Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media

N. R. Powe, M. L. Kinnison, E. P. Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to define the relative benefits of low-osmolality contrast media (LOM) and high-osmolality contrast media (HOM). Because of the clinical and economic significance of the conclusions drawn from these RCTs, the authors used a standardized instrument to evaluate the quality of study design and data analysis of 100 RCTs published between 1982 and 1987 that compared LOM and HOM. The mean quality score (± standard deviation) was 39 ± 12 (maximum possible score, 100). The largest number of patients studied in any RCT was 435; the smallest was five. A majority of the RCTs received high scores on three attributes of quality, intermediate scores on seven, and low scores on nine. These results underscore the difficulty of designing, performing, analyzing, and reporting high-quality RCTs. Nevertheless, limitations in study design and data analysis need to be considered when interpreting results of these RCTs. Future RCTs comparing LOM and HOM should be performed with greater attention to basic elements of good study design and data analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-380
Number of pages4
JournalRadiology
Volume170
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Contrast Media
Randomized Controlled Trials
Osmolar Concentration
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Powe, N. R., Kinnison, M. L., & Steinberg, E. P. (1989). Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media. Radiology, 170(2), 377-380.

Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media. / Powe, N. R.; Kinnison, M. L.; Steinberg, E. P.

In: Radiology, Vol. 170, No. 2, 1989, p. 377-380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Powe, NR, Kinnison, ML & Steinberg, EP 1989, 'Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media', Radiology, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 377-380.
Powe NR, Kinnison ML, Steinberg EP. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media. Radiology. 1989;170(2):377-380.
Powe, N. R. ; Kinnison, M. L. ; Steinberg, E. P. / Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media. In: Radiology. 1989 ; Vol. 170, No. 2. pp. 377-380.
@article{18c33eebe8f14929becfe7247e2689c6,
title = "Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media",
abstract = "Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to define the relative benefits of low-osmolality contrast media (LOM) and high-osmolality contrast media (HOM). Because of the clinical and economic significance of the conclusions drawn from these RCTs, the authors used a standardized instrument to evaluate the quality of study design and data analysis of 100 RCTs published between 1982 and 1987 that compared LOM and HOM. The mean quality score (± standard deviation) was 39 ± 12 (maximum possible score, 100). The largest number of patients studied in any RCT was 435; the smallest was five. A majority of the RCTs received high scores on three attributes of quality, intermediate scores on seven, and low scores on nine. These results underscore the difficulty of designing, performing, analyzing, and reporting high-quality RCTs. Nevertheless, limitations in study design and data analysis need to be considered when interpreting results of these RCTs. Future RCTs comparing LOM and HOM should be performed with greater attention to basic elements of good study design and data analysis.",
author = "Powe, {N. R.} and Kinnison, {M. L.} and Steinberg, {E. P.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "377--380",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media

AU - Powe, N. R.

AU - Kinnison, M. L.

AU - Steinberg, E. P.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to define the relative benefits of low-osmolality contrast media (LOM) and high-osmolality contrast media (HOM). Because of the clinical and economic significance of the conclusions drawn from these RCTs, the authors used a standardized instrument to evaluate the quality of study design and data analysis of 100 RCTs published between 1982 and 1987 that compared LOM and HOM. The mean quality score (± standard deviation) was 39 ± 12 (maximum possible score, 100). The largest number of patients studied in any RCT was 435; the smallest was five. A majority of the RCTs received high scores on three attributes of quality, intermediate scores on seven, and low scores on nine. These results underscore the difficulty of designing, performing, analyzing, and reporting high-quality RCTs. Nevertheless, limitations in study design and data analysis need to be considered when interpreting results of these RCTs. Future RCTs comparing LOM and HOM should be performed with greater attention to basic elements of good study design and data analysis.

AB - Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to define the relative benefits of low-osmolality contrast media (LOM) and high-osmolality contrast media (HOM). Because of the clinical and economic significance of the conclusions drawn from these RCTs, the authors used a standardized instrument to evaluate the quality of study design and data analysis of 100 RCTs published between 1982 and 1987 that compared LOM and HOM. The mean quality score (± standard deviation) was 39 ± 12 (maximum possible score, 100). The largest number of patients studied in any RCT was 435; the smallest was five. A majority of the RCTs received high scores on three attributes of quality, intermediate scores on seven, and low scores on nine. These results underscore the difficulty of designing, performing, analyzing, and reporting high-quality RCTs. Nevertheless, limitations in study design and data analysis need to be considered when interpreting results of these RCTs. Future RCTs comparing LOM and HOM should be performed with greater attention to basic elements of good study design and data analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024574856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024574856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2911662

AN - SCOPUS:0024574856

VL - 170

SP - 377

EP - 380

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -