Radionuclide shunt patency study for evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus

Siddharth Kharkar, John Shuck, Sumit Kapoor, Sachin Batra, Michael A. Williams, Daniele Rigamonti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Shunt patency studies are performed to determine whether shunt revision surgery is needed in malfunctioned ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The aim of our study was to develop a simple diagnostic algorithm in the diagnostic workup and identify factors associated with improvement after revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with confirmed shunt obstruction who underwent a revision surgery and were followed for 6 to 12 months was performed. A simpler algorithm to identify shunt obstruction was created and compared with the 4-variable algorithm. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients in whom shunt obstruction was suspected, 39 were diagnosed with complete or partial obstruction. Thirty-seven patients underwent shunt revision surgery that included removal of shunt (n = 2), conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt (n = 8), and relocation of the distal end of the catheter into a different part of the peritoneal cavity (n = 27). Improvements were seen in 63.3% (n = 19) of patients evaluated at 6 months and 63.6% (n = 14) of patients evaluated at 12 months. The positive predictive value of the study was 80%. A simpler 1-variable algorithm using T1/2 (half-time) could correctly classify 86.9% of patients with shunt obstruction, compared with a 4-variable algorithm that correctly classified 80% of patients. CONCLUSION: Shunt patency studies are very useful for evaluation of shunt patency. Their results can be interpreted using a single-variable (T1/2) algorithm. Patients most likely to respond to a revision surgery are those who had a good response to original placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-916
Number of pages8
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2009

Fingerprint

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
Radioisotopes
Reoperation
Peritoneal Cavity
Catheters

Keywords

  • Normal pressure hydrocephalus
  • Radionuclide study
  • Shunt malfunction
  • Shunt patency
  • Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Radionuclide shunt patency study for evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus. / Kharkar, Siddharth; Shuck, John; Kapoor, Sumit; Batra, Sachin; Williams, Michael A.; Rigamonti, Daniele.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 64, No. 5, 05.2009, p. 909-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kharkar, Siddharth ; Shuck, John ; Kapoor, Sumit ; Batra, Sachin ; Williams, Michael A. ; Rigamonti, Daniele. / Radionuclide shunt patency study for evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Neurosurgery. 2009 ; Vol. 64, No. 5. pp. 909-916.
@article{c6a23a5a51b44677acfe1296406d9f1c,
title = "Radionuclide shunt patency study for evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Shunt patency studies are performed to determine whether shunt revision surgery is needed in malfunctioned ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The aim of our study was to develop a simple diagnostic algorithm in the diagnostic workup and identify factors associated with improvement after revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with confirmed shunt obstruction who underwent a revision surgery and were followed for 6 to 12 months was performed. A simpler algorithm to identify shunt obstruction was created and compared with the 4-variable algorithm. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients in whom shunt obstruction was suspected, 39 were diagnosed with complete or partial obstruction. Thirty-seven patients underwent shunt revision surgery that included removal of shunt (n = 2), conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt (n = 8), and relocation of the distal end of the catheter into a different part of the peritoneal cavity (n = 27). Improvements were seen in 63.3{\%} (n = 19) of patients evaluated at 6 months and 63.6{\%} (n = 14) of patients evaluated at 12 months. The positive predictive value of the study was 80{\%}. A simpler 1-variable algorithm using T1/2 (half-time) could correctly classify 86.9{\%} of patients with shunt obstruction, compared with a 4-variable algorithm that correctly classified 80{\%} of patients. CONCLUSION: Shunt patency studies are very useful for evaluation of shunt patency. Their results can be interpreted using a single-variable (T1/2) algorithm. Patients most likely to respond to a revision surgery are those who had a good response to original placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.",
keywords = "Normal pressure hydrocephalus, Radionuclide study, Shunt malfunction, Shunt patency, Ventriculoperitoneal shunt",
author = "Siddharth Kharkar and John Shuck and Sumit Kapoor and Sachin Batra and Williams, {Michael A.} and Daniele Rigamonti",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1227/01.NEU.0000343545.93153.EB",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "909--916",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radionuclide shunt patency study for evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus

AU - Kharkar, Siddharth

AU - Shuck, John

AU - Kapoor, Sumit

AU - Batra, Sachin

AU - Williams, Michael A.

AU - Rigamonti, Daniele

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Shunt patency studies are performed to determine whether shunt revision surgery is needed in malfunctioned ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The aim of our study was to develop a simple diagnostic algorithm in the diagnostic workup and identify factors associated with improvement after revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with confirmed shunt obstruction who underwent a revision surgery and were followed for 6 to 12 months was performed. A simpler algorithm to identify shunt obstruction was created and compared with the 4-variable algorithm. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients in whom shunt obstruction was suspected, 39 were diagnosed with complete or partial obstruction. Thirty-seven patients underwent shunt revision surgery that included removal of shunt (n = 2), conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt (n = 8), and relocation of the distal end of the catheter into a different part of the peritoneal cavity (n = 27). Improvements were seen in 63.3% (n = 19) of patients evaluated at 6 months and 63.6% (n = 14) of patients evaluated at 12 months. The positive predictive value of the study was 80%. A simpler 1-variable algorithm using T1/2 (half-time) could correctly classify 86.9% of patients with shunt obstruction, compared with a 4-variable algorithm that correctly classified 80% of patients. CONCLUSION: Shunt patency studies are very useful for evaluation of shunt patency. Their results can be interpreted using a single-variable (T1/2) algorithm. Patients most likely to respond to a revision surgery are those who had a good response to original placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Shunt patency studies are performed to determine whether shunt revision surgery is needed in malfunctioned ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The aim of our study was to develop a simple diagnostic algorithm in the diagnostic workup and identify factors associated with improvement after revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with confirmed shunt obstruction who underwent a revision surgery and were followed for 6 to 12 months was performed. A simpler algorithm to identify shunt obstruction was created and compared with the 4-variable algorithm. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients in whom shunt obstruction was suspected, 39 were diagnosed with complete or partial obstruction. Thirty-seven patients underwent shunt revision surgery that included removal of shunt (n = 2), conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt (n = 8), and relocation of the distal end of the catheter into a different part of the peritoneal cavity (n = 27). Improvements were seen in 63.3% (n = 19) of patients evaluated at 6 months and 63.6% (n = 14) of patients evaluated at 12 months. The positive predictive value of the study was 80%. A simpler 1-variable algorithm using T1/2 (half-time) could correctly classify 86.9% of patients with shunt obstruction, compared with a 4-variable algorithm that correctly classified 80% of patients. CONCLUSION: Shunt patency studies are very useful for evaluation of shunt patency. Their results can be interpreted using a single-variable (T1/2) algorithm. Patients most likely to respond to a revision surgery are those who had a good response to original placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

KW - Normal pressure hydrocephalus

KW - Radionuclide study

KW - Shunt malfunction

KW - Shunt patency

KW - Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650770067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650770067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1227/01.NEU.0000343545.93153.EB

DO - 10.1227/01.NEU.0000343545.93153.EB

M3 - Article

C2 - 19404151

AN - SCOPUS:67650770067

VL - 64

SP - 909

EP - 916

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 5

ER -