Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment: The role of socioeconomic status

Megan Watson, David Grande, Archana Radhakrishnan, Nandita Mitra, Katelyn R. Ward, Craig Pollack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: This study examines whether socioeconomic status (SES), measured at both the individual and neighborhood levels, is associated with receipt of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer and whether these associations mediate racial differences in treatment between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black men. Design: The Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P2 Access) is a mailed, cross-sectional survey of men sampled from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, combined with neighborhood Census data. Setting: Eight counties in southeastern Pennsylvania. Participants: 2,386 men with prostate adenocarcinoma. Main Measures: Receipt of definitive treatment, race, self-reported income, education, employment status, and neighborhood SES. Results: Overall, Black and White men were equally likely to receive definitive treatment. Men living in neighborhoods with higher SES were more likely to receive definitive treatment (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.01, 2.42). Among men who received definitive treatment, Black men were significantly less likely to receive radical prostatectomy compared with White men (OR .71, 95% CI .52, .98), as were men with some college education compared with those with a high school education or less (OR .66, 95% CI .47, .94). SES does not mediate racial differences in receipt of definitive treatment or the type of definitive treatment received, and associations with income or employment status were not significant. Conclusions: These results stress the importance of examining racial disparities within geographic areas and highlight the unique associations that different measures of SES, particularly neighborhood SES and education, may have with prostate cancer treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-208
Number of pages8
JournalEthnicity and Disease
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Social Class
Prostatic Neoplasms
Education
Therapeutics
Censuses
Prostatectomy
Registries
Prostate
Adenocarcinoma
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Race
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment : The role of socioeconomic status. / Watson, Megan; Grande, David; Radhakrishnan, Archana; Mitra, Nandita; Ward, Katelyn R.; Pollack, Craig.

In: Ethnicity and Disease, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 201-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Watson, Megan ; Grande, David ; Radhakrishnan, Archana ; Mitra, Nandita ; Ward, Katelyn R. ; Pollack, Craig. / Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment : The role of socioeconomic status. In: Ethnicity and Disease. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 201-208.
@article{75bea8a80358476184f7c6b373f13398,
title = "Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment: The role of socioeconomic status",
abstract = "Objective: This study examines whether socioeconomic status (SES), measured at both the individual and neighborhood levels, is associated with receipt of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer and whether these associations mediate racial differences in treatment between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black men. Design: The Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P2 Access) is a mailed, cross-sectional survey of men sampled from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, combined with neighborhood Census data. Setting: Eight counties in southeastern Pennsylvania. Participants: 2,386 men with prostate adenocarcinoma. Main Measures: Receipt of definitive treatment, race, self-reported income, education, employment status, and neighborhood SES. Results: Overall, Black and White men were equally likely to receive definitive treatment. Men living in neighborhoods with higher SES were more likely to receive definitive treatment (OR 1.57, 95{\%}CI 1.01, 2.42). Among men who received definitive treatment, Black men were significantly less likely to receive radical prostatectomy compared with White men (OR .71, 95{\%} CI .52, .98), as were men with some college education compared with those with a high school education or less (OR .66, 95{\%} CI .47, .94). SES does not mediate racial differences in receipt of definitive treatment or the type of definitive treatment received, and associations with income or employment status were not significant. Conclusions: These results stress the importance of examining racial disparities within geographic areas and highlight the unique associations that different measures of SES, particularly neighborhood SES and education, may have with prostate cancer treatment.",
keywords = "Prostate cancer, Race, Socioeconomic status, Treatment",
author = "Megan Watson and David Grande and Archana Radhakrishnan and Nandita Mitra and Ward, {Katelyn R.} and Craig Pollack",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18865/ed.27.3.201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "201--208",
journal = "Ethnicity and Disease",
issn = "1049-510X",
publisher = "ISHIB",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Racial differences in prostate cancer treatment

T2 - The role of socioeconomic status

AU - Watson, Megan

AU - Grande, David

AU - Radhakrishnan, Archana

AU - Mitra, Nandita

AU - Ward, Katelyn R.

AU - Pollack, Craig

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Objective: This study examines whether socioeconomic status (SES), measured at both the individual and neighborhood levels, is associated with receipt of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer and whether these associations mediate racial differences in treatment between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black men. Design: The Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P2 Access) is a mailed, cross-sectional survey of men sampled from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, combined with neighborhood Census data. Setting: Eight counties in southeastern Pennsylvania. Participants: 2,386 men with prostate adenocarcinoma. Main Measures: Receipt of definitive treatment, race, self-reported income, education, employment status, and neighborhood SES. Results: Overall, Black and White men were equally likely to receive definitive treatment. Men living in neighborhoods with higher SES were more likely to receive definitive treatment (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.01, 2.42). Among men who received definitive treatment, Black men were significantly less likely to receive radical prostatectomy compared with White men (OR .71, 95% CI .52, .98), as were men with some college education compared with those with a high school education or less (OR .66, 95% CI .47, .94). SES does not mediate racial differences in receipt of definitive treatment or the type of definitive treatment received, and associations with income or employment status were not significant. Conclusions: These results stress the importance of examining racial disparities within geographic areas and highlight the unique associations that different measures of SES, particularly neighborhood SES and education, may have with prostate cancer treatment.

AB - Objective: This study examines whether socioeconomic status (SES), measured at both the individual and neighborhood levels, is associated with receipt of definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer and whether these associations mediate racial differences in treatment between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black men. Design: The Philadelphia Area Prostate Cancer Access Study (P2 Access) is a mailed, cross-sectional survey of men sampled from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, combined with neighborhood Census data. Setting: Eight counties in southeastern Pennsylvania. Participants: 2,386 men with prostate adenocarcinoma. Main Measures: Receipt of definitive treatment, race, self-reported income, education, employment status, and neighborhood SES. Results: Overall, Black and White men were equally likely to receive definitive treatment. Men living in neighborhoods with higher SES were more likely to receive definitive treatment (OR 1.57, 95%CI 1.01, 2.42). Among men who received definitive treatment, Black men were significantly less likely to receive radical prostatectomy compared with White men (OR .71, 95% CI .52, .98), as were men with some college education compared with those with a high school education or less (OR .66, 95% CI .47, .94). SES does not mediate racial differences in receipt of definitive treatment or the type of definitive treatment received, and associations with income or employment status were not significant. Conclusions: These results stress the importance of examining racial disparities within geographic areas and highlight the unique associations that different measures of SES, particularly neighborhood SES and education, may have with prostate cancer treatment.

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Race

KW - Socioeconomic status

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025452226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025452226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18865/ed.27.3.201

DO - 10.18865/ed.27.3.201

M3 - Article

C2 - 28811730

AN - SCOPUS:85025452226

VL - 27

SP - 201

EP - 208

JO - Ethnicity and Disease

JF - Ethnicity and Disease

SN - 1049-510X

IS - 3

ER -