Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity

J. M. Valderas, J. Gangannagaripalli, E. Nolte, Cynthia Boyd, M. Roland, A. Sarria-Santamera, E. Jones, M. Rijken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Multimorbidity, the simultaneous presence of multiple health conditions in an individual, is an increasingly common phenomenon globally. The systematic assessment of the quality of care delivered to people with multimorbidity will be key to informing the organization of services for meeting their complex needs. Yet, current assessments tend to focus on single conditions and do not capture the complex processes that are required for providing care for people with multimorbidity. We conducted a scoping review on quality of care and multimorbidity in selected databases in June 2018 and identified 87 documents as eligible for review, predominantly original research and reviews from North America, Europe and Australasia and mostly frequently related to primary care settings. We synthesized data qualitatively in terms of perceived challenges, evidence and proposed metrics. Findings reveal that the association between quality of care and multimorbidity is complex and depends on the conditions involved (quality appears to be higher for those with concordant conditions, and lower in the presence of discordant conditions) and the approach used for measuring quality (quality appears to be higher in people with multimorbidity when measured using condition/drug-specific process or intermediate outcome indicators, and worse when using patient-centred reports of experiences of care). People with discordant multimorbidity may be disadvantaged by current approaches to quality assessment, particularly when they are linked to financial incentives. A better understanding of models of care that best meet the needs of this group is needed for developing appropriate quality assessment frameworks. Capturing patient preferences and values and incorporate patients’ voices in the form of patient-reported experiences and outcomes of care will be critical towards the achievement of high-performing health systems that are responsive to the needs of people with multimorbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-300
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Internal Medicine
Volume285
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Comorbidity
Australasia
Patient Preference
Health
Vulnerable Populations
North America
Motivation
Primary Health Care
Databases
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • comorbidity
  • health systems performance assessment
  • multimorbidity
  • patient reported outcomes measures
  • patient safety
  • quality of health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Valderas, J. M., Gangannagaripalli, J., Nolte, E., Boyd, C., Roland, M., Sarria-Santamera, A., ... Rijken, M. (2019). Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity. Journal of Internal Medicine, 285(3), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12881

Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity. / Valderas, J. M.; Gangannagaripalli, J.; Nolte, E.; Boyd, Cynthia; Roland, M.; Sarria-Santamera, A.; Jones, E.; Rijken, M.

In: Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 285, No. 3, 01.03.2019, p. 289-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valderas, JM, Gangannagaripalli, J, Nolte, E, Boyd, C, Roland, M, Sarria-Santamera, A, Jones, E & Rijken, M 2019, 'Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity', Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 285, no. 3, pp. 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12881
Valderas JM, Gangannagaripalli J, Nolte E, Boyd C, Roland M, Sarria-Santamera A et al. Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2019 Mar 1;285(3):289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12881
Valderas, J. M. ; Gangannagaripalli, J. ; Nolte, E. ; Boyd, Cynthia ; Roland, M. ; Sarria-Santamera, A. ; Jones, E. ; Rijken, M. / Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity. In: Journal of Internal Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 285, No. 3. pp. 289-300.
@article{623bd35f982d48c2a5675a4bca7ce637,
title = "Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity",
abstract = "Multimorbidity, the simultaneous presence of multiple health conditions in an individual, is an increasingly common phenomenon globally. The systematic assessment of the quality of care delivered to people with multimorbidity will be key to informing the organization of services for meeting their complex needs. Yet, current assessments tend to focus on single conditions and do not capture the complex processes that are required for providing care for people with multimorbidity. We conducted a scoping review on quality of care and multimorbidity in selected databases in June 2018 and identified 87 documents as eligible for review, predominantly original research and reviews from North America, Europe and Australasia and mostly frequently related to primary care settings. We synthesized data qualitatively in terms of perceived challenges, evidence and proposed metrics. Findings reveal that the association between quality of care and multimorbidity is complex and depends on the conditions involved (quality appears to be higher for those with concordant conditions, and lower in the presence of discordant conditions) and the approach used for measuring quality (quality appears to be higher in people with multimorbidity when measured using condition/drug-specific process or intermediate outcome indicators, and worse when using patient-centred reports of experiences of care). People with discordant multimorbidity may be disadvantaged by current approaches to quality assessment, particularly when they are linked to financial incentives. A better understanding of models of care that best meet the needs of this group is needed for developing appropriate quality assessment frameworks. Capturing patient preferences and values and incorporate patients’ voices in the form of patient-reported experiences and outcomes of care will be critical towards the achievement of high-performing health systems that are responsive to the needs of people with multimorbidity.",
keywords = "comorbidity, health systems performance assessment, multimorbidity, patient reported outcomes measures, patient safety, quality of health care",
author = "Valderas, {J. M.} and J. Gangannagaripalli and E. Nolte and Cynthia Boyd and M. Roland and A. Sarria-Santamera and E. Jones and M. Rijken",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/joim.12881",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "285",
pages = "289--300",
journal = "Journal of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0954-6820",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of care assessment for people with multimorbidity

