Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial

Martin J. Yaffe, Aili K. Bloomquist, Gordon E. Mawdsley, Etta D. Pisano, R. Edward Hendrick, Laurie L. Fajardo, John M. Boone, Kalpana Kanal, Mahadevappa Mahesh, Richard C. Fleischman, Joseph Och, Mark B. Williams, Daniel J. Beideck, Andrew D A Maidment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), conducted under the auspices of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), is a clinical trial designed to compare the accuracy of digital versus screen-film mammography in a screening population [E. Pisano, ACRIN 6652-Digital vs. Screen-Film Mammography, ACRIN (2001)]. Part I of this work described the Quality Control program developed to ensure consistency and optimal operation of the digital equipment. For many of the tests, there were no failures during the 24 months imaging was performed in DMIST. When systems failed, they generally did so suddenly rather than through gradual deterioration of performance. In this part, the utility and effectiveness of those tests are considered. This suggests that after verification of proper operation, routine extensive testing would be of minimal value. A recommended set of tests is presented including additional and improved tests, which we believe meet the intent and spirit of the Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations to ensure that full-field digital mammography systems are functioning correctly, and consistently producing mammograms of excellent image quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)737-752
Number of pages16
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Mammography
Radiology
Quality Control
Clinical Trials
Equipment and Supplies
Population

Keywords

  • Digital mammography
  • Image quality
  • Quality control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Yaffe, M. J., Bloomquist, A. K., Mawdsley, G. E., Pisano, E. D., Hendrick, R. E., Fajardo, L. L., ... Maidment, A. D. A. (2006). Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. Medical Physics, 33(3), 737-752. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2164067

Quality control for digital mammography : Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. / Yaffe, Martin J.; Bloomquist, Aili K.; Mawdsley, Gordon E.; Pisano, Etta D.; Hendrick, R. Edward; Fajardo, Laurie L.; Boone, John M.; Kanal, Kalpana; Mahesh, Mahadevappa; Fleischman, Richard C.; Och, Joseph; Williams, Mark B.; Beideck, Daniel J.; Maidment, Andrew D A.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 737-752.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yaffe, MJ, Bloomquist, AK, Mawdsley, GE, Pisano, ED, Hendrick, RE, Fajardo, LL, Boone, JM, Kanal, K, Mahesh, M, Fleischman, RC, Och, J, Williams, MB, Beideck, DJ & Maidment, ADA 2006, 'Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial', Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 737-752. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2164067
Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist AK, Mawdsley GE, Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Fajardo LL et al. Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. Medical Physics. 2006 Mar;33(3):737-752. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2164067
Yaffe, Martin J. ; Bloomquist, Aili K. ; Mawdsley, Gordon E. ; Pisano, Etta D. ; Hendrick, R. Edward ; Fajardo, Laurie L. ; Boone, John M. ; Kanal, Kalpana ; Mahesh, Mahadevappa ; Fleischman, Richard C. ; Och, Joseph ; Williams, Mark B. ; Beideck, Daniel J. ; Maidment, Andrew D A. / Quality control for digital mammography : Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 737-752.
@article{4544bdcb38dd45e9843d5b5ab4b2c435,
title = "Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial",
abstract = "The Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), conducted under the auspices of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), is a clinical trial designed to compare the accuracy of digital versus screen-film mammography in a screening population [E. Pisano, ACRIN 6652-Digital vs. Screen-Film Mammography, ACRIN (2001)]. Part I of this work described the Quality Control program developed to ensure consistency and optimal operation of the digital equipment. For many of the tests, there were no failures during the 24 months imaging was performed in DMIST. When systems failed, they generally did so suddenly rather than through gradual deterioration of performance. In this part, the utility and effectiveness of those tests are considered. This suggests that after verification of proper operation, routine extensive testing would be of minimal value. A recommended set of tests is presented including additional and improved tests, which we believe meet the intent and spirit of the Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations to ensure that full-field digital mammography systems are functioning correctly, and consistently producing mammograms of excellent image quality.",
keywords = "Digital mammography, Image quality, Quality control",
author = "Yaffe, {Martin J.} and Bloomquist, {Aili K.} and Mawdsley, {Gordon E.} and Pisano, {Etta D.} and Hendrick, {R. Edward} and Fajardo, {Laurie L.} and Boone, {John M.} and Kalpana Kanal and Mahadevappa Mahesh and Fleischman, {Richard C.} and Joseph Och and Williams, {Mark B.} and Beideck, {Daniel J.} and Maidment, {Andrew D A}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1118/1.2164067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "737--752",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality control for digital mammography

T2 - Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial

AU - Yaffe, Martin J.

AU - Bloomquist, Aili K.

AU - Mawdsley, Gordon E.

AU - Pisano, Etta D.

AU - Hendrick, R. Edward

AU - Fajardo, Laurie L.

AU - Boone, John M.

AU - Kanal, Kalpana

AU - Mahesh, Mahadevappa

AU - Fleischman, Richard C.

AU - Och, Joseph

AU - Williams, Mark B.

AU - Beideck, Daniel J.

AU - Maidment, Andrew D A

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - The Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), conducted under the auspices of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), is a clinical trial designed to compare the accuracy of digital versus screen-film mammography in a screening population [E. Pisano, ACRIN 6652-Digital vs. Screen-Film Mammography, ACRIN (2001)]. Part I of this work described the Quality Control program developed to ensure consistency and optimal operation of the digital equipment. For many of the tests, there were no failures during the 24 months imaging was performed in DMIST. When systems failed, they generally did so suddenly rather than through gradual deterioration of performance. In this part, the utility and effectiveness of those tests are considered. This suggests that after verification of proper operation, routine extensive testing would be of minimal value. A recommended set of tests is presented including additional and improved tests, which we believe meet the intent and spirit of the Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations to ensure that full-field digital mammography systems are functioning correctly, and consistently producing mammograms of excellent image quality.

AB - The Digital Mammography Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST), conducted under the auspices of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), is a clinical trial designed to compare the accuracy of digital versus screen-film mammography in a screening population [E. Pisano, ACRIN 6652-Digital vs. Screen-Film Mammography, ACRIN (2001)]. Part I of this work described the Quality Control program developed to ensure consistency and optimal operation of the digital equipment. For many of the tests, there were no failures during the 24 months imaging was performed in DMIST. When systems failed, they generally did so suddenly rather than through gradual deterioration of performance. In this part, the utility and effectiveness of those tests are considered. This suggests that after verification of proper operation, routine extensive testing would be of minimal value. A recommended set of tests is presented including additional and improved tests, which we believe meet the intent and spirit of the Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations to ensure that full-field digital mammography systems are functioning correctly, and consistently producing mammograms of excellent image quality.

KW - Digital mammography

KW - Image quality

KW - Quality control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644630719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644630719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2164067

DO - 10.1118/1.2164067

M3 - Article

C2 - 16878576

AN - SCOPUS:33644630719

VL - 33

SP - 737

EP - 752

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 3

ER -