach and main findings of the SMS baseline study and contributes to a growing body of evidence measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of mHealth programs using a strong evaluation design.",
author = "Lemay, {Nancy Vollmer} and Tara Sullivan and Brian Jumbe and Perry, {Cary Peabody}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2011.649106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "105--117",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reaching remote health workers in Malawi

T2 - Baseline assessment of a pilot mhealth intervention

AU - Lemay, Nancy Vollmer

AU - Sullivan, Tara

AU - Jumbe, Brian

AU - Perry, Cary Peabody

PY - 2012/5/2

Y1 - 2012/5/2

N2 - mHealth has great potential to change the landscape of health service delivery in less developed countriesexpanding the reach of health information to frontline health workers in remote areas. Formative, process, and summative evaluation each play an important role in mHealth interventions. K4Health conducted a Health Information Needs Assessment in Malawi from July to September 2009 (formative evaluation) that found widespread use of cell phones among health workers offering new opportunities for knowledge exchange, especially in areas where access to health information is limited. K4Health subsequently designed an 18-month demonstration project (January 2010 to June 2011) to improve the exchange and use of family planning/reproductive health and HIV/AIDS knowledge among health workers, which included the introduction of a short message service (SMS) network. K4Health conducted a pretest of the mHealth intervention from June to October 2010. A baseline assessment was carried out in November 2010 before expanding the SMS network and included use of qualitative and quantitative measures and comparison groups (summative evaluation). Routinely collected statistics also guide the program (process evaluation). This article describes the approach and main findings of the SMS baseline study and contributes to a growing body of evidence measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of mHealth programs using a strong evaluation design.

AB - mHealth has great potential to change the landscape of health service delivery in less developed countriesexpanding the reach of health information to frontline health workers in remote areas. Formative, process, and summative evaluation each play an important role in mHealth interventions. K4Health conducted a Health Information Needs Assessment in Malawi from July to September 2009 (formative evaluation) that found widespread use of cell phones among health workers offering new opportunities for knowledge exchange, especially in areas where access to health information is limited. K4Health subsequently designed an 18-month demonstration project (January 2010 to June 2011) to improve the exchange and use of family planning/reproductive health and HIV/AIDS knowledge among health workers, which included the introduction of a short message service (SMS) network. K4Health conducted a pretest of the mHealth intervention from June to October 2010. A baseline assessment was carried out in November 2010 before expanding the SMS network and included use of qualitative and quantitative measures and comparison groups (summative evaluation). Routinely collected statistics also guide the program (process evaluation). This article describes the approach and main findings of the SMS baseline study and contributes to a growing body of evidence measuring the effectiveness and efficiency of mHealth programs using a strong evaluation design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861328825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861328825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2011.649106

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2011.649106

M3 - Article

C2 - 22548604

AN - SCOPUS:84861328825

VL - 17

SP - 105

EP - 117

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -