Quality assured science: Managerialism in forensic biology

Myles Leslie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article takes as its point of departure the idea that the adoption of managerial principles to ensure the quality of DNA evidence is an accident of history which has changed the ways forensic biology is conducted and forensic biologists think. I begin by defining managerialism and tracking its entry into the contentious world of forensic biology, asking how it is that a focus on efficiency and precise process control is affecting these labs. My analysis unfolds in two parts. I first look at the external inspection routines that assure quality in forensic labs and the degree to which these routines represent "self" rather than "peer" assessment. I next look at the internal lab quality assurance (QA) routines that facilitate managerial control of technical and scientific workers, noting that QA is a trope flexible enough to govern both the numerically auditable and quasirobotic activities of technicians along with the less tangible more consensus-based human interactions of scientists. Illustrating that "science" is being pushed aside by management imperatives, I examine the consequences of this new emphasis for both the lab workers and the criminal justice system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-306
Number of pages24
JournalScience Technology and Human Values
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality assurance
biology
quality assurance
science
Process control
worker
Accidents
DNA
control process
Inspection
technician
accident
justice
efficiency
history
interaction
management
evidence
Managerialism
Workers

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Audit
  • Forensic biology
  • Forensic science
  • Managerialism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Engineering(all)
  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Anthropology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Quality assured science : Managerialism in forensic biology. / Leslie, Myles.

In: Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 35, No. 3, 05.2010, p. 283-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d451cdde8cd4ab9a48fafcf91a4f1be,
title = "Quality assured science: Managerialism in forensic biology",
abstract = "This article takes as its point of departure the idea that the adoption of managerial principles to ensure the quality of DNA evidence is an accident of history which has changed the ways forensic biology is conducted and forensic biologists think. I begin by defining managerialism and tracking its entry into the contentious world of forensic biology, asking how it is that a focus on efficiency and precise process control is affecting these labs. My analysis unfolds in two parts. I first look at the external inspection routines that assure quality in forensic labs and the degree to which these routines represent {"}self{"} rather than {"}peer{"} assessment. I next look at the internal lab quality assurance (QA) routines that facilitate managerial control of technical and scientific workers, noting that QA is a trope flexible enough to govern both the numerically auditable and quasirobotic activities of technicians along with the less tangible more consensus-based human interactions of scientists. Illustrating that {"}science{"} is being pushed aside by management imperatives, I examine the consequences of this new emphasis for both the lab workers and the criminal justice system.",
keywords = "Accountability, Audit, Forensic biology, Forensic science, Managerialism",
author = "Myles Leslie",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0162243909340271",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "283--306",
journal = "Science Technology and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality assured science

T2 - Managerialism in forensic biology

AU - Leslie, Myles

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - This article takes as its point of departure the idea that the adoption of managerial principles to ensure the quality of DNA evidence is an accident of history which has changed the ways forensic biology is conducted and forensic biologists think. I begin by defining managerialism and tracking its entry into the contentious world of forensic biology, asking how it is that a focus on efficiency and precise process control is affecting these labs. My analysis unfolds in two parts. I first look at the external inspection routines that assure quality in forensic labs and the degree to which these routines represent "self" rather than "peer" assessment. I next look at the internal lab quality assurance (QA) routines that facilitate managerial control of technical and scientific workers, noting that QA is a trope flexible enough to govern both the numerically auditable and quasirobotic activities of technicians along with the less tangible more consensus-based human interactions of scientists. Illustrating that "science" is being pushed aside by management imperatives, I examine the consequences of this new emphasis for both the lab workers and the criminal justice system.

AB - This article takes as its point of departure the idea that the adoption of managerial principles to ensure the quality of DNA evidence is an accident of history which has changed the ways forensic biology is conducted and forensic biologists think. I begin by defining managerialism and tracking its entry into the contentious world of forensic biology, asking how it is that a focus on efficiency and precise process control is affecting these labs. My analysis unfolds in two parts. I first look at the external inspection routines that assure quality in forensic labs and the degree to which these routines represent "self" rather than "peer" assessment. I next look at the internal lab quality assurance (QA) routines that facilitate managerial control of technical and scientific workers, noting that QA is a trope flexible enough to govern both the numerically auditable and quasirobotic activities of technicians along with the less tangible more consensus-based human interactions of scientists. Illustrating that "science" is being pushed aside by management imperatives, I examine the consequences of this new emphasis for both the lab workers and the criminal justice system.

KW - Accountability

KW - Audit

KW - Forensic biology

KW - Forensic science

KW - Managerialism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950994750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950994750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0162243909340271

DO - 10.1177/0162243909340271

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77950994750

VL - 35

SP - 283

EP - 306

JO - Science Technology and Human Values

JF - Science Technology and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 3

ER -