TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Ruxolitinib for COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome∗
AU - Rein, Lindsay
AU - Calero, Karel
AU - Shah, Ronak
AU - Ojielo, Charles
AU - Hudock, Kristin M.
AU - Lodhi, Saba
AU - Sadaka, Farid
AU - Bellam, Shashi
AU - Palma, Christopher
AU - Hager, David N.
AU - Daniel, Jeannie
AU - Schaub, Richard
AU - O'hayer, Kevin
AU - Theodoropoulos, Nicole M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Rein disclosed that she served as a consultant for AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, and Novartis and as a site principal investigator on clinical trials involving ruxolitinib. Dr. Rein reports receiving research funding including salary support from Incyte Corporation for Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19–Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Require Mechanical Ventilation (RUXCOVID-DEVENT). Dr. Calero reports receiving grants from Incyte Corporation. Dr. Lodhi reports receiving grants and personal fees from Incyte Corporation and Theravance and nonfinancial support from Incyte Corporation. Drs. Daniel, Schaub, and O’Hayer disclosed they are employees of and own stock in Incyte Corporation. Dr. Hager reports receiving a research grant and salary support from Incyte Corporation for the conduct of the RUXCOVID-DEVENT trial, past salary support from the Embedded Precision in Acute Care Trials (EMPACT) Precision Medicine Network for participation in EMPACT Network and from the Marcus Foundation for the conduct of the Vitamin C, Thiamine, and Steroids in Sepsis (VICTAS) trial, and other support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (via subcontract with Vanderbilt University Medical Center). Dr. Theodoropoulos received funding from Incyte Corporation for the RUXCOVID-DEVENT trial. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
Writing assistance was provided by Jane Kovalevich, PhD, an employee of ICON (Blue Bell, PA), and was funded by Incyte Corporation (Wilmington, DE).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Require Mechanical Ventilation (RUXCOVID-DEVENT; NCT04377620). SETTING: Hospitals and community-based private or group practices in the United States (29 sites) and Russia (4 sites). PATIENTS: Eligible patients were greater than or equal to 12 years old, hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and mechanically ventilated with a Pao2/Fio2of less than or equal to 300 mm Hg within 6 hours of randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive twice-daily ruxolitinib 15 mg, ruxolitinib 5 mg, or placebo, each plus standard therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, was tested for each ruxolitinib group versus placebo using a mixed-effects logistic regression model and one-tailed significance test (significance threshold: p < 0.025); no type 1 error was allocated to secondary endpoints. Between May 24, 2020 and December 15, 2020, 211 patients (age range, 24-87 yr) were randomized (ruxolitinib 15/5 mg, n = 77/87; placebo, n = 47). Acute respiratory distress syndrome was categorized as severe in 27% of patients (58/211) at randomization; 90% (190/211) received concomitant steroids. Day-28 mortality was 51% (39/77; 95% CI, 39-62%) for ruxolitinib 15 mg, 53% (45/85; 95% CI, 42-64%) for ruxolitinib 5 mg, and 70% (33/47; 95% CI, 55-83%) for placebo. Neither ruxolitinib 15 mg (odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.201-1.028]; one-sided p = 0.029) nor 5 mg (odds ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.171-1.023]; one-sided p = 0.028) significantly reduced 28-day mortality versus placebo. Numerical improvements with ruxolitinib 15 mg versus placebo were observed in secondary outcomes including ventilator-, ICU-, and vasopressor-free days. Rates of overall and serious treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reduction in 28-day mortality rate between ruxolitinib and placebo in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome was not statistically significant; however, the trial was underpowered owing to early termination.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Ruxolitinib in Participants With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Require Mechanical Ventilation (RUXCOVID-DEVENT; NCT04377620). SETTING: Hospitals and community-based private or group practices in the United States (29 sites) and Russia (4 sites). PATIENTS: Eligible patients were greater than or equal to 12 years old, hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and mechanically ventilated with a Pao2/Fio2of less than or equal to 300 mm Hg within 6 hours of randomization. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive twice-daily ruxolitinib 15 mg, ruxolitinib 5 mg, or placebo, each plus standard therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, was tested for each ruxolitinib group versus placebo using a mixed-effects logistic regression model and one-tailed significance test (significance threshold: p < 0.025); no type 1 error was allocated to secondary endpoints. Between May 24, 2020 and December 15, 2020, 211 patients (age range, 24-87 yr) were randomized (ruxolitinib 15/5 mg, n = 77/87; placebo, n = 47). Acute respiratory distress syndrome was categorized as severe in 27% of patients (58/211) at randomization; 90% (190/211) received concomitant steroids. Day-28 mortality was 51% (39/77; 95% CI, 39-62%) for ruxolitinib 15 mg, 53% (45/85; 95% CI, 42-64%) for ruxolitinib 5 mg, and 70% (33/47; 95% CI, 55-83%) for placebo. Neither ruxolitinib 15 mg (odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.201-1.028]; one-sided p = 0.029) nor 5 mg (odds ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.171-1.023]; one-sided p = 0.028) significantly reduced 28-day mortality versus placebo. Numerical improvements with ruxolitinib 15 mg versus placebo were observed in secondary outcomes including ventilator-, ICU-, and vasopressor-free days. Rates of overall and serious treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reduction in 28-day mortality rate between ruxolitinib and placebo in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome was not statistically significant; however, the trial was underpowered owing to early termination.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Janus kinase inhibitors
KW - randomized controlled trial
KW - respiration, artificial
KW - respiratory distress syndrome
KW - severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142402432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142402432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005682
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005682
M3 - Article
C2 - 36226977
AN - SCOPUS:85142402432
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 50
SP - 1701
EP - 1713
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 12
ER -