Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation

Benjamin Djulbegovic, Ambuj Kumar, Richard M. Kaufman, Aaron Tobian, Gordon H. Guyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives The objective of the study was to assess the association between Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) factors and the strength of recommendations. Study Design and Setting The study was conducted as part of the development of clinical practice guideline (CPG) by American Association of Blood Banking related to role of prophylactic vs. therapeutic transfusion for the management of thrombocytopenia. The association between GRADE factors and strength of recommendations was assessed using logistic regression and multilevel mixed effect logistic regression model. Results Seventeen members of the CPG panel participated in the recommendation process. The quality of evidence was the only statistically significant (odds ratio = 4.5; P < 0.001) GRADE factor associated with the strength of recommendations. The predictive model showed that there is about 90% probability that panelists would issue the same (strong) recommendation when confidence in the effects of intervention is high vs. 10% when the quality of evidence is very low. Conclusion The results showed that quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong vs. a weak recommendation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)727-732
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume68
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Guideline development
  • Practice guidelines
  • Practice recommendations
  • Quality of evidence
  • quality improvement
  • trustworthy guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this