TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of life in youth with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss
AU - Meyer, Abby
AU - Sie, Kathleen
AU - Skalicky, Anne
AU - Edwards, Todd C.
AU - Schick, Brenda
AU - Niparko, John
AU - Patrick, Donald L.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - Importance: Adolescence is a life stage with rapid and major developmental changes, yet little is known about how these changes influence the quality of life of young people who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH). Objective: To determine differences in the 3 domains of a hearing-specific quality-of-life instrument between youth who had severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss based on whether they used no technology, hearing aids, or cochlear implants. Design and Setting: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study. Participants: A convenience sample of 11-to 18-year-old youths with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss recruited between January 1 and December 31, 2008. Main Outcome Measures: Youth Quality of Life-Research Instrument and Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing (YQoL-DHH) scores. The YQoL-DHH was composed of 3 domains: participation, self-acceptance/advocacy, and stigma-related quality of life. Results: A total of 157 individuals participated. Overall mean (SD) age was 14.1 (2.3) years, and the femalemale ratio was 82:75. Forty-nine individuals (31.2%) were not using any technology, 45 (28.7%) were using hearing aids, and 63 (40.1%) were using cochlear implants. Mean age of unilateral or first cochlear implant was 62.9 months. Thirty-eight individuals (24.2%) attended schools with DHH programs, 55 (35.0%) attended schools without DHH programs, and 58 (36.9%) attended schools for the deaf. Statistically significant differences were noted in YQoL-DHH participation and perceived stigma scores between the groups when stratified by technology used and school setting. Conclusions: These data suggest that the domains of quality of life as measured by our instrument differ significantly among youth based on technology used and school setting. Youth using no technology or cochlear implants tended to score higher than those using hearing aids in mainstream schools with or without DHH programs and in schools for the deaf. The YQoL-DHH instrument is able to detect differences in quality of life within a group of youth with severe to profound hearing loss.
AB - Importance: Adolescence is a life stage with rapid and major developmental changes, yet little is known about how these changes influence the quality of life of young people who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH). Objective: To determine differences in the 3 domains of a hearing-specific quality-of-life instrument between youth who had severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss based on whether they used no technology, hearing aids, or cochlear implants. Design and Setting: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study. Participants: A convenience sample of 11-to 18-year-old youths with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss recruited between January 1 and December 31, 2008. Main Outcome Measures: Youth Quality of Life-Research Instrument and Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing (YQoL-DHH) scores. The YQoL-DHH was composed of 3 domains: participation, self-acceptance/advocacy, and stigma-related quality of life. Results: A total of 157 individuals participated. Overall mean (SD) age was 14.1 (2.3) years, and the femalemale ratio was 82:75. Forty-nine individuals (31.2%) were not using any technology, 45 (28.7%) were using hearing aids, and 63 (40.1%) were using cochlear implants. Mean age of unilateral or first cochlear implant was 62.9 months. Thirty-eight individuals (24.2%) attended schools with DHH programs, 55 (35.0%) attended schools without DHH programs, and 58 (36.9%) attended schools for the deaf. Statistically significant differences were noted in YQoL-DHH participation and perceived stigma scores between the groups when stratified by technology used and school setting. Conclusions: These data suggest that the domains of quality of life as measured by our instrument differ significantly among youth based on technology used and school setting. Youth using no technology or cochlear implants tended to score higher than those using hearing aids in mainstream schools with or without DHH programs and in schools for the deaf. The YQoL-DHH instrument is able to detect differences in quality of life within a group of youth with severe to profound hearing loss.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875859529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875859529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 23657441
AN - SCOPUS:84875859529
SN - 2168-6181
VL - 139
SP - 294
EP - 300
JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 3
ER -