Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults: Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach

Davida Kornreich, Adele A. Mitchell, Bryn D. Webb, Ingrid Cristian, Ethylin Wang Jabs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of global versus landmark analyses of facial asymmetry using threedimensional photogrammetry to establish a precise method for evaluating facial asymmetry. Design: The landmark-based approach utilized anthropometric data points. Our global approach involved registration of mirror images, independent of a midplane, to calculate a root mean square (RMS) value. We analyzed precision and technical and operator error of both methods. Participants: Three hundred fifty adults participated in this study. Results: We found that the global method has better precision and repeatability with a significantly lower error rate than the landmark-based method. In adults, the average RMS was 0.6253 mm with a standard deviation of 0.16. Conclusions: Our facial asymmetry measurement is more accurate than landmark-based measurements. This method is quick, reliable, and results in generation of a RMS score and a corresponding color-coded facial map that highlights regions of higher and lower asymmetry. This method may be used as a screening tool for asymmetry in both the clinical and research settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-131
Number of pages6
JournalCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Facial Asymmetry
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Photogrammetry
Color
Research

Keywords

  • 3dMD
  • Facial asymmetry
  • Facial landmarks
  • Hemi facial microsomia
  • Oculoauriculovertebral spectrum
  • Root mean square
  • Three-dimensional photogrammetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults : Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach. / Kornreich, Davida; Mitchell, Adele A.; Webb, Bryn D.; Cristian, Ingrid; Jabs, Ethylin Wang.

In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 126-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kornreich, Davida ; Mitchell, Adele A. ; Webb, Bryn D. ; Cristian, Ingrid ; Jabs, Ethylin Wang. / Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults : Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach. In: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 126-131.
@article{8bdc7f596e614ebd972eb813629182cd,
title = "Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults: Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach",
abstract = "Objective: Comparison of global versus landmark analyses of facial asymmetry using threedimensional photogrammetry to establish a precise method for evaluating facial asymmetry. Design: The landmark-based approach utilized anthropometric data points. Our global approach involved registration of mirror images, independent of a midplane, to calculate a root mean square (RMS) value. We analyzed precision and technical and operator error of both methods. Participants: Three hundred fifty adults participated in this study. Results: We found that the global method has better precision and repeatability with a significantly lower error rate than the landmark-based method. In adults, the average RMS was 0.6253 mm with a standard deviation of 0.16. Conclusions: Our facial asymmetry measurement is more accurate than landmark-based measurements. This method is quick, reliable, and results in generation of a RMS score and a corresponding color-coded facial map that highlights regions of higher and lower asymmetry. This method may be used as a screening tool for asymmetry in both the clinical and research settings.",
keywords = "3dMD, Facial asymmetry, Facial landmarks, Hemi facial microsomia, Oculoauriculovertebral spectrum, Root mean square, Three-dimensional photogrammetry",
author = "Davida Kornreich and Mitchell, {Adele A.} and Webb, {Bryn D.} and Ingrid Cristian and Jabs, {Ethylin Wang}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1597/13-353",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "126--131",
journal = "Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal",
issn = "1055-6656",
publisher = "American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults

T2 - Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach

AU - Kornreich, Davida

AU - Mitchell, Adele A.

AU - Webb, Bryn D.

AU - Cristian, Ingrid

AU - Jabs, Ethylin Wang

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: Comparison of global versus landmark analyses of facial asymmetry using threedimensional photogrammetry to establish a precise method for evaluating facial asymmetry. Design: The landmark-based approach utilized anthropometric data points. Our global approach involved registration of mirror images, independent of a midplane, to calculate a root mean square (RMS) value. We analyzed precision and technical and operator error of both methods. Participants: Three hundred fifty adults participated in this study. Results: We found that the global method has better precision and repeatability with a significantly lower error rate than the landmark-based method. In adults, the average RMS was 0.6253 mm with a standard deviation of 0.16. Conclusions: Our facial asymmetry measurement is more accurate than landmark-based measurements. This method is quick, reliable, and results in generation of a RMS score and a corresponding color-coded facial map that highlights regions of higher and lower asymmetry. This method may be used as a screening tool for asymmetry in both the clinical and research settings.

AB - Objective: Comparison of global versus landmark analyses of facial asymmetry using threedimensional photogrammetry to establish a precise method for evaluating facial asymmetry. Design: The landmark-based approach utilized anthropometric data points. Our global approach involved registration of mirror images, independent of a midplane, to calculate a root mean square (RMS) value. We analyzed precision and technical and operator error of both methods. Participants: Three hundred fifty adults participated in this study. Results: We found that the global method has better precision and repeatability with a significantly lower error rate than the landmark-based method. In adults, the average RMS was 0.6253 mm with a standard deviation of 0.16. Conclusions: Our facial asymmetry measurement is more accurate than landmark-based measurements. This method is quick, reliable, and results in generation of a RMS score and a corresponding color-coded facial map that highlights regions of higher and lower asymmetry. This method may be used as a screening tool for asymmetry in both the clinical and research settings.

KW - 3dMD

KW - Facial asymmetry

KW - Facial landmarks

KW - Hemi facial microsomia

KW - Oculoauriculovertebral spectrum

KW - Root mean square

KW - Three-dimensional photogrammetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957634009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957634009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1597/13-353

DO - 10.1597/13-353

M3 - Article

C2 - 25489769

AN - SCOPUS:84957634009

VL - 53

SP - 126

EP - 131

JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

SN - 1055-6656

IS - 1

ER -