Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence: Contributions, uses, and limitations

Jacek Mostwin, Andrew Yang, R. Sanders, R. Genadry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Imaging has increased our ability to understand stress incontinence and prolapse and has advanced our existing concepts of pathophysiology. Once these conceptual contributions have been made, imaging modalities may fade from current use, but the lessons learned will remain. It is the relationship of clinical imaging to conceptual development that is important. Conventional radiographic studies are well understood and can be obtained in most facilities. Sonographic units are currently available in many urologic and gynecologic clinics and offices and can be adapted for stress incontinence studies. The benefits of real-time studies and soft-tissue detail at the urethrovesical junction and office-based convenience make this an attractive new technique. The global pelvic approach offered by MR imaging offers spectacular imaging possibilities, which can help in complex cases and in future concepts in the field. MR imaging is rapidly evolving and may continue to offer new insights as technology permits. In accordance with Hodgkinson's earlier observations, imaging should not be routinely required in all patients undergoing evaluation for stress incontinence, but should certainly be considered in failed operations, complex prolapse, and when clinical diagnosis is in doubt. It is always better to use an imaging technique, no matter how expensive, than to end up with a bad surgical result.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-549
Number of pages11
JournalUrologic Clinics of North America
Volume22
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Prolapse
Radiography
Ultrasonography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Aptitude
Time and Motion Studies
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence : Contributions, uses, and limitations. / Mostwin, Jacek; Yang, Andrew; Sanders, R.; Genadry, R.

In: Urologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1995, p. 539-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ffb56aecc4094079a874d248e7a2a573,
title = "Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence: Contributions, uses, and limitations",
abstract = "Imaging has increased our ability to understand stress incontinence and prolapse and has advanced our existing concepts of pathophysiology. Once these conceptual contributions have been made, imaging modalities may fade from current use, but the lessons learned will remain. It is the relationship of clinical imaging to conceptual development that is important. Conventional radiographic studies are well understood and can be obtained in most facilities. Sonographic units are currently available in many urologic and gynecologic clinics and offices and can be adapted for stress incontinence studies. The benefits of real-time studies and soft-tissue detail at the urethrovesical junction and office-based convenience make this an attractive new technique. The global pelvic approach offered by MR imaging offers spectacular imaging possibilities, which can help in complex cases and in future concepts in the field. MR imaging is rapidly evolving and may continue to offer new insights as technology permits. In accordance with Hodgkinson's earlier observations, imaging should not be routinely required in all patients undergoing evaluation for stress incontinence, but should certainly be considered in failed operations, complex prolapse, and when clinical diagnosis is in doubt. It is always better to use an imaging technique, no matter how expensive, than to end up with a bad surgical result.",
author = "Jacek Mostwin and Andrew Yang and R. Sanders and R. Genadry",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "539--549",
journal = "Urologic Clinics of North America",
issn = "0094-0143",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence

T2 - Contributions, uses, and limitations

AU - Mostwin, Jacek

AU - Yang, Andrew

AU - Sanders, R.

AU - Genadry, R.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Imaging has increased our ability to understand stress incontinence and prolapse and has advanced our existing concepts of pathophysiology. Once these conceptual contributions have been made, imaging modalities may fade from current use, but the lessons learned will remain. It is the relationship of clinical imaging to conceptual development that is important. Conventional radiographic studies are well understood and can be obtained in most facilities. Sonographic units are currently available in many urologic and gynecologic clinics and offices and can be adapted for stress incontinence studies. The benefits of real-time studies and soft-tissue detail at the urethrovesical junction and office-based convenience make this an attractive new technique. The global pelvic approach offered by MR imaging offers spectacular imaging possibilities, which can help in complex cases and in future concepts in the field. MR imaging is rapidly evolving and may continue to offer new insights as technology permits. In accordance with Hodgkinson's earlier observations, imaging should not be routinely required in all patients undergoing evaluation for stress incontinence, but should certainly be considered in failed operations, complex prolapse, and when clinical diagnosis is in doubt. It is always better to use an imaging technique, no matter how expensive, than to end up with a bad surgical result.

AB - Imaging has increased our ability to understand stress incontinence and prolapse and has advanced our existing concepts of pathophysiology. Once these conceptual contributions have been made, imaging modalities may fade from current use, but the lessons learned will remain. It is the relationship of clinical imaging to conceptual development that is important. Conventional radiographic studies are well understood and can be obtained in most facilities. Sonographic units are currently available in many urologic and gynecologic clinics and offices and can be adapted for stress incontinence studies. The benefits of real-time studies and soft-tissue detail at the urethrovesical junction and office-based convenience make this an attractive new technique. The global pelvic approach offered by MR imaging offers spectacular imaging possibilities, which can help in complex cases and in future concepts in the field. MR imaging is rapidly evolving and may continue to offer new insights as technology permits. In accordance with Hodgkinson's earlier observations, imaging should not be routinely required in all patients undergoing evaluation for stress incontinence, but should certainly be considered in failed operations, complex prolapse, and when clinical diagnosis is in doubt. It is always better to use an imaging technique, no matter how expensive, than to end up with a bad surgical result.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029091484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029091484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7645155

AN - SCOPUS:0029091484

VL - 22

SP - 539

EP - 549

JO - Urologic Clinics of North America

JF - Urologic Clinics of North America

SN - 0094-0143

IS - 3

ER -