Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis: The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience

Anderson C. Armstrong, Erin P. Ricketts, Christopher Cox, Paul Adler, Alexander Arynchyn, Kiang Liu, Ellen Stengel, Stephen Sidney, Cora E. Lewis, Pamela J. Schreiner, James M. Shikany, Kimberly Keck, Jamie Merlo, Samuel S. Gidding, Joao Lima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Few large studies describe quality control procedures and reproducibility findings in cardiovascular ultrasound, particularly in novel techniques such as speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). We evaluate the echocardiography assessment performance in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study Year 25 (Y25) examination (2010-2011) and report findings from a quality control and reproducibility program conducted to assess Field Center image acquisition and reading center (RC) accuracy. Methods The CARDIA Y25 examination had 3475 echocardiograms performed in 4 US Field Centers and analyzed in a RC, assessing standard echocardiography (LA dimension, aortic root, LV mass, LV end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], ejection fraction [LVEF]), and STE (two- and four-chamber longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains). Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. Results For standard echocardiography reproducibility, LV mass and LVEDV consistently had CV above 10% and aortic root below 6%. Intra-sonographer aortic root and LV mass had the most robust values of ICC in standard echocardiography. For STE, the number of properly tracking segments was above 80% in short-axis and four-chamber and 58% in two-chamber views. Longitudinal strain parameters were the most robust and radial strain showed the highest variation. Comparing Field Centers with echocardiography RC STE readings, mean differences ranged from 0.4% to 4.1% and ICC from 0.37 to 0.66, with robust results for longitudinal strains. Conclusion Echocardiography image acquisition and reading processes in the CARDIA study were highly reproducible, including robust results for STE analysis. Consistent quality control may increase the reliability of echocardiography measurements in large cohort studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1233-1240
Number of pages8
JournalEchocardiography
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Quality Control
Echocardiography
Young Adult
Coronary Vessels
Reading
Reproducibility of Results
Cohort Studies

Keywords

  • echocardiography
  • quality control
  • reproducibility
  • speckle tracking echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis : The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience. / Armstrong, Anderson C.; Ricketts, Erin P.; Cox, Christopher; Adler, Paul; Arynchyn, Alexander; Liu, Kiang; Stengel, Ellen; Sidney, Stephen; Lewis, Cora E.; Schreiner, Pamela J.; Shikany, James M.; Keck, Kimberly; Merlo, Jamie; Gidding, Samuel S.; Lima, Joao.

In: Echocardiography, Vol. 32, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 1233-1240.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Armstrong, AC, Ricketts, EP, Cox, C, Adler, P, Arynchyn, A, Liu, K, Stengel, E, Sidney, S, Lewis, CE, Schreiner, PJ, Shikany, JM, Keck, K, Merlo, J, Gidding, SS & Lima, J 2015, 'Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis: The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience', Echocardiography, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1233-1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.12832
Armstrong, Anderson C. ; Ricketts, Erin P. ; Cox, Christopher ; Adler, Paul ; Arynchyn, Alexander ; Liu, Kiang ; Stengel, Ellen ; Sidney, Stephen ; Lewis, Cora E. ; Schreiner, Pamela J. ; Shikany, James M. ; Keck, Kimberly ; Merlo, Jamie ; Gidding, Samuel S. ; Lima, Joao. / Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis : The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience. In: Echocardiography. 2015 ; Vol. 32, No. 8. pp. 1233-1240.
@article{598f2c61b1c3494da2f001dd698c8bfb,
title = "Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis: The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience",
abstract = "Introduction Few large studies describe quality control procedures and reproducibility findings in cardiovascular ultrasound, particularly in novel techniques such as speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). We evaluate the echocardiography assessment performance in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study Year 25 (Y25) examination (2010-2011) and report findings from a quality control and reproducibility program conducted to assess Field Center image acquisition and reading center (RC) accuracy. Methods The CARDIA Y25 examination had 3475 echocardiograms performed in 4 US Field Centers and analyzed in a RC, assessing standard echocardiography (LA dimension, aortic root, LV mass, LV end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], ejection fraction [LVEF]), and STE (two- and four-chamber longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains). Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. Results For standard echocardiography reproducibility, LV mass and LVEDV consistently had CV above 10{\%} and aortic root below 6{\%}. Intra-sonographer aortic root and LV mass had the most robust values of ICC in standard echocardiography. For STE, the number of properly tracking segments was above 80{\%} in short-axis and four-chamber and 58{\%} in two-chamber views. Longitudinal strain parameters were the most robust and radial strain showed the highest variation. Comparing Field Centers with echocardiography RC STE readings, mean differences ranged from 0.4{\%} to 4.1{\%} and ICC from 0.37 to 0.66, with robust results for longitudinal strains. Conclusion Echocardiography image acquisition and reading processes in the CARDIA study were highly reproducible, including robust results for STE analysis. Consistent quality control may increase the reliability of echocardiography measurements in large cohort studies.",
keywords = "echocardiography, quality control, reproducibility, speckle tracking echocardiography",
author = "Armstrong, {Anderson C.} and Ricketts, {Erin P.} and Christopher Cox and Paul Adler and Alexander Arynchyn and Kiang Liu and Ellen Stengel and Stephen Sidney and Lewis, {Cora E.} and Schreiner, {Pamela J.} and Shikany, {James M.} and Kimberly Keck and Jamie Merlo and Gidding, {Samuel S.} and Joao Lima",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/echo.12832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1233--1240",
journal = "Echocardiography",
issn = "0742-2822",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality Control and Reproducibility in M-Mode, Two-Dimensional, and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Acquisition and Analysis

T2 - The CARDIA Study, Year 25 Examination Experience

AU - Armstrong, Anderson C.

AU - Ricketts, Erin P.

AU - Cox, Christopher

AU - Adler, Paul

AU - Arynchyn, Alexander

AU - Liu, Kiang

AU - Stengel, Ellen

AU - Sidney, Stephen

AU - Lewis, Cora E.

AU - Schreiner, Pamela J.

AU - Shikany, James M.

AU - Keck, Kimberly

AU - Merlo, Jamie

AU - Gidding, Samuel S.

AU - Lima, Joao

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Introduction Few large studies describe quality control procedures and reproducibility findings in cardiovascular ultrasound, particularly in novel techniques such as speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). We evaluate the echocardiography assessment performance in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study Year 25 (Y25) examination (2010-2011) and report findings from a quality control and reproducibility program conducted to assess Field Center image acquisition and reading center (RC) accuracy. Methods The CARDIA Y25 examination had 3475 echocardiograms performed in 4 US Field Centers and analyzed in a RC, assessing standard echocardiography (LA dimension, aortic root, LV mass, LV end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], ejection fraction [LVEF]), and STE (two- and four-chamber longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains). Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. Results For standard echocardiography reproducibility, LV mass and LVEDV consistently had CV above 10% and aortic root below 6%. Intra-sonographer aortic root and LV mass had the most robust values of ICC in standard echocardiography. For STE, the number of properly tracking segments was above 80% in short-axis and four-chamber and 58% in two-chamber views. Longitudinal strain parameters were the most robust and radial strain showed the highest variation. Comparing Field Centers with echocardiography RC STE readings, mean differences ranged from 0.4% to 4.1% and ICC from 0.37 to 0.66, with robust results for longitudinal strains. Conclusion Echocardiography image acquisition and reading processes in the CARDIA study were highly reproducible, including robust results for STE analysis. Consistent quality control may increase the reliability of echocardiography measurements in large cohort studies.

AB - Introduction Few large studies describe quality control procedures and reproducibility findings in cardiovascular ultrasound, particularly in novel techniques such as speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). We evaluate the echocardiography assessment performance in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study Year 25 (Y25) examination (2010-2011) and report findings from a quality control and reproducibility program conducted to assess Field Center image acquisition and reading center (RC) accuracy. Methods The CARDIA Y25 examination had 3475 echocardiograms performed in 4 US Field Centers and analyzed in a RC, assessing standard echocardiography (LA dimension, aortic root, LV mass, LV end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], ejection fraction [LVEF]), and STE (two- and four-chamber longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains). Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman plots. Results For standard echocardiography reproducibility, LV mass and LVEDV consistently had CV above 10% and aortic root below 6%. Intra-sonographer aortic root and LV mass had the most robust values of ICC in standard echocardiography. For STE, the number of properly tracking segments was above 80% in short-axis and four-chamber and 58% in two-chamber views. Longitudinal strain parameters were the most robust and radial strain showed the highest variation. Comparing Field Centers with echocardiography RC STE readings, mean differences ranged from 0.4% to 4.1% and ICC from 0.37 to 0.66, with robust results for longitudinal strains. Conclusion Echocardiography image acquisition and reading processes in the CARDIA study were highly reproducible, including robust results for STE analysis. Consistent quality control may increase the reliability of echocardiography measurements in large cohort studies.

KW - echocardiography

KW - quality control

KW - reproducibility

KW - speckle tracking echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937390259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937390259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/echo.12832

DO - 10.1111/echo.12832

M3 - Article

C2 - 25382818

AN - SCOPUS:84937390259

VL - 32

SP - 1233

EP - 1240

JO - Echocardiography

JF - Echocardiography

SN - 0742-2822

IS - 8

ER -