Rationale and design of the randomized evaluation of default access to palliative services (REDAPS) trial

Katherine R. Courtright, Vanessa Madden, Nicole B. Gabler, Elizabeth Cooney, Dylan S. Small, Andrea Troxel, David Casarett, Mary Ersek, J. Brian Cassel, Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Gabriel Escobar, Sarah H. Hill, Dan O'Brien, Mark Vogel, Scott D. Halpern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The substantial nationwide investment in inpatient palliative care services stems from their great promise to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce costs. However, robust experimental evidence of these benefits is lacking. The Randomized Evaluation of Default Access to Palliative Services (REDAPS) study is a pragmatic, steppedwedge, cluster randomized trial designed to test the efficacy and costs of specialized palliative care consultative services for hospitalized patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, or end-stage renal disease, as well as the overall effectiveness of ordering such services by default. Additional aims are to identify the types of services that are most beneficial and the types of patients most likely to benefit, including comparisons between ward and intensive care unit patients. We hypothesize that patientcentered outcomes can be improved without increasing costs by simply changing the default option for palliative care consultation from opt-in to opt-out for patients with life-limiting illnesses. Patients aged 65 years or older are enrolled at 11 hospitals using an integrated electronic health record. As a pragmatic trial designed to enroll between 12,000 and 15,000 patients, eligibility is determined using a validated, electronic health record-based algorithm, and all outcomes are captured via the electronic health record and billing systems data. The time at which each hospital transitions from control, opt-in palliative care consultation to intervention, opt-out consultation is randomly assigned. The primary outcome is a composite measure of in-hospital mortality and length of stay. Secondary outcomes include palliative care process measures and clinical and economic outcomes. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02505035).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1629-1639
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Behavioral economics
  • Electronic health records
  • Palliative care
  • Pragmatic clinical trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rationale and design of the randomized evaluation of default access to palliative services (REDAPS) trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this