AU - Valderas, J. M.

AU - Gangannagaripalli, J.

AU - Nolte, E.

AU - Boyd, Cynthia

AU - Roland, M.

AU - Sarria-Santamera, A.

AU - Jones, E.

AU - Rijken, M.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Multimorbidity, the simultaneous presence of multiple health conditions in an individual, is an increasingly common phenomenon globally. The systematic assessment of the quality of care delivered to people with multimorbidity will be key to informing the organization of services for meeting their complex needs. Yet, current assessments tend to focus on single conditions and do not capture the complex processes that are required for providing care for people with multimorbidity. We conducted a scoping review on quality of care and multimorbidity in selected databases in June 2018 and identified 87 documents as eligible for review, predominantly original research and reviews from North America, Europe and Australasia and mostly frequently related to primary care settings. We synthesized data qualitatively in terms of perceived challenges, evidence and proposed metrics. Findings reveal that the association between quality of care and multimorbidity is complex and depends on the conditions involved (quality appears to be higher for those with concordant conditions, and lower in the presence of discordant conditions) and the approach used for measuring quality (quality appears to be higher in people with multimorbidity when measured using condition/drug-specific process or intermediate outcome indicators, and worse when using patient-centred reports of experiences of care). People with discordant multimorbidity may be disadvantaged by current approaches to quality assessment, particularly when they are linked to financial incentives. A better understanding of models of care that best meet the needs of this group is needed for developing appropriate quality assessment frameworks. Capturing patient preferences and values and incorporate patients’ voices in the form of patient-reported experiences and outcomes of care will be critical towards the achievement of high-performing health systems that are responsive to the needs of people with multimorbidity.

AB - Multimorbidity, the simultaneous presence of multiple health conditions in an individual, is an increasingly common phenomenon globally. The systematic assessment of the quality of care delivered to people with multimorbidity will be key to informing the organization of services for meeting their complex needs. Yet, current assessments tend to focus on single conditions and do not capture the complex processes that are required for providing care for people with multimorbidity. We conducted a scoping review on quality of care and multimorbidity in selected databases in June 2018 and identified 87 documents as eligible for review, predominantly original research and reviews from North America, Europe and Australasia and mostly frequently related to primary care settings. We synthesized data qualitatively in terms of perceived challenges, evidence and proposed metrics. Findings reveal that the association between quality of care and multimorbidity is complex and depends on the conditions involved (quality appears to be higher for those with concordant conditions, and lower in the presence of discordant conditions) and the approach used for measuring quality (quality appears to be higher in people with multimorbidity when measured using condition/drug-specific process or intermediate outcome indicators, and worse when using patient-centred reports of experiences of care). People with discordant multimorbidity may be disadvantaged by current approaches to quality assessment, particularly when they are linked to financial incentives. A better understanding of models of care that best meet the needs of this group is needed for developing appropriate quality assessment frameworks. Capturing patient preferences and values and incorporate patients’ voices in the form of patient-reported experiences and outcomes of care will be critical towards the achievement of high-performing health systems that are responsive to the needs of people with multimorbidity.

KW - comorbidity

KW - health systems performance assessment

KW - multimorbidity

KW - patient reported outcomes measures

KW - patient safety

KW - quality of health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062395465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062395465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/joim.12881

DO - 10.1111/joim.12881

M3 - Article

C2 - 30719790

AN - SCOPUS:85062395465

VL - 285

SP - 289

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of Internal Medicine

SN - 0954-6820

IS - 3

ER -