Quantitative analysis of iris parameters in keratoconus patients using optical coherence tomography

Gustavo Bonfadini, Karun Arora, Lucas M. Vianna, Mauro Campos, David S Friedman, Beatriz Munoz, Albert Jun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between quantitative iris parameters and the presence of keratoconus. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study that included 15 affected eyes of 15 patients with keratoconus and 26 eyes of 26 normal age- and sex-matched controls. Iris parameters (area, thickness, and pupil diameter) of affected and unaffected eyes were measured under standardized light and dark conditions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). To identify optimal iris thickness cutoff points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity when discriminating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, the analysis included the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Iris thickness and area were lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. The mean thickness at the pupillary margin under both light and dark conditions was found to be the best parameter for discriminating normal patients from keratoconus patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AROC), which had a value of 0.8256 with 80.0% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity, using a cutoff of 0.4125 mm. The sensitivity increased to 86.7% when a cutoff of 0.4700 mm was used. Conclusions: In our sample, iris thickness was lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. These results suggest that tomographic parameters may provide novel adjunct approaches for keratoconus screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-309
Number of pages5
JournalArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Volume78
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Keratoconus
Optical Coherence Tomography
Iris
ROC Curve
Light
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pupil
Observational Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Cornea
  • Dilatation pathologic
  • Iris
  • Keratoconus
  • Optical coherence
  • ROC curve
  • Tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Quantitative analysis of iris parameters in keratoconus patients using optical coherence tomography. / Bonfadini, Gustavo; Arora, Karun; Vianna, Lucas M.; Campos, Mauro; Friedman, David S; Munoz, Beatriz; Jun, Albert.

In: Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, Vol. 78, No. 5, 2015, p. 305-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3abd8880e7754b5f9bbd4ea776e310b5,
title = "Quantitative analysis of iris parameters in keratoconus patients using optical coherence tomography",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the relationship between quantitative iris parameters and the presence of keratoconus. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study that included 15 affected eyes of 15 patients with keratoconus and 26 eyes of 26 normal age- and sex-matched controls. Iris parameters (area, thickness, and pupil diameter) of affected and unaffected eyes were measured under standardized light and dark conditions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). To identify optimal iris thickness cutoff points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity when discriminating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, the analysis included the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Iris thickness and area were lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. The mean thickness at the pupillary margin under both light and dark conditions was found to be the best parameter for discriminating normal patients from keratoconus patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AROC), which had a value of 0.8256 with 80.0{\%} sensitivity and 84.6{\%} specificity, using a cutoff of 0.4125 mm. The sensitivity increased to 86.7{\%} when a cutoff of 0.4700 mm was used. Conclusions: In our sample, iris thickness was lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. These results suggest that tomographic parameters may provide novel adjunct approaches for keratoconus screening.",
keywords = "Cornea, Dilatation pathologic, Iris, Keratoconus, Optical coherence, ROC curve, Tomography",
author = "Gustavo Bonfadini and Karun Arora and Vianna, {Lucas M.} and Mauro Campos and Friedman, {David S} and Beatriz Munoz and Albert Jun",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.5935/0004-2749.20150080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "305--309",
journal = "Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia",
issn = "0004-2749",
publisher = "Conselho Brasileiro De Oftalmologia",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative analysis of iris parameters in keratoconus patients using optical coherence tomography

AU - Bonfadini, Gustavo

AU - Arora, Karun

AU - Vianna, Lucas M.

AU - Campos, Mauro

AU - Friedman, David S

AU - Munoz, Beatriz

AU - Jun, Albert

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the relationship between quantitative iris parameters and the presence of keratoconus. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study that included 15 affected eyes of 15 patients with keratoconus and 26 eyes of 26 normal age- and sex-matched controls. Iris parameters (area, thickness, and pupil diameter) of affected and unaffected eyes were measured under standardized light and dark conditions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). To identify optimal iris thickness cutoff points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity when discriminating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, the analysis included the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Iris thickness and area were lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. The mean thickness at the pupillary margin under both light and dark conditions was found to be the best parameter for discriminating normal patients from keratoconus patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AROC), which had a value of 0.8256 with 80.0% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity, using a cutoff of 0.4125 mm. The sensitivity increased to 86.7% when a cutoff of 0.4700 mm was used. Conclusions: In our sample, iris thickness was lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. These results suggest that tomographic parameters may provide novel adjunct approaches for keratoconus screening.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the relationship between quantitative iris parameters and the presence of keratoconus. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study that included 15 affected eyes of 15 patients with keratoconus and 26 eyes of 26 normal age- and sex-matched controls. Iris parameters (area, thickness, and pupil diameter) of affected and unaffected eyes were measured under standardized light and dark conditions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). To identify optimal iris thickness cutoff points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity when discriminating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, the analysis included the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Iris thickness and area were lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. The mean thickness at the pupillary margin under both light and dark conditions was found to be the best parameter for discriminating normal patients from keratoconus patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AROC), which had a value of 0.8256 with 80.0% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity, using a cutoff of 0.4125 mm. The sensitivity increased to 86.7% when a cutoff of 0.4700 mm was used. Conclusions: In our sample, iris thickness was lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. These results suggest that tomographic parameters may provide novel adjunct approaches for keratoconus screening.

KW - Cornea

KW - Dilatation pathologic

KW - Iris

KW - Keratoconus

KW - Optical coherence

KW - ROC curve

KW - Tomography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945918511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945918511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5935/0004-2749.20150080

DO - 10.5935/0004-2749.20150080

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 305

EP - 309

JO - Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

JF - Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

SN - 0004-2749

IS - 5

ER -