Abstract
A growing body of evidence is challenging the indiscriminate use of postoperative radioiodine for remnant ablation (RRA) in low-risk (LR) differentiated thyroid cancer patients. We critically reviewed the current evidence on which the rationale for RRA is based for LR patients and analyzed the new evidence-based recommendations for LR patients from the draft of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. Cost-effective tools for staging and follow-up, such as neck ultrasonography and serial thyroglobulin testing, are useful for monitoring non-RRA-treated patients. Recurrence rates are very low in non-RRA-treated LR patient cohorts. Most RRA side effects are mild and transient, but can impair a patient’s quality of life. RRA is appropriately not routinely recommended in LR patients according to the draft 2015 ATA guidelines and should be reserved for higher-risk patients.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 67-71 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Endocrine |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 25 2015 |
Keywords
- Differentiated thyroid cancer
- Low risk
- Radioiodine remnant ablation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Endocrinology