Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-A systematic review

Jing Yi Li, Yuan Fen Zhang, Gordon S. Smith, Chuan Jiang Xue, Yan Nan Luo, Wei Heng Chen, Craig J. Skinner, Joseph Finkelstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the reporting quality of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Tai Chi literature following the publication of the CONSORT guidelines in 2001. Data Sources. The OVID MEDLINE and PUBMED databases. Review Methods. To survey the general characteristics of Tai Chi RCTs in the literature, we included any report if (i) it was an original report of the trial; (ii) its design was RCT; (iii) one of the treatments being tested was Tai Chi; and (iv) it was in English. In addition, we assessed the reporting quality of RCTs that were published between 2002 and 2007, using a modified CONSORT checklist of 40 items. The adequate description of Tai Chi interventions in these trials was examined against a 10-item checklist adapted from previous reviews. Results. The search yielded 31 Tai Chi RCTs published from 2002 to 2007 and only 11 for 19922001. Among trials published during 20022007, the most adequately reported criteria were related to background, participant eligibility and interpretation of the study results. Nonetheless, the most poorly reported items were associated with randomization allocation concealment, implementation of randomization and the definitions of period of recruitment and follow-up. In addition, only 23 of RCTs provided adequate details of Tai Chi intervention used in the trials. Conclusion. The findings in this review indicated that the reporting quality of Tai Chi intervention trials is sub-optimal. Substantial improvement is required to meet the CONSORT guidelines and allow assessment of the quality of evidence. We believe that not only investigators, but also journal editors, reviewers and funding agencies need to follow the CONSORT guidelines to improve the standards of research and strengthen the evidence base for Tai Chi and for complementary and alternative medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number383245
JournalEvidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume2011
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Tai Ji
Randomized Controlled Trials
Guidelines
Complementary Therapies
Random Allocation
Checklist
Information Storage and Retrieval
MEDLINE
Publications
Research Personnel
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Li, J. Y., Zhang, Y. F., Smith, G. S., Xue, C. J., Luo, Y. N., Chen, W. H., ... Finkelstein, J. (2011). Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-A systematic review. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011, [383245]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep022

Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-A systematic review. / Li, Jing Yi; Zhang, Yuan Fen; Smith, Gordon S.; Xue, Chuan Jiang; Luo, Yan Nan; Chen, Wei Heng; Skinner, Craig J.; Finkelstein, Joseph.

In: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Vol. 2011, 383245, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Jing Yi ; Zhang, Yuan Fen ; Smith, Gordon S. ; Xue, Chuan Jiang ; Luo, Yan Nan ; Chen, Wei Heng ; Skinner, Craig J. ; Finkelstein, Joseph. / Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-A systematic review. In: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 2011.
@article{eeeaa5c97a3f4d4d94a2de0c074e61bb,
title = "Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-A systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives. To evaluate the reporting quality of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Tai Chi literature following the publication of the CONSORT guidelines in 2001. Data Sources. The OVID MEDLINE and PUBMED databases. Review Methods. To survey the general characteristics of Tai Chi RCTs in the literature, we included any report if (i) it was an original report of the trial; (ii) its design was RCT; (iii) one of the treatments being tested was Tai Chi; and (iv) it was in English. In addition, we assessed the reporting quality of RCTs that were published between 2002 and 2007, using a modified CONSORT checklist of 40 items. The adequate description of Tai Chi interventions in these trials was examined against a 10-item checklist adapted from previous reviews. Results. The search yielded 31 Tai Chi RCTs published from 2002 to 2007 and only 11 for 19922001. Among trials published during 20022007, the most adequately reported criteria were related to background, participant eligibility and interpretation of the study results. Nonetheless, the most poorly reported items were associated with randomization allocation concealment, implementation of randomization and the definitions of period of recruitment and follow-up. In addition, only 23 of RCTs provided adequate details of Tai Chi intervention used in the trials. Conclusion. The findings in this review indicated that the reporting quality of Tai Chi intervention trials is sub-optimal. Substantial improvement is required to meet the CONSORT guidelines and allow assessment of the quality of evidence. We believe that not only investigators, but also journal editors, reviewers and funding agencies need to follow the CONSORT guidelines to improve the standards of research and strengthen the evidence base for Tai Chi and for complementary and alternative medicine.",
author = "Li, {Jing Yi} and Zhang, {Yuan Fen} and Smith, {Gordon S.} and Xue, {Chuan Jiang} and Luo, {Yan Nan} and Chen, {Wei Heng} and Skinner, {Craig J.} and Joseph Finkelstein",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1093/ecam/nep022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2011",
journal = "Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine",
issn = "1741-427X",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in tai chi interventions-A systematic review

AU - Li, Jing Yi

AU - Zhang, Yuan Fen

AU - Smith, Gordon S.

AU - Xue, Chuan Jiang

AU - Luo, Yan Nan

AU - Chen, Wei Heng

AU - Skinner, Craig J.

AU - Finkelstein, Joseph

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objectives. To evaluate the reporting quality of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Tai Chi literature following the publication of the CONSORT guidelines in 2001. Data Sources. The OVID MEDLINE and PUBMED databases. Review Methods. To survey the general characteristics of Tai Chi RCTs in the literature, we included any report if (i) it was an original report of the trial; (ii) its design was RCT; (iii) one of the treatments being tested was Tai Chi; and (iv) it was in English. In addition, we assessed the reporting quality of RCTs that were published between 2002 and 2007, using a modified CONSORT checklist of 40 items. The adequate description of Tai Chi interventions in these trials was examined against a 10-item checklist adapted from previous reviews. Results. The search yielded 31 Tai Chi RCTs published from 2002 to 2007 and only 11 for 19922001. Among trials published during 20022007, the most adequately reported criteria were related to background, participant eligibility and interpretation of the study results. Nonetheless, the most poorly reported items were associated with randomization allocation concealment, implementation of randomization and the definitions of period of recruitment and follow-up. In addition, only 23 of RCTs provided adequate details of Tai Chi intervention used in the trials. Conclusion. The findings in this review indicated that the reporting quality of Tai Chi intervention trials is sub-optimal. Substantial improvement is required to meet the CONSORT guidelines and allow assessment of the quality of evidence. We believe that not only investigators, but also journal editors, reviewers and funding agencies need to follow the CONSORT guidelines to improve the standards of research and strengthen the evidence base for Tai Chi and for complementary and alternative medicine.

AB - Objectives. To evaluate the reporting quality of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Tai Chi literature following the publication of the CONSORT guidelines in 2001. Data Sources. The OVID MEDLINE and PUBMED databases. Review Methods. To survey the general characteristics of Tai Chi RCTs in the literature, we included any report if (i) it was an original report of the trial; (ii) its design was RCT; (iii) one of the treatments being tested was Tai Chi; and (iv) it was in English. In addition, we assessed the reporting quality of RCTs that were published between 2002 and 2007, using a modified CONSORT checklist of 40 items. The adequate description of Tai Chi interventions in these trials was examined against a 10-item checklist adapted from previous reviews. Results. The search yielded 31 Tai Chi RCTs published from 2002 to 2007 and only 11 for 19922001. Among trials published during 20022007, the most adequately reported criteria were related to background, participant eligibility and interpretation of the study results. Nonetheless, the most poorly reported items were associated with randomization allocation concealment, implementation of randomization and the definitions of period of recruitment and follow-up. In addition, only 23 of RCTs provided adequate details of Tai Chi intervention used in the trials. Conclusion. The findings in this review indicated that the reporting quality of Tai Chi intervention trials is sub-optimal. Substantial improvement is required to meet the CONSORT guidelines and allow assessment of the quality of evidence. We believe that not only investigators, but also journal editors, reviewers and funding agencies need to follow the CONSORT guidelines to improve the standards of research and strengthen the evidence base for Tai Chi and for complementary and alternative medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052708195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052708195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ecam/nep022

DO - 10.1093/ecam/nep022

M3 - Article

C2 - 19351709

AN - SCOPUS:80052708195

VL - 2011

JO - Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

SN - 1741-427X

M1 - 383245

ER